There has been a common misconception about the nature of American political spectrum. In a naive man’s view, the American electorate is like a coin with its two opposing sides, the Left and the Right. At times of elections, one of the two sides of the coin ends up on the top and the respective party prevails, just like in a football game when one team wins and another loses. After the game, the teams and their fans go home and life returns to normal until the rematch during which the losing side has a chance to recover its loss. That familiar pattern, typical for sportsmen-like competitions, is supposed to describe the American elections, according to the said misconception. Continue reading
Powered by Max Banner Ads
Gun control nuts of the Left are pushing for the national registry of gun owners. It’s a “common sense” measure that, according to the anti-gun zealots, is worth of imposing it on America if only one life can be saved by it. Never mind that those who are targeted with the registration are law-abiding individuals, for otherwise they would not have passed the background check that is required for lawful acquisition of a firearm. Never mind that gangsters and criminals do not show much desire to comply with the law and are not going to register their tools of trade. Never mind that the right to keep and bear arms is guaranteed by Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, and registration of all those who wish to exercise their Constitutionally-protected rights smells like an invitation of oppression and enslavement. Continue reading
The post-election anti-Trump protests and riots begun in California before they metastasized to some other parts of the nation. Left-indoctrinated students, unassimilable Mexicans, radicalized Blacks, and other misguided individuals, took to the streets their disappointment with the election’s outcome. Although most of Americans seem to disapprove the expressions of hatred and acts of violence that often accompany these street unrests, only a few reflect upon their root cause, seeing only the tip of an iceberg that the SS America may be on a collision course with. Even fewer seem to understand the grave consequences for the nation that may result from these disturbances, never mind the fallout of hitting the whole iceberg. Continue reading
I couldn’t believe my eyes. The man who has been sworn the President of the U.S. openly encourages illegals to vote in national elections and hints that no one in his administration is going to prosecute them for illegally voting. (A link to the video is included at the en of this article.) In essence, he is telling those who have invaded our country that it’s time to deliver the final blow and take over it.
If this is not an outright act of treason then nothing is. Well, there are consequences of electing a narcissistic and ethnocentric individual the historic first anti-American President who didn’t even try to hide his grudges towards our country for past slavery, racism, and discrimination. He got his once-in-a-lifetime chance to retaliate for the wrongs that he suffered from (in his cushy, affluent life), and he sure haven’t missed that chance. Continue reading
In Soviet Union, a.k.a. the Evil Empire, over 90 percent of eligible citizens voted in national elections, of which over 90 percent voted for the members of their ruling clique. All the candidates were government-approved, and national propaganda (all Soviet main-stream media) were 100 percent in favor of those whom the ruling clique wanted to get elected. Although formally a democracy (“People’s Democracy” was sometimes used to describe it), the above insidious arrangement was the main instrument in the hands of the Soviet ruling clique with which to decide what the next Soviet government was going to be. And they did use it with professional virtuosity, making sure that the candidates favored by the ruling clique always won on a landslide. For all that was required to control Soviet elections was that most of the voters were duped into believing that the clique’s candidates were the best that the country could offer. Continue reading
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good voters do nothing.
There is a wide-spread misconception, fueled by the so-called “mainstream” media (MSM), about the actual significance of the election polls. Regardless of whether the polls are accurate or not (there is some credible evidence that some are not; see ), they do not measure, generally, what they purport to, that is, the preferences of the likely voters when they will have to chose between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton.
What the election polls do measure is how the American public reacts to the massive out-and-out anti-Trump pro-Clinton propaganda that they are exposed to about every time they turn to MSM for the news. The polls are, de facto, multiple-choice tests that the respondents take after being lectured on whom to oppose and whom to support. Continue reading
The election process in today’s America is controlled by the ruling clique that uses the state-of-the-art information technology, and the gargantuan amount of money, to maintain its grasp on political power and crush the popular anti-clique revolution which Donald Trump is the harbinger of.
Those who watch carefully elections polls may be up for a stunning discovery. Here we have a mediocre Democrat candidate with no accomplishments (if you don’t count Benghazi fiasco and its cover-up as an accomplishment) or popularity (just compare the size of Trump rallies and her rallies to see who is really popular), pushed up to the top by her former president husband using his influence and connections (remember his private “conference” with U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch when his wife was under FBI investigation?), and presumed untruthful and corrupt (Clintons amassed private fortune of about $140 million after he left the Oval Office, of which she alone made about $40 millions, without credible business or investment profit, just on “consulting” fees, royalties, and speeches honoraria that looked more like kickbacks than bona fide income) by so many, and yet, poll after poll, she is floating on the top of the wavy waters of likely voters’ measured preferences. What are the chances that without behind-the-scene manipulations this would have happened? Practically, zero. Continue reading
Many of you, probably, have not noticed it, but the unarmed invasion of America by Muslim Arab hordes is on its way. Unlike the Latino-Mexican invasion by illegal “immigrants” from the South of the border, this one is not just encouraged and facilitated by the executive branch of our government; it is being orchestrated by it under the pretense of humanitarian relief and refugee resettlement. And it appears that of all the threats that we have ever faced in our country’s history, this one is going to become the gravest threat to our ownership of the Republic that we and our ancestors have built. Although they are coming here as the “refugees”, they look like anything but the refugees. Well dressed, well fed, assertively imposing themselves and their failed theocratic system on Americans, they talk, walk, and act like presumptive future rulers of this country. Continue reading
If you lived in Soviet Union and tried to run for the Supreme Soviet (an elective body with powers similar to those of the U.S. Congress) with a political program different from the one advertised by the Soviet ruling clique, you would have everybody against you: the establishment, the press (and its propaganda), the political organizations, and for obvious reasons. But suppose you managed to politically survive until elections, and all your name ended up on the ballot. Obviously, you would lose, badly, on election day. But it would take extreme naiveté to conclude that the citizens of the Soviet Union rejected you and your program. The Soviet “elections” system was controlled by the ruling clique to assure the continuity of their monopoly on power. Continue reading
A short play
Place: any Western country (like Sweden, Denmark, Germany, United States, etc.)
- We (the People),
- The guv (our government),
- They (non-Westernized migrants, immigrants, and refugees).
We say: “Don’t bring Them in. They are permanently incompatible with our society.”
The guv says: “We did not record any convincing evidence that They are incompatible, so we conclude that They aren’t. We are bringing Them in.”
We [after they break the laws and inflict social damage] say: “Arrest Them for their wrongdoing and deport Them.”
~ Synopsis ~
This article argues against granting the U.S. government a power to discriminate against or in favor of individual Americans, but also it advocates letting the individual Americans to discriminate against or in favor of anyone as they please. In particular, it proposes that no law, federal or state, that would prohibit such individual discrimination should be passed or executed, and that governments of all levels and their bureaucracies should be not vested with powers that require moral or value judgments. Continue reading
Some 200 years ago, Thomas Malthus observed that any increase in handouts to the poor temporarily increased their living standards and translated, via their increased fertility, to their geometric population growth which, eventually, drove their living standards down back to where they were before the said increase of handouts took place.
The above observation, sometimes referred to as the Malthus Law, explains why is it so that the more effort and resources Americans put into the war on poverty that Lyndon Johnson waged the more effort and resources are needed to keep fighting it. Five decades of never-ending struggle, paired with estimated 20+ trillion dollars spent for that noble cause, supported with unprecedented advances of technology and unheard of economic growth, and we are still in square one. Continue reading
If you would like to see what the migrating masses are going do to America, Hungary’s recent experience with a wave of Third-World “migrants” (or “refugees”, like the cosmopolitan British press is calling them) will give you a glimpse into our country’s future.
Under agitatorial title “Shocking moment desperate father throws himself, his wife and baby onto rail tracks in Hungary after realising their ‘train to Austria’ is actually taking them to a refugee camp”, Daily Mail posted a series of photos, taken in Budapest earlier this week, that showed some of the things that “migrants” from Syria are capable of doing to the countries they were “migrating” to. (Link: The Daily Mail) Continue reading
I can sense a wind of change in the air. It’s almost like if a revolution was coming. And it’s not the riots and the lootings, nor is it the media-orchestrated discontent of those on the receiving end, that feels like a percolating volcano long overdue for eruption. For the first time in decades, a serious presidential contender appears to be willing to give the majority of Americans what they want: their country back. And his simple plan to make America great again strikes a chord with a rapidly growing portion of the electorate.
The man I am talking about is Donald Trump. Continue reading
The Republicans in the U.S. Congress are petrified with a possibility of impeachment of black president because he is black. They do not want to appear racist in whatever they do to him. Continue reading
You can tell a political lobby by its signature policy.
Most of us know that Obama administration is encouraging and facilitating violations of the laws that are supposed to protect our national sovereignty. He begun with immigration non-enforcement (fallaciously referred to as “prosecutorial discretion” as if the Prez had any discretion which laws to respect and which to ignore) to end up with blatant attempts to dismantle part of the existing legal system by his unilateral “executive” acts that, according to Constitutional scholars, are outright illegal. One would expect that he should preserve, protect and defend the law of the land to the best of his ability, as opposed to rejecting and trashing it, as the Oath of Office he took clearly stipulates. But if that is or was what you expected then you are in for a huge disappointment. Continue reading
Many people are analyzing the real causes of the recent surge in illegal “immigration” over the Southern border. Some blame a lack of adequate border enforcement, some blame Pres. Obama executive order (the “DREAM Act”), some, including the Prez, blame the huge gap between the living standards in the U.S. and the countries that these “immigrants” came from, and some, including the Prez, blame violence that is prevalent in those countries. Although each of the above has certainly been a significant contributing factor to the current illegal “immigration” crisis, all the analysts are missing the most important reason why tens of thousands of mothers with children, many of them pregnant, decided to push their luck and blatantly claim “their” share in the American dream.
They are coming here to breed. Continue reading
The ideology of American “Liberalism” threatens the well-being of our nation. Under the pretext of “improving” the social fabric of the country, it wrecks, one by one, the cornerstones of our freedom and prosperity. Not unlike in former Soviet Union and its satellites, it attempts to replace free markets, competition, and individual self-reliance with governmental control of the economy, central planning, and redistribution of income. Predictions of allegedly beneficial effects of that “Liberal” power grab on the American society are not that different from notoriously false promises of socialistic order. And not surprisingly so.
What was, perhaps, the most threatening aspect of socialism was the large number of otherwise normal individuals who submitted themselves almost unconditionally to the ideology they professed. It was that ideological individual submissiveness, referred by some to as a mental disease, that turned many variations of socialist ideology into advocacies of mass-murder machines. Stalin (a devout of Marxism-socialism), Hitler (a devout of national socialism) and Mao Zedong (a devout of communism) would not be able to commit their heinous, ideologically-motivated, genocidal crimes if it weren’t for tens of millions of submissive followers that those tyrants had. Continue reading
I could not believe my eyes when I saw a photo of hundred law-abiding Americans waiting obediently in line outside of the Arapahoe High School, with their hands up, to be patted down by armed-to-teeth sheriff deputies in the aftermath of a shooting a few days ago.
That picture reminded me how insignificant We the People are in the eyes of the authorities and their enforcement agencies. Deprived of their Constitutional right to keep and bear arms, unarmed and defenseless subjects, the People were treated as if they posed a deadly threat to sheriff and his deputies armed with assault weapons, many of whom in body armor and Kevlar military-style helmets, that apparently cared much more about their own safety than safety of people that they were supposed to serve and protect.
I would expect a picture like that to be taken in a Nazi Germany of 1930s and 40s where the authorities did not try to sugarcoat their hostility to regime’s real and imaginary adversaries. But in America? We have come a long way from the land of the free and the home of the brave to a socialistic-like system in which individual liberties are often referred to as loopholes or outdated reminiscences of the bygone era where the governments were for the people and not the other way around. Continue reading
The anti-gun Liberal Left invented a new trick that they are trying to pull on you.
They came up with a deceitful but catchy slogan that “Guns don’t kill people but they make it a lot easier,” and for an obvious political reason.
The first part “Guns don’t kill people” of that claim is clearly true for all guns except those rare specimens that are able to self-activate, like the motion detector-controlled submachine guns that were installed on East German border before the fall of the Berlin Wall in order to kill those who tried escape the socialist “paradise”. Continue reading
Few people know the origins of political, economic, and societal dégringolade that is decimating today’s America. Not that all bad that is happening to our country these days can be ascribed to a single event, but among major causes that sent our country into a nosedive, the 1965 Amendments to Immigration and Naturalization Act, also known as 1965 INA, stick out conspicuously.
The 1965 INA established the basic structure of today’s immigration law. According to its advocates, it was intended “only” to end discrimination. What it did actually accomplish was a de facto establishment of sweeping anti-discrimination, that is, discrimination against the majority of Americans, in the pre-1965 sense of this word, by all those, within the U.S. and outside, who were allegedly the subjects of discrimination in America before the 1965 INA was enacted into the law. Continue reading
Eastern European countries under control of Soviet Union were, nominally, democracies. The governments there were elected by the popular elections, freedom of speech was guaranteed by their constitutions, and opposition parties did exist and were represented in state legislatures.
But these were all flimsy “democracies” run by ideologically coherent clique of devout “do-gooders”: the clerics of Marxism-socialism.
The elections were controlled by propaganda, political intimidation, and control of the nomination process.
Freedom of expression had so many exceptions and restrictions that virtually no politically tainted comment qualified as a protected speech. Continue reading
Sierra Club just took on San Onofre, Calif., nuclear power plant, urging the residents to demand cutting public funding for its operation and maintenance. (A letter from a Sierra Club Task Force chair is at the end of this column.)
Sierra Club already opposes coal-powered electric plants because they pollute. It’s logical. After all, Sierra Club is and environmental organization.
Sierra Club also opposes hydroelectric plants because they disturb wildlife. While the validity of Sierra Club’s objections seems controversial, it is, arguably, still within rational. After all, Sierra Club pledged to defend the wildlife. Continue reading
As I watch the Liberalism attacking our country like AIDS on several fronts, as I witness unprecedented gun grab, importation of permanent class of angry disgruntled fast-breeding takers, election fraud and other means (indoctrination, propaganda, intimidation, forced contributions to the Left) of seizing political power in order to impose the “social justice” system that was conceived in defective minds, the mass preemption of the fruits of work of the makers, which the unions are the main driving force of, and Obama incompetence and unparalleled selfishness that amplifies and speeds-up the damaging effects of all of the above, I deeply regret that I have no time to write.
If I could, I would write two columns a day on the most burning issues that our nation faces these days.
I would write how electing a Liberal, no matter how well meaning and benevolent, is always a grave threat to our free Republic… Continue reading
Clashes between Western and Eastern civilizations had had their impact on theory of warfare. During their early medieval raids to Europe, Mongolian warriors used captives of the conquered nations, preferably women and children, as human shields when they launched assaults on fortresses and strongholds. The success of this particularly uncivilized tactics was based on the presumption that humane feelings and compassion of the attacked towards their countrymen would prevent them from using a deadly force while repelling the assault. The barbarism of this tool of war must have been clear to Western military who showed some reluctance towards adopting it from the Mongols. Beside being a clear-cut case of a blackmail, it was an insult to the Western sense of war fairness since now the Barbarians were telling the civilized: “If you guys don’t give up you will prove you are Barbarians, and that will be despicable“. Continue reading
THE “LIBERAL” ANTI-GUN HYSTERIA
The amount of absurdity in “Liberal” anti-gun hysteria that was prompted by the Sandy Hook Elementary massacre is beyond imaginable. It’s like if the “Liberals” tried to follow Hitler’s Minister of Propaganda Joseph Goebbelss doctrine that a big lie repeated often and authoritatively enough becomes the truth in the eyes of low-informed masses. Now they look and sound as if they were really up to delivering the final kill to Americans’ freedom to keep and bear arms. Yet the co-called “conservative” wing of the establishment and media is acting as if its leaders were getting ready to surrender to the “Liberals'” assault, desperately trying to find “reasonable restrictions” on freedom in order to make us all safer and happier.
As you can imagine, this whole brouhaha did not make me sleep any better. So I decided to call a spade a spade and expose “Liberal” falsehoods and fallacies in hope that the truth would deliver a fatal blow to their well-concerted attack against our most fundamental individual freedom: the freedom to self-defense with a deadly weapon. Continue reading
The tragic events at Sandy Hook Elementary left 28 innocent people dead, their families in pain and grief, and the nation shocked. A derailed maniac, after killing his own mother, took a small arsenal of guns and ammo to a school for a shooting spree. In addition to killing, he hit our national most vulnerable spot as 18 of his 28 victims were children. One can hardly imagine something more tragic and heart breaking. Not that killing adults is somehow less barbarian than killing kids, but when children lose their young lives our sensitivity to human suffering is offended more than with anything else.
There is no life event more traumatic then surviving one’s own child. And no words can bring comfort to the parents of the 18 pupils of Sandy Hook Elementary that were killed on that day. I wish I knew the words that could. Continue reading
There is an on-going debate whether Susan Rice lied in public when she announced that the attack on American consulate in Benghazi 9/11/2012 was a result of a spontaneous demonstration that was triggered by a YouTube video “Innocence of Muslims“. We all know that what she said was false but she and her defenders maintain that she did not know that when she made those announcement. And the masters of spin, including the so-called “mainstream” media, add to the confusion, blaming a lack of credible intelligence and an on-going investigation, with the obvious intent to make the subject so murky that no one would know anything anymore for sure.
We may never know if she lied. However, at least one thing is clear. Susan Rice has deceived the American public. By making categoric assertions and inferences with no hesitation whatsoever, she made people believe that her false claim about spontaneousness of the attack was as factual as that two plus two is four. Continue reading
Dear U.S. Congressman, currently not taking orders from the liberal-neocon establishment:
If nothing else seems simple and true enough for you to serve as your moral or political compass in these turbulent times, remember the Mitt Romney’s “47 percent” comment.
Despite the liberal and neocon fury that it caused, it was a statement of fact that a typical member of that “47 percent” is predisposed to vote for a typical Liberal Presidential (or Congressional) hopeful. So, unless your goal is to submit our country to the dictatorship of the liberalism, you should oppose every action that is likely to grow the percentage of working-age Americans who, due to Robin-Hoodian taxation, live of other people’s work, and support at least some of those actions that are likely to shrink it. Continue reading
Whenever I hear anyone on the Left offering a “friendly advice” that the Republican Party must revise its “rigid” stance on illegal “immigration” and stop opposing it (“embrace Hispanics” is a code-phrase often use in this context) in order to attract the Latino vote, it makes my blood boil.
To make it worse, some G.O.P. strategists (professional losers would be a more descriptive attribute here) and other “analysts” concur with the Left, which makes me doubt whether they are bona fide strategists or merely implants of the Liberal fifth column.
I keep asking myself: is this really true or am I just hallucinating? For the level of absurdity in the standard “rationale” for this kind of “advices” compares only to what one can find in “Alice in Wonderland”. Continue reading