The Bill of Rights is Missing an Amendment

One of greater problems that plague our federal government is that of cross-delegation. What do I mean by this?

I describe this phenomenon as such, owing to the fact that three branches of government are no longer “separate but equal.” As we see by the take-over of government by the federal judiciary, they are clearly the most powerful of the three. The other two branches, the legislative and executive, take to bended knee before them, and as blind mutes, comply with any and every decree. This was clearly not intended by the founders.

However, this cross-delegation can more accurately be described not as a seizing of power and authority of one branch from another, but as a voluntary giving of authority of one branch to another. The legislative branch, devoid of backbone, consistently surrenders its constitutionally mandated authority to the executive branch, giving the President authority he is not entitled to.

Unfortunately, as is often the case today, the three branches of government see the Constitution as nothing more than a conglomeration of gray areas to be interpreted as they wish. National Review described it as the, “disalignment of the various branches of government relative to what the Framers of the U.S. Constitution intended.”

The Constitution does specify the duties of the three branches and assumes that the branches would have the fortitude to carry out their specific duties. They apparently did not envision such a large collection of spineless weasels, eager to give their authority away rather than have to make hard choices.

These supposed gray areas in the Constitution are exactly the reason why the anti-federalists insisted on spelling out a set of basic individual rights in the Bill of Rights.

Fulfilling a promise to anti-federalists like George Mason, Patrick Henry and Samuel Adams, James Madison introduced his proposed nine amendments on June 8, 1789. The amendments were taken up by the House, and on August 24, the House voted in favor of presenting 17 amendments (first draft) to the states for ratification. Congress then forwarded the proposed Bill of Rights to the Senate. The Senate reduced those 17 to 12 (second draft) and on September 28, 1789, these 12 were submitted to the States for ratification. The process slowed to a crawl, which for something this important was the right tact. Finally, on December 15, 1791, the remaining 10 Amendments were agreed upon by three-quarters of the States and the Bill of Rights was born.

However, in retrospect, there was one original Article, that is desperately needed in today’s three-branch free-for-all environment. Sadly it ended up on the cutting room floor – didn’t make it past the second draft.

This was Article 16, which read:

The powers delegated by the constitution to the government of the United States, shall be exercised as therein appropriated, so that the legislative shall never exercise the powers vested in the executive or judicial; nor the executive the powers vested in the legislative or judicial; nor the judicial the powers vested in the legislative or executive.”

This one Article – this one short paragraph, would bring the entire federal government back into Constitutional alignment. The intent of this Article, or Amendment, could not be clearer – that no branch shall ever exercise another’s power, even if voluntarily surrendered to another. This one Article would put an end to the cross-delegation of authority, or “disalignment of the various branches of government.” It should be considered as the 28th Amendment to the Constitution.

Written by The Common Constitutionalist and published by iPatriot ~ April 19, 2018.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:

One thought on “The Bill of Rights is Missing an Amendment

  1. Fergus

    It means nothing. Rather prohibit the judiciary from changing any law but forcing any law it challenges back to the Congress for clarification. If the Congress refuses to alter, change or clarify a law challenged by the judiciary within 90 days, the president shall propose a new law which must be voted upon within 30 days. If nothing changes the law shall remain prior to the court’s challenge.

    Next, create a third chamber. This chamber alone shall be responsible for proposing new tax laws, but shall be appointed directly by state legislatures for terms not exceeding three years and limited to two terms. This chamber shall submit new tax laws directly for approval to the public every 4th year and must be approved by a 60% margin. As a corrollary, federal spending mus never exceed the intake of the federal government. If it does exceed in any given year the amount of the excessive amount shall be reduced fourfold in the next year, and double in the second year from the total budget. If the budget is exceeded three years in a row, all elected officials responsible from such reckless spending shall be removed from office and barred from ever holding any public office again. Federal employees responsible for over spending shall be terminated after three years of such excesses.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *