If you lived in Soviet Union and tried to run for the Supreme Soviet (an elective body with powers similar to those of the U.S. Congress) with a political program different from the one advertised by the Soviet ruling clique, you would have everybody against you: the establishment, the press (and its propaganda), the political organizations, and for obvious reasons. But suppose you managed to politically survive until elections, and all your name ended up on the ballot. Obviously, you would lose, badly, on election day. But it would take extreme naiveté to conclude that the citizens of the Soviet Union rejected you and your program. The Soviet “elections” system was controlled by the ruling clique to assure the continuity of their monopoly on power. Continue reading
Powered by Max Banner Ads
A short play
Place: any Western country (like Sweden, Denmark, Germany, United States, etc.)
- We (the People),
- The guv (our government),
- They (non-Westernized migrants, immigrants, and refugees).
We say: “Don’t bring Them in. They are permanently incompatible with our society.”
The guv says: “We did not record any convincing evidence that They are incompatible, so we conclude that They aren’t. We are bringing Them in.”
We [after they break the laws and inflict social damage] say: “Arrest Them for their wrongdoing and deport Them.”
~ Synopsis ~
This article argues against granting the U.S. government a power to discriminate against or in favor of individual Americans, but also it advocates letting the individual Americans to discriminate against or in favor of anyone as they please. In particular, it proposes that no law, federal or state, that would prohibit such individual discrimination should be passed or executed, and that governments of all levels and their bureaucracies should be not vested with powers that require moral or value judgments. Continue reading
Some 200 years ago, Thomas Malthus observed that any increase in handouts to the poor temporarily increased their living standards and translated, via their increased fertility, to their geometric population growth which, eventually, drove their living standards down back to where they were before the said increase of handouts took place.
The above observation, sometimes referred to as the Malthus Law, explains why is it so that the more effort and resources Americans put into the war on poverty that Lyndon Johnson waged the more effort and resources are needed to keep fighting it. Five decades of never-ending struggle, paired with estimated 20+ trillion dollars spent for that noble cause, supported with unprecedented advances of technology and unheard of economic growth, and we are still in square one. Continue reading
If you would like to see what the migrating masses are going do to America, Hungary’s recent experience with a wave of Third-World “migrants” (or “refugees”, like the cosmopolitan British press is calling them) will give you a glimpse into our country’s future.
Under agitatorial title “Shocking moment desperate father throws himself, his wife and baby onto rail tracks in Hungary after realising their ‘train to Austria’ is actually taking them to a refugee camp”, Daily Mail posted a series of photos, taken in Budapest earlier this week, that showed some of the things that “migrants” from Syria are capable of doing to the countries they were “migrating” to. (Link: The Daily Mail) Continue reading
I can sense a wind of change in the air. It’s almost like if a revolution was coming. And it’s not the riots and the lootings, nor is it the media-orchestrated discontent of those on the receiving end, that feels like a percolating volcano long overdue for eruption. For the first time in decades, a serious presidential contender appears to be willing to give the majority of Americans what they want: their country back. And his simple plan to make America great again strikes a chord with a rapidly growing portion of the electorate.
The man I am talking about is Donald Trump. Continue reading
The Republicans in the U.S. Congress are petrified with a possibility of impeachment of black president because he is black. They do not want to appear racist in whatever they do to him. Continue reading
You can tell a political lobby by its signature policy.
Most of us know that Obama administration is encouraging and facilitating violations of the laws that are supposed to protect our national sovereignty. He begun with immigration non-enforcement (fallaciously referred to as “prosecutorial discretion” as if the Prez had any discretion which laws to respect and which to ignore) to end up with blatant attempts to dismantle part of the existing legal system by his unilateral “executive” acts that, according to Constitutional scholars, are outright illegal. One would expect that he should preserve, protect and defend the law of the land to the best of his ability, as opposed to rejecting and trashing it, as the Oath of Office he took clearly stipulates. But if that is or was what you expected then you are in for a huge disappointment. Continue reading
Many people are analyzing the real causes of the recent surge in illegal “immigration” over the Southern border. Some blame a lack of adequate border enforcement, some blame Pres. Obama executive order (the “DREAM Act”), some, including the Prez, blame the huge gap between the living standards in the U.S. and the countries that these “immigrants” came from, and some, including the Prez, blame violence that is prevalent in those countries. Although each of the above has certainly been a significant contributing factor to the current illegal “immigration” crisis, all the analysts are missing the most important reason why tens of thousands of mothers with children, many of them pregnant, decided to push their luck and blatantly claim “their” share in the American dream.
They are coming here to breed. Continue reading
The ideology of American “Liberalism” threatens the well-being of our nation. Under the pretext of “improving” the social fabric of the country, it wrecks, one by one, the cornerstones of our freedom and prosperity. Not unlike in former Soviet Union and its satellites, it attempts to replace free markets, competition, and individual self-reliance with governmental control of the economy, central planning, and redistribution of income. Predictions of allegedly beneficial effects of that “Liberal” power grab on the American society are not that different from notoriously false promises of socialistic order. And not surprisingly so.
What was, perhaps, the most threatening aspect of socialism was the large number of otherwise normal individuals who submitted themselves almost unconditionally to the ideology they professed. It was that ideological individual submissiveness, referred by some to as a mental disease, that turned many variations of socialist ideology into advocacies of mass-murder machines. Stalin (a devout of Marxism-socialism), Hitler (a devout of national socialism) and Mao Zedong (a devout of communism) would not be able to commit their heinous, ideologically-motivated, genocidal crimes if it weren’t for tens of millions of submissive followers that those tyrants had. Continue reading
I could not believe my eyes when I saw a photo of hundred law-abiding Americans waiting obediently in line outside of the Arapahoe High School, with their hands up, to be patted down by armed-to-teeth sheriff deputies in the aftermath of a shooting a few days ago.
That picture reminded me how insignificant We the People are in the eyes of the authorities and their enforcement agencies. Deprived of their Constitutional right to keep and bear arms, unarmed and defenseless subjects, the People were treated as if they posed a deadly threat to sheriff and his deputies armed with assault weapons, many of whom in body armor and Kevlar military-style helmets, that apparently cared much more about their own safety than safety of people that they were supposed to serve and protect.
I would expect a picture like that to be taken in a Nazi Germany of 1930s and 40s where the authorities did not try to sugarcoat their hostility to regime’s real and imaginary adversaries. But in America? We have come a long way from the land of the free and the home of the brave to a socialistic-like system in which individual liberties are often referred to as loopholes or outdated reminiscences of the bygone era where the governments were for the people and not the other way around. Continue reading
The anti-gun Liberal Left invented a new trick that they are trying to pull on you.
They came up with a deceitful but catchy slogan that “Guns don’t kill people but they make it a lot easier,” and for an obvious political reason.
The first part “Guns don’t kill people” of that claim is clearly true for all guns except those rare specimens that are able to self-activate, like the motion detector-controlled submachine guns that were installed on East German border before the fall of the Berlin Wall in order to kill those who tried escape the socialist “paradise”. Continue reading
Few people know the origins of political, economic, and societal dégringolade that is decimating today’s America. Not that all bad that is happening to our country these days can be ascribed to a single event, but among major causes that sent our country into a nosedive, the 1965 Amendments to Immigration and Naturalization Act, also known as 1965 INA, stick out conspicuously.
The 1965 INA established the basic structure of today’s immigration law. According to its advocates, it was intended “only” to end discrimination. What it did actually accomplish was a de facto establishment of sweeping anti-discrimination, that is, discrimination against the majority of Americans, in the pre-1965 sense of this word, by all those, within the U.S. and outside, who were allegedly the subjects of discrimination in America before the 1965 INA was enacted into the law. Continue reading
Eastern European countries under control of Soviet Union were, nominally, democracies. The governments there were elected by the popular elections, freedom of speech was guaranteed by their constitutions, and opposition parties did exist and were represented in state legislatures.
But these were all flimsy “democracies” run by ideologically coherent clique of devout “do-gooders”: the clerics of Marxism-socialism.
The elections were controlled by propaganda, political intimidation, and control of the nomination process.
Freedom of expression had so many exceptions and restrictions that virtually no politically tainted comment qualified as a protected speech. Continue reading
Sierra Club just took on San Onofre, Calif., nuclear power plant, urging the residents to demand cutting public funding for its operation and maintenance. (A letter from a Sierra Club Task Force chair is at the end of this column.)
Sierra Club already opposes coal-powered electric plants because they pollute. It’s logical. After all, Sierra Club is and environmental organization.
Sierra Club also opposes hydroelectric plants because they disturb wildlife. While the validity of Sierra Club’s objections seems controversial, it is, arguably, still within rational. After all, Sierra Club pledged to defend the wildlife. Continue reading
As I watch the Liberalism attacking our country like AIDS on several fronts, as I witness unprecedented gun grab, importation of permanent class of angry disgruntled fast-breeding takers, election fraud and other means (indoctrination, propaganda, intimidation, forced contributions to the Left) of seizing political power in order to impose the “social justice” system that was conceived in defective minds, the mass preemption of the fruits of work of the makers, which the unions are the main driving force of, and Obama incompetence and unparalleled selfishness that amplifies and speeds-up the damaging effects of all of the above, I deeply regret that I have no time to write.
If I could, I would write two columns a day on the most burning issues that our nation faces these days.
I would write how electing a Liberal, no matter how well meaning and benevolent, is always a grave threat to our free Republic… Continue reading
Clashes between Western and Eastern civilizations had had their impact on theory of warfare. During their early medieval raids to Europe, Mongolian warriors used captives of the conquered nations, preferably women and children, as human shields when they launched assaults on fortresses and strongholds. The success of this particularly uncivilized tactics was based on the presumption that humane feelings and compassion of the attacked towards their countrymen would prevent them from using a deadly force while repelling the assault. The barbarism of this tool of war must have been clear to Western military who showed some reluctance towards adopting it from the Mongols. Beside being a clear-cut case of a blackmail, it was an insult to the Western sense of war fairness since now the Barbarians were telling the civilized: “If you guys don’t give up you will prove you are Barbarians, and that will be despicable“. Continue reading
THE “LIBERAL” ANTI-GUN HYSTERIA
The amount of absurdity in “Liberal” anti-gun hysteria that was prompted by the Sandy Hook Elementary massacre is beyond imaginable. It’s like if the “Liberals” tried to follow Hitler’s Minister of Propaganda Joseph Goebbelss doctrine that a big lie repeated often and authoritatively enough becomes the truth in the eyes of low-informed masses. Now they look and sound as if they were really up to delivering the final kill to Americans’ freedom to keep and bear arms. Yet the co-called “conservative” wing of the establishment and media is acting as if its leaders were getting ready to surrender to the “Liberals'” assault, desperately trying to find “reasonable restrictions” on freedom in order to make us all safer and happier.
As you can imagine, this whole brouhaha did not make me sleep any better. So I decided to call a spade a spade and expose “Liberal” falsehoods and fallacies in hope that the truth would deliver a fatal blow to their well-concerted attack against our most fundamental individual freedom: the freedom to self-defense with a deadly weapon. Continue reading
The tragic events at Sandy Hook Elementary left 28 innocent people dead, their families in pain and grief, and the nation shocked. A derailed maniac, after killing his own mother, took a small arsenal of guns and ammo to a school for a shooting spree. In addition to killing, he hit our national most vulnerable spot as 18 of his 28 victims were children. One can hardly imagine something more tragic and heart breaking. Not that killing adults is somehow less barbarian than killing kids, but when children lose their young lives our sensitivity to human suffering is offended more than with anything else.
There is no life event more traumatic then surviving one’s own child. And no words can bring comfort to the parents of the 18 pupils of Sandy Hook Elementary that were killed on that day. I wish I knew the words that could. Continue reading
There is an on-going debate whether Susan Rice lied in public when she announced that the attack on American consulate in Benghazi 9/11/2012 was a result of a spontaneous demonstration that was triggered by a YouTube video “Innocence of Muslims“. We all know that what she said was false but she and her defenders maintain that she did not know that when she made those announcement. And the masters of spin, including the so-called “mainstream” media, add to the confusion, blaming a lack of credible intelligence and an on-going investigation, with the obvious intent to make the subject so murky that no one would know anything anymore for sure.
We may never know if she lied. However, at least one thing is clear. Susan Rice has deceived the American public. By making categoric assertions and inferences with no hesitation whatsoever, she made people believe that her false claim about spontaneousness of the attack was as factual as that two plus two is four. Continue reading
Dear U.S. Congressman, currently not taking orders from the liberal-neocon establishment:
If nothing else seems simple and true enough for you to serve as your moral or political compass in these turbulent times, remember the Mitt Romney’s “47 percent” comment.
Despite the liberal and neocon fury that it caused, it was a statement of fact that a typical member of that “47 percent” is predisposed to vote for a typical Liberal Presidential (or Congressional) hopeful. So, unless your goal is to submit our country to the dictatorship of the liberalism, you should oppose every action that is likely to grow the percentage of working-age Americans who, due to Robin-Hoodian taxation, live of other people’s work, and support at least some of those actions that are likely to shrink it. Continue reading
Whenever I hear anyone on the Left offering a “friendly advice” that the Republican Party must revise its “rigid” stance on illegal “immigration” and stop opposing it (“embrace Hispanics” is a code-phrase often use in this context) in order to attract the Latino vote, it makes my blood boil.
To make it worse, some G.O.P. strategists (professional losers would be a more descriptive attribute here) and other “analysts” concur with the Left, which makes me doubt whether they are bona fide strategists or merely implants of the Liberal fifth column.
I keep asking myself: is this really true or am I just hallucinating? For the level of absurdity in the standard “rationale” for this kind of “advices” compares only to what one can find in “Alice in Wonderland”. Continue reading
Nakoula Nakoula, Barrack Obama, or … Louis Farrakhan?
In this commentary, I argue that it was President Obama’s unwillingness to enrage (again) the Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan that paralyzed American defenses against the deadly attack on the U.S. diplomatic personnel in Benghazi.
Whom to blame for the U.S. Ambassador death? This burning question may have an easy answer.
Clearly, the “folks” (this is how the President Obama characterizes them while talking in public) who killed the Ambassador and three other Americans are responsible for their deaths. But a bunch of rebels, even if armed with submachine guns and mortars, might not have succeeded in their barbaric attempt if the U.S. authorities lived up to their ostensibly topmost priority of protecting lives of the American diplomatic personnel abroad. Continue reading
Dear Congressman Ryan:
You are a fine man. Unlike so many other politicians, you are committed to truth and not to ideology, you know well what you are talking about, your statements are meaningful, sound, and do not contradict each other, and you know how to carry yourself politely and with respect to your adversary. I don’t find in you any arrogance so common for some elected buffoons who cover their ignorance and a lack of intellectual sophistication with rudeness and intimidation, or empty laughter if the other two are not enough of a cover-up.
Unfortunately, your virtues won’t take you far in this political reality where narrow-minded bullies seem to enjoy enthusiastic support of nearly half (some say, 47 percent) of the American electorate, big part of that group being dominated by militant lefto-liberal activists and thuggish bosses of public sector labor unions. (Not that all public sector union bosses are that way.) This is hardly surprising as many of them insist on electing government officials that look like them and act like them. After all, birds of feather flock together. Continue reading
Warning: This may be a shocking read for some. I will not try to sugarcoat the facts that I am about to present. So, get ready for a thrilling ride, and reserve your judgment until you are done with the reading the entire article.
Let’s face it. America was made what she is, a free, prosperous, and safe country, by whites. I am not saying that others did not contribute, in many cases significantly and with personal sacrifice, to the betterment of this nation. No one denies those contributions. Nor am I implying that there are no evil doers and social parasites among us. But without whites, America would not be the land that offers its inhabitants unsurpassed liberty, high living standards, and endless opportunities for the pursuit of happiness. Continue reading
The recent fiasco of President Obama and his administration’s new Middle-East policy provides a perfect insight into the quality of presidency that those who elected him brought on our heads. Although the Secretary of State Clinton and virtually all “liberal” media were quick to blame a videotape posted on YouTube earlier this month for the recent eruption of anti-American violence across the Arab countries, what we see here is a direct consequence of amateurish efforts of the “liberal” government desperately trying to apply their naively fallacious ideology to the real world.
Well, these efforts failed, and their effects were truly disastrous – a good illustration of the conventional wisdom that the proof of the pudding is in the eating. Continue reading
On the coming 11th anniversary of the national tragedy that took more that three thousand innocent lives and turned the New York’s Twin Towers into rubble, a question keeps popping on my mind. How much more damage and waste must this great nation endure before absurd political doctrines are recognized as such and put to rest? When I listen to those who control my country and its airwaves, as they surpass each other in inventing even absurder claims after absurd claims that were supposed to justify their failed ideology, I have very little hope, if any, that they are mentally capable of seeing the nonsense in their manic visions and plans that they push down our throats. Continue reading
After nearly a one year writing hiatus, we welcome Mr. Dwyer back to the pages of the Federal Observer. (Ed.)
“That amnesty for illegal immigrants should allow them to stay in the U.S. indefinitely, just like the amnesty for thieves would allow them to keep the property they stole.” – Mark Andrew Dwyer, Idiot’s Guide to Illegal Immigration
A few days ago, June 15, 2012, President Obama announced during a press conference in Rose Garden that he had instructed the Department of Homeland Security to not deport the illegal aliens who could have benefited from the so-called “DREAM Act” rejected by the U.S. Congress earlier this year.
My jaw dropped. Here comes the administration that in its ostensible zeal to enforce the border and the immigration law had claimed, and repeatedly so, the federal supremacy (see the FURTHER READINGS section for more information) over the rights of the states to protect the citizens from the million-man invasion (euphemistically referred to as the “demographic change”) of Mexican violators of the U.S. border, and yet they are so fast to declare the dereliction of their sworn duty that they so vigorously defended as their monopoly just a few months ago. As if the role of the Executive Branch of our government were to guard the interest of Mexican nationals (in the name of accommodating the supposedly inevitable “demographic change”) against any infringements, actual and hypothetical, by the American People and the Legislative Branch that the People have elected. Continue reading
The tax (or borrow) and spend “liberals” and the Democratic Party that they control are at it again: they threaten America that if the U.S. House of Representatives doesn’t push our country deeper into debt then the Obama administration will cut social security checks to the elderly, stop payments to the military fighting in Afghanistan and elsewhere, default paying interest on national debt, and do other nasty things that would inflict even more damage to our already already ailing country. The TV adds that the “liberal” elites are airing (I just saw one of Fox News) these days threatens that our children will suffer if they (the “liberals”) don’t have their way. Continue reading
Many, although not all, public sector unions became organized groups of extortion that use Liberal/Democrat lawmakers under unions’ influence and protection in order to deprive, via progressing taxation, hard-working Americans of the fruits of their work for the benefit of the unions’ members. The Liberal/Democrat lawmakers have no interest in resisting unions’ demands and just keep imposing more an more taxes on the public that apparently has no collective right to resist such a rip-off, or if the resistance against the tax hikes is stronger than the urge to tax, the lawmakers keep borrowing money in order to feed their unsustainable generosity for the public sector employees. Continue reading