In recent rants, I have noted the problems we as a country have inherited from two blatantly unconstitutional issues or programs; that being our Welfare State and the “War on Drugs.” Both of these programs have wide support among liberals and conservatives. Unfortunately, the majority of people have no problem with unconstitutional legislation that fits their desires or beliefs. For instance, while many local, regional and national farmers are most critical of food stamps and other forms of socialism, they have absolutely no problem whatsoever with the US Department of Agriculture’s “Conservation Reserve Program” (CRP) which provides farmers large taxpayer funded subsidies to not farm their land. (Both welfare whores and farmers are being paid to do nothing) Believe me; if a farmer protests other unconstitutional government programs, they sometimes receive not so subtle reminders of the “free money” they receive; money that is extracted from their fellow Americans by threat or coercion. Continue reading
Powered by Max Banner Ads
Arguably, the most prevalent form of mental illness in this country is cognitive disconnect. People get totally lost when it comes to being able to rationally address cause and effect. Of course, mental acuity, when saturated with liberal doses of emotionalism and group think becomes feeble to non-existent.
The symptom I wish to address specifically is one that has been on the political table for decades: immigration. The causes, which are all too often ignored, are directly related to unconstitutional acts by our government. Many times these unconstitutional acts are wildly supported by a constitutionally ignorant population. Continue reading
We hear on a regular basis from talking heads in government what our founders intended our government to be, but seldom, if ever, do we hear a candidate for public office quote our founders such as Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson. With the possible exception of Ron Paul, I can’t remember hearing either one of the two mentioned at all in recent history. Why is that, one might ask?
Well, most politicians don’t want to quote anyone whose political philosophy contradicts almost everything they support, promise to do and campaign for. Continue reading
“I solemnly swear to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.”
What would you call the person who foolishly trades away their individual rights as defined in the Bill of Rights and also traded away all of their rights as guaranteed by their creator? To make it even worse, what if that person actually paid to have their rights destroyed and then embraced and worshiped the people who stole those rights?
An overwhelming majority of the people who have worked most diligently to destroy this country and its republican form of government have taken a sacred oath to do exactly the opposite of what they have accomplished. They took the oath that is quoted in the opening of this article. Continue reading
It appears that Donald Trump has signed a contract with the devil. Fortunately for many, Trump was able to bring taboo subjects into popular discussion; topics the Republican Party hierarchy found most uncomfortable. The media whores had no choice but to cover these issues and the pasture full of candidates for the party’s nomination found themselves talking about subjects they would rather have avoided. Prime among those subjects was illegal immigration. Arguably, illegal immigration is just as dangerous to our sovereignty as is any nuclear agreement with Iran; whether by bombs, bullets or diluted sovereignty—dead is dead.
The debate on illegal immigration has brought to the forefront discussions about “anchor babies” and that has led to the questions of citizenship as is mentioned in the 14th Amendment. I have received multiple requests to address or attempt a clarification of the points in question. Continue reading
“Pops added, “you know, they say if you don’t vote, you get the government you deserve.”
“And if you do, you never get the results you expected,” Katherine replied.” ~ E. A. Bucchianeri, Brushstrokes of a Gadfly
For the better part of two decades I have been puzzled and frustrated as I watch people go about increasing their mad addiction to the source of most of their problems: government. Over that period of time I have watched as our government has become more and more tyrannical and unconstitutional and marveled that a great majority of people see the cure for that problem to be liberal doses of more of that same government, simply packaged with a different label or championed by a different psychopath. It appears the old “hair of the dog that bit you” cure for an alcohol or drug induced hangover has been ideologically embraced as it pertains to government and its constant ailments. Continue reading
are about to take their toll!
“The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy” ~ Carroll Quigley Tragedy and Hope
All of the ballyhoo, comments and news reports about the candidates for president in the 2016 campaign season would be humorous if the truth behind elections in this country was not so sad.
It matters not one iota who wins the next presidential election or the congressional elections for that matter—this country will continue to swirl down the drain of history because our president and the vast majority of members of congress owe their allegiance to the power cabal. The better description of this power cabal would be the National Security state. Continue reading
Some folks I’m sure turn to TV or some other form of the media for their dose of laughter, but for me I get all the mirth I need from some of the emails in my inbox. Yesterday was no exception. I received an email from a very well intentioned lady patriot in Florida. She was somewhat apoplectic that the American people were being stonewalled by the US government on an important issue. I do not find humor the system is criminal but in the fact she believes there is a form of recourse left to the people. Continue reading
“None so deaf as those who will not hear. No so blind as those who will not see.” ~ Matthew Henry
It has been downright funny at times to sit and watch as the Republicans react to the political antics of Donald Trump. Here, I believe, is a classic example of the factualness of a theory that has been posited by many: there is really no philosophical difference between the two major political parties in this country. Would the verbal attacks on Trump by Graham and McCain have been different in substance had they been delivered by Hillary or Obama? Is there not the common denominators of perpetual war, unlimited borrowing and open borders shared by all four?
When one dons the mantle of Republican Party faithful, membership in the inner sanctum requires logic and true insight be sacrificed on the altar of party loyalty. There could never be a better example than when a hysterically ignorant member of the local Republican Party hierarchy informed me in a rather loud voice that George W. Bush was a “true hero” because “He kept this country safe.” Continue reading
“The consolidation of the states into one vast republic, sure to be aggressive abroad and despotic at home, will be the certain precursor of that ruin which has overwhelmed all those that have preceded it.” ~ Robert Edward Lee
Of course it was about slavery. To state otherwise would be irresponsible and unconscionable. While any form of slavery or involuntary servitude is despicable and contrary to all paradigms involving freedom and liberty, perhaps the focus of this individual atrocity should rest as much on the slavery created by the war as well as the slavery that preceded it.
Chattel slavery certainly had its impacts, especially the threats to slave owners in the South from fire breathing insane abolitionists like John Brown, including of course the disproportionate number of free blacks who also owned slaves. Continue reading
First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
The concept in the above quote credited to Martin Niemoller is certainly relevant to current events in this country. On the 17th of May in Waco Texas, what could best be described as a mass assassination occurred in the parking lot of a restaurant known as Twin Peaks. Of course, if your mind and reasoning process has been invaded and is now a prisoner of the mass media culture operating under the aegis of Operation Mockingbird, you of course believe a group of dastardly criminals riding motorcycles took time off from selling illegal drugs, raping young girls and terrorizing neighborhoods to shoot each other at a community meeting. Of course, thanks to the alleged alert government authorities, some from the same alphabet agencies that killed 80 men, women and children in their church in the same town back in 1993, not quite as many folks met their death. Continue reading
In a grand display of institutionalized ignorance, a 2012 candidate for sheriff in our county, a veteran of many years in law enforcement, when asked if he would intervene should the federal government seek to impose unconstitutional measures in our county, responded with three words: “by what authority?” In an even more spectacular display of institutionalized ignorance, the people of this county elected this man.
Institutionalized ignorance aside, the question posed by the candidate, now sheriff, was a relevant question. The problem was it was directed toward the wrong entity. The question “by what authority,” instead of being leveled at citizens should instead be leveled at all levels of government, especially the federal government. Continue reading
~ Forewords ~
I wrote the below a few weeks more than two years ago fully realizing that there would be some false flag event perpetrated by our government masters which would further vilify and demonize the flag of my ancestors. I also knew that such an act of tyranny could only be perpetrated against a mass of people so ignorant of this country’s history they would fall for any emotional ruse. Watching the idiots in the media and the ignorant at all levels follow the dictates of the psychopaths in government for the past few days, I felt compelled to issue this re-rant.
The ignorant who claim fealty to our Second Amendment but continue to support this government should pay close attention to the mental chaos created against my flag that represents resistance to tyranny, for soon you will witness the same when it comes to individual ownership of firearms. The die has been cast, we only await the next false flag event which will do to firearms ownership what has been done to the St. Andrews Cross. (M.G.)
“Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God” ~ attributed to Benjamin Franklin, found on the cemetery gate at Jefferson’s Monticello. Continue reading
“Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God.” ~ attributed to Benjamin Franklin, found on the cemetery gate at Jefferson’s Monticello
I’ve reached my saturation point with those who get apoplectic when they view others as not embracing tolerance and diversity but gleefully deny the same to those of Southern Heritage and their ancestors.
I have a large number of ancestors who fought for their respective states in the Second War for Independence, erroneously referred to in revisionist history as the Civil War. Several gave the ultimate sacrifice; none owned slaves.
Our history has been so perverted on this subject a great majority of citizens’ base their understanding of the events of that era on nothing but government sponsored lies. Continue reading
“But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism…” ~ Thomas Jefferson, Declaration of Independence
I would contend that a large majority of violent events that began with 9/11, continued through Aurora, Sandy Hook, Boston, Ferguson, Baltimore and now Charleston, are nothing if not a long train of abuses and usurpations pursuing invariably the same end: the complete and total destruction of individual freedom and liberty in this country.
Looked at intelligently and without the rose colored glasses of government idolatry, all those events have continued to grow government at an alarming rate and continually led to politicians, their lapdogs in the media and members of the species Ignoramus Americanus to call for more and more government control over our lives and the subsequent loss of liberty. Continue reading
“I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so.” ~ Abraham Lincoln, First Inaugural Address, March 4, 1861.
When Abraham Lincoln took office in March of 1861, this country had observed the institution of chattel slavery for its entire existence. President Lincoln, having secured not one electoral vote from the Southern States, declared in his First Inaugural Address that it was his full intention to use the power of the presidency to perpetuate and protect that onerous institution “in the states where it exists.” Continue reading
Sources state that five of the nine bikers killed in Waco on Sunday received gunshot wounds to the head with two others whose deadly wounds were listed as “unspecified.” What are the chances the majority of people killed in a parking lot shootout would be hit in the head? What are the chances that in such a shootout which takes place in a busy shopping center with the police admittedly involved; only bikers are hit in the obvious hail of gunfire—no innocent bystanders—no police? Was it coincidence that a SWAT team had been deployed to the site of this meeting before it began? Do SWAT teams have snipers? Continue reading
As much as I wish it was otherwise, we do live in a nation as opposed to a country. The country of our founders died an ignominious death in April of 1865 at a place known to very few graduates of our Public Fool System as Appomattox Court House. In its stead we now have a nation inhabited mostly by morons addicted to alcohol, prescription and non-prescription drugs and an overdose of nationalism not seen on the world’s stage since Germany in the 1930s-40s. Continue reading
“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel.” ~ Patrick Henry
Patrick Henry, one who could be referred to as the leader of the Anti-federalists, fought tirelessly for individual liberty and freedom. Many of our founders considered Henry to be among the most devout Christians of their time. It is believed Henry’s oratory skills were honed when he was asked to repeat the sermons of Samuel Davies for his mother when he was a young man.
As has been oft stated here, Henry refused to attend the Constitutional Convention of 1787 because he “smelt a rat leaning toward a Monarchy” and spoke almost daily in the Virginia Ratification Convention against the ratification of the Constitution without a Bill of Rights. Arguably, a Bill of Rights would have never been drafted and ratified had it not been for Patrick Henry and those who followed his lead in the other states. Continue reading
“The government is merely a servant―merely a temporary servant; it cannot be its prerogative to determine what is right and what is wrong, and decide who is a patriot and who isn’t. Its function is to obey orders, not originate them.” ~ Mark Twain
It would be hard to argue the great majority of people in this country totally misunderstand what the “only legitimate objects of government” actually are. Many look at government as a paycheck; others look at government as an excuse not to work; many look at government as a tool to use to increase their power over others or to increase their wealth. To many, government becomes a surrogate parent, but the most terrifying and destructive to Liberty are those who see government as a deity.
Many of those who scoff at the possibility they worship at the feet of government are quick to state to all who will listen that the government or government/employee/representative is the final arbiter of all questions of rights and freedom. They fail to see that such a belief is totally contradictory to the tenets of our Declaration of Independence. Continue reading
Authors note: Recently, I have received several emails from readers who question my “constant referral” to events in history and the demonization of those some consider to be “icons” in this country’s history. This further compounds my lack of understanding of those who complain of the events currently taking place in our country, fully attributable to a corrupt government, and their contradictory belief in the propaganda produced by the same government when it comes to the “enemies” we should fear and be willing to invade, bomb and kill. Even more confusing, this commitment of lives and resources is based solely on the word of a government that, according to a recent CNN poll, 87% of the American people don’t trust! ~ M.G. Continue reading
“But whether the Constitution be one thing or another, this much is certain—that it has either authorized such a government as we have had or has been powerless to prevent it.” ~ Lysander Spooner
Our Constitution, as signed on September 17, 1787, was an instrument created by mostly politicians and lawyers, who, hiding behind the façade of being Federalists, proposed a government that would convert the present method of governing from one of “consent of the governed” into an instrument that would provide to the chosen few the powers of unlimited taxation, the creation of a massive bureaucracy, standing army and militarized police to implement their desires.
The people who deserve our praise and devotion are those who have been relegated to the waste bin of history for all intents and purposes, for to mention them in current history would necessitate an explanation as to who they were and what principles of freedom and liberty they fought for. Continue reading
“The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound shifts in policy.” ~ Professor Carroll Quigley, Bill Clinton’s mentor at Georgetown University, author of Tragedy and Hope
“There is not a dime’s worth of difference between the Democrat and Republican Parties” ~ Governor George C. Wallace in the 1968 presidential campaign
In answer to my previous Rant, a good friend and true Patriot, DW, poignantly pointed out to me that unfortunately in our country, the populace is made up of a ratio of at least nine ignorant, hypocritical idiots who prefer being lied to for every person who actually understands the concepts of Liberty. Continue reading
52 FAMOUS WORDS OF CONTENTION
“We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”
From May of 1787 to the State Ratification Conventions to a monumental debate in the United States Senate in 1833, the 52 words of the Preamble to the US Constitution has been a point of contention as to whether we were intended to have a National or a Constitutional Republic form of government. Continue reading
Authors note: If we were to believe what most of us were taught in the public fool system, we would believe that in May of 1787, a group of very special people who were divinely inspired, met during the hot summer months and with the blessings and guidance of the almighty, created a governing document for the ages. As nice and comfortable a parable as that might be, simply put, the facts do not support the thesis. ~ M.G.
A frequent subject for today is “transparency” in government. Much like the Fountain of Youth or Bigfoot, transparency in government is quite elusive and is arguably just as much a myth. Those who met in Philadelphia in May 1787 certainly did everything within their power to make sure the proceedings there were kept from the prying ears and eyes of the public. The meetings were held on the second floor, the windows were covered and there was a guard placed at the entrance. There was also the solemn promise among the delegates that the particulars of those proceedings would not be made public for fifty years. Continue reading
Authors Note: I have received an unusual number of comments and questions from new and old readers asking most relevant questions in response to my last Rant. My first impulse was to attempt to answer each of those questions individually, but I have decided instead to answer them using this forum. This will require a slight deviation in the direction I had previously intended these lessons to take. ~ M.G.
It is an easily understood axiom that the closer one stands to the fire, the more they feel the heat. That holds true especially for the fire of freedom. The Declaration of Independence was written when the fire of liberty was burning deep in the hearts and souls of people such as Samuel Adams, John Hancock, Thomas Jefferson, Patrick Henry, Paul Revere and others. The Articles of Confederation were written shortly thereafter, while the Revolutionary War was raging in 1777, but did not come in force until Maryland, concerned with incursions into the state by the Redcoats, ratified in 1781. Continue reading
Authors note: Several readers have asked about the importance of covering the fact Madison, Hamilton and others were pushing a nationalist form of government. This information is critical because the nationalist/monarchial form of government that was introduced and supported by Madison, Hamilton and others was repeatedly defeated, both in the Constitutional Convention of 1787 and the subsequent State Ratifying Conventions. Unfortunately, what our founders intended, a Republic, has long since been abandoned for the nationalist form of government the majority opposed. In fact, our government has morphed into a National Socialist form of government not ideologically different than the National Socialist government of Germany in the 30’s and 40’s. ~ M.G.
Regardless of how many times you read it, or how many revisionist court historians write it, there is absolutely no evidence available which indicates there was a groundswell of support among the people for abandoning the Articles of Confederation.
Where might one go to discover the truth of my allegation? Why not to the words of the man who most wanted to change the limitations of the Articles to a form of government much more to his liking; a monarchy, and failing that, a strong centralized national government: Alexander Hamilton. Here it is in his words.
“Men of intelligence, discovered the feebleness of the structure, [Articles of Confederation] but the great body of the people, too much engrossed with their distresses to contemplate any but the immediate causes of them, were ignorant of the defects of their Constitution.”
One would be hard pressed to argue the fact that we are perhaps the most “entertained” people on the planet. Almost everyone I know, myself included, owns at least a couple of electronic “devises” whose primary function, in most cases, is used as some form of entertainment. One can watch sports, TV episodes, play games and access other venues of entertainment on their personal phones. Watching young people would also reveal the fact we have some of the most dexterous thumbs in the world. Continue reading
(*Note: The following are excerpts of letters and personal diary entries written by General George S. Patton in 1945. They are taken from “THE PATTON PAPERS” published by Houghton Mifflin in 1974. Perhaps we should consider their relevance to today’s world and the circumstances surrounding Patton’s death and the complete socialist/militaristic takeover of our country to date. Especially how the attitudes Patton abhorred have become standard operating procedure in our government today.) ~ M.G.
PATTON DIARY, MAY 18, 1945
“In my opinion, the American Army as it now exists could beat the Russians with the greatest of ease, because, while the Russians have good infantry, they are lacking in artillery, air, tanks, and in the knowledge of the use of the combined arms, whereas we excel in all three of these. If it should be necessary to fight the Russians, the sooner we do it the better.” Continue reading
“There is not a dime’s worth of difference between the Democrat and Republican Parties” ~ George Wallace, (August 25, 1919 – September 13, 1998)
Arguably, one could state the above quote by the late iconic political figure, George Wallace, was the very epitome of the “separate but equal” legal doctrine that has been used as a political football by the American Oligarchy I have referred to as “Clowns in Black Gowns.” As it has done hundreds of times, the US Supreme Court reversed itself from a previous ruling in Plessy v Ferguson 1896 to Brown v Board of Education in 1953-54. The numerous vacillations of the black robed oligarchs demonstrates vividly our Constitution is subject to the arbitrary political agendas of nine people with questionable agendas and frequently ignores the hundreds who participated in the State Ratification conventions in 1788-89. Continue reading
We left off with our previous discussion with the 12 people who met in Annapolis Maryland in September of 1786. We learned that of the twelve, John Dickinson*, a man who had refused to sign the Declaration of Independence and supported England in the Revolutionary War was elected Chairman of that group unanimously. (* It should be noted that John Dickinson also drafted the Articles of Confederation in 1776 and was a delegate to the Convention of 1787 but had a proxy sign the constitution for him.)
We learned this convention had been called because the Congress found no interest in amending the Articles of Confederation as requested by Alexander Hamilton and it was apparent these twelve representatives wished to circumvent the Congress in their desire to “strengthen” the government. Continue reading
On several occasions I have been asked to prepare a reading list for the readers of my Rants. While I am still trying to condense a short list from the many books in my library, I truly believe the following essay should be required reading for anyone whose interests lie in the pursuit of Liberty.
One cannot effectively deal with an enemy if they do not know and understand that enemy. It is important that we realize that we are in a very small distinct minority when it comes to our pursuits. This essay is a great description of how so many become slaves to a despotic government; why they decry its encroachments on one hand and praise its killers on the other.
The fact this essay was written over 500 years ago makes it even more relevant.
Mike Continue reading
Authors note: This will be a multi-part presentation in response to several requests for more information on the founding era of our country, which in many cases is contrary to what we were all taught in history and government/civics classes. It is also beneficial to understand the motives of many at the very beginning of our country. Such motives will provide insight into what our government has morphed into during its existence.
Among us in our country today are those who are strong advocates of an omnipotent, centralized government whose every law must be obeyed and every wish granted without question or discussion, much less dissent. What are the origins of those beliefs? Could it be a desire for a king as one sees in the Scriptures (I Samuel Chapter 8) when the Israelites asked Samuel to “make us a king to judge us like all the nations?” (v 5 SKJV) Was this the first recorded act of people rejecting Natural Law in favor of the laws of man (a king)? Continue reading
I offer the following thoughts for consideration being fully aware that cognitive discourse in this country has long since been replaced by rampant emotionalism. For several generations, students in the American Gulags have been taught to “feel” while rote memorization of critical material is referred to in the current educational world as “drill and kill.” Children are taught that 2 plus 2 being 4 is not absolute and is subject to rationalization by our betters. Continue reading
“The value of history is, indeed, not scientific but moral: by liberalizing the mind, by deepening the sympathies, by fortifying the will, it enables us to control, not society, but ourselves — a much more important thing; it prepares us to live more humanely in the present and to meet rather than to foretell the future.” ~ Carl Becker, 1873-1945
If a person or political entities goal is to create a strong centralized government which operates basically as an Oligarchy, it will become necessary to disguise those intentions. The best disguise for an Oligarchy is to clothe that form of government with the costume of a Democracy. But, in order to have the masses actually believe they are involved in their own governance, any comprehensive study of history must be perverted or abandoned altogether.
For any government to transform from a government operating with the consent of the governed to a tyrannical and oppressive government directed and controlled by the powerful few, two elements must be created and developed within the governed populace. These elements, though different in composition, must be complimentary in nature. Continue reading
What is the point of no return? What could possibly happen to an individual that would cause them to abandon all sense of order and seek instead violent and deadly revenge against another human being or group of people, many of whom are unknown to the perpetrator(s) of violence? Is this human action a devotion to some fanatical practice of religion or simply a reaction to violent stimuli?
If religious fanaticism is the answer, is it possible such religious fervor exhibited in the acts of the “terrorist” creates in its opponent an overwhelming desire to abandon their professed religion? If we are truly fighting a war against radical Islam, is it OK to abandon the tenets of Christianity, a faith professed by the great majority of the so-called conservatives who support the perpetual war for peace paradigm of our government? If that has actually occurred, have the radical terrorists not already won the war? What else could constitute acceptance of the deaths of hundreds of thousands; many of them civilians, to prosecute wars we know are based on lies hatched in the halls of our own government and nurtured to maturity by a state owned and controlled media? Continue reading
Tomorrow is the birthday of one of my heroes; someone it would behoove us all to emulate. His name is Robert Edward Lee. He was born on January 19th, 208 years ago in Stratford Hall, Virginia. Instead of consuming birthday cake in his honor tomorrow, I will instead enjoy some Edwards’ Virginia ham, bacon and sausage.
I will not spend too much good time and space by delving deeply into any large number of negatives of the person for whom a federal holiday (observed tomorrow) was signed into law back in 1983 and was instituted three years later, except to state my belief this man has a holiday in his honor for the exact same reason we have our current resident in the White House; they both have/had strong backgrounds and mentors of the socialist persuasion and whose real goal is/was the polarization of the races in order to further the causes of a stronger, more centralized, socialist government. Continue reading
There are several among us who continue to be frustrated at the belief/attempts by many, though well-intentioned, that there is a magic potion that can be applied to our tyrannical government that will suddenly transform said government into a benevolent organization intent only on protecting the Natural Rights of the individual and who will operate only with the “consent of the governed.” We have witnessed several decades of those who suddenly realize the ship of state is dreadfully off course and immediately adopt a do-something-now attitude. Little do they realize that the bucket of liquid they grab in a desperate attempt to douse the fires of despotism may in fact be gasoline. Continue reading
With the recent events in France, Sunday morning TV with the exception of NFL playoff coverage was rife with questions on what the so-called “free world” should be doing to prevent future “attacks on freedom”. Of course, Johnny-on-the-spot were our favorite Military/Industrial/Congressional warmongers famously represented by Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the resident **Manchurian Candidate himself, the dishonorable Senator John McCain, pressing for “more” of everything in the way of military action, which for the uninitiated or just plain ignorant is the root cause of the majority of “terrorist” acts on our planet.
Whenever I hear such calls for ever increasing military action, including the “conservative” McCain’s favorite, “more boots on the ground” solution, I suddenly recall a quote from none other than George Carlin himself.
“Once you leave the womb, conservatives don’t care about you until you reach military age. Then you’re just what they’re looking for. Conservatives want live babies so they can raise them to be dead soldiers.”
~ Foreword ~
Almost 10 years ago, in April of 2005, I went to Southern Arizona to participate in what at the time I believed would be a little noticed event—The Minuteman Project.
A few days into the April, I was approached by the founders of the project to help manage the operation as it continued to grow beyond everyone’s expectations. I accepted the job of managing the line watching for illegals crossing Highway 92 at the base of the Huachuca Mountains. I accepted and managed this phase of the operation through the end of April when the project shut down.
As previously stated, this project exceeded anyone’s wildest expectations; within a few days we had TV personalities such as Sean Hannity and Lou Dobbs doing live shows from the border and media from the US and foreign countries appearing in droves. Answering phones and responding to interview requests became a full time job for several in the office in Tombstone almost 24 hours each day. Continue reading