Powered by Max Banner Ads 

Fasciunism II: Chapter Four ~ Government and Politics

Our government and political system are both a long way from what our founders intended. Many of the founders felt that political parties would be a detriment to the type of government they were instituting. They were right. However, human nature being what it is, it was impossible to keep people of like thoughts and feelings on how the government should run and what they should do, to get together and form some sort of a political party. It began as the Whigs and Tories and has slowly evolved to Repulicrats and Demlicans. Okay, so it is supposed to be Republicans and Democrats. However, in today’s world it is sometimes very hard to tell the difference. Both parties, with the exception of a number of true conservatives, are both big government backers. The only difference between them is which of them gets to be the big government. In other words, in my opinion they are both arms of the Fasciunist party.

I believe that one of the reasons and possibly the main reason that the Founders did not favor political parties was that a person running for office on a part platform would be more beholden to the party and the money doners than they would be to the people and the constitution. Looking at the country today, they were absolutely correct. A true populist candidate, one whose main concerns are the constitution and the wants and needs of the people cannot toe the party line. This is exactly what happened in 2016 with Donald Trump. He never really was a true Republican, he ran as a populist and the people voted him into office. Too many aspects of running this great country cross party lines and cannot be pigeon holed into one party’s platform, no matter which party it is. Even the terms liberal and conservative no longer mean what they once did, at least not according to a dictionary definition of the two words. A truly liberal person would view the 2nd Amendment as allowing any citizen, as long as they are not a felon, or under indictment for a felony, to own any type of firearm they desired. This is the exact opposite of the way today’s so-called liberals see things. They would not only not allow such a thing; they are attempting to do away with the 2nd Amendment entirely.

The Founders wanted a limited Federal Government. We now have a very intrusive Federal Government and it is becoming more intrusive every day under the current Fascist leadership. Laws are passed by congress and then handed to the myriad of Federal agencies to be interpreted and enforced. These bureaucracies are put in place by politicians that do not want to be seen as they really are; self-perpetuating. Most of these bureaucracies have no place in the constitution, and should not even be in existence. This means that we are now being governed (ruled) by unelected, unconstitutional bureaucracies that answer to no one. Take a look at just a few of the more well known ones; DOD, DOT, IRS, CIA, OEO, EPA, OSHA, BATF, etc, etc. I could go on and on but I think you get the idea. I could probably fill this chapter with the acronyms and proper names of all of the federal bureaucracies that currently exist. These agencies enforce the rules and laws that they are given in any way they please. Many of these agencies are given firearms to make sure they can enforce the laws whether it is constitutional or not. Both Communists and Fascists used these very same tactics to obtain and keep control of the people. Whether we look at the KGB or the Gestapo, we find many of the same tactics now being employed in America. So, why here? It is a direct result of Fasciunism.

You see, most politicians, being cowardly, do not want to be associated with the laws that they pass. Most of them have one thing in mind from the day they are first elected, they want to be reelected. Thus, by turning the laws over to some faceless bureaucrat they distance themselves from the law. Part of this is our own fault. Some of us are pretty lazy about how we follow politics. I know very few people, other than myself, that follow and see how their representative and senators vote. These people vote strictly by party. They either pull the lever next to the R or the D. this is one of the reasons that the Fasciunists have been able to take over. Years ago, before the Internet, I can understand that it may have been difficult to follow all of the votes and I will admit that I was unable to get information on every vote. However, I did manage to get the info on the more important ones. Now with the Interned, it takes less than five minutes a day to get every vote. The average American is just too lazy and too apathetic to even take that little bit of time.

Another problem that I lay on the lap of lazy Americans is the fact that, even in a presidential election, it is hard to get even fifty percent to vote. Many times the ones that do vote are voting for a person for the wrong reason. Look at the last three elections and you will see what I mean. In 2008 and again in 2012 many people voted for B. Hussein O. to elect the first black president. We all know what a disaster that was. In 2016, over half the popular vote went to Hillary Clinton, mostly to elect the first woman to the presidency. Thank goodness for the Electoral College that ploy failed. While there are a lot of Fasciunists left in Washington, I do not believe Donald Trump is one of them.

The presidency of America would be a joke if it were not so tragic. Back in the eighteenth century, when our founders wrote the constitution the president was elected to serve the people. George Washington stated that two four-year terms were all any man should serve.

This seemed to work fairly well until the 1930s. Then FDR was elected to four terms and had he not died during the fourth term, I feel that he would have been elected again and again. His four terms were said to be because of WW II, but I believe he would have found another reason to continue in office. After FDR it was all downhill for the presidency. If you do not believe we have reached the point of dictatorship yet, here are some examples. The worst came to pass under Bill Clinton and that was just the beginning. When a sitting president is impeached by the House of Representatives for perjury and obstruction of justice, and the senate is afraid to convict him, that is the power of a dictator. Clinton admitted to lying under oath and yet he was not convicted. B. Hussein O. used his pen to make many laws. He was never called out for this even though all laws are supposed to come from congress according to the constitution. These are just two glaring examples of how we have drifted into a dictatorship. These two broke the law and were not punished. If a president can break one law and not be punished, he can break any law. That puts the president above the law and makes him a dictator.

Another thing to look at is sheer volume of executive orders and presidential directives are being used. Executive orders have always been a president’s prerogative, but starting with FDR they have been taken to a new level. These executive orders began to snowball under Clinton, continued snowballing under George W. and exploded under B. Hussein O. Obama even felt that he could sign treaties without the consent of the Senate. Even though it is unconstitutional to do so, he signed the Paris Accord and nothing was don about it. Trump had to undo it when he got into office. Even though congress could have countermanded these orders, they never did. That, boys and girls, is a dictatorship.

The president is always careful to point out that the things he does, the executive orders that he signs, are popular with the people. Most of that popularity is judged on the polls that the left wing media takes. When you go out on the street and talk to everyday people, you just might get a different take on things. When Hitler waged war, he did not ask anyone but the Germans were behind him all the way. The difference between a communist dictator and a fascist dictator is that the communist does what he wants and does not care what people think while a fascist dictator gets the people to believe he is doing the right thing before he starts and that whatever he does then is good for them and the country.

Right now we are engaged in two wars. We are fighting ISIS in Iraq and the Taliban and others in Afghanistan. Neither of these wars was declared with a declaration of war by congress. That means that we are technically at peace. Remember; “War is Peace.” If we are going to fight these wars, and we need to, to control terrorism, then congress needs to do their constitutional duty and declare war. Moving on to the third branch of government, we see more usurping of the constitution. This branch of government was needed necessary only to interpret the laws, not to make them. As you have probably discovered, I am talking about the judiciary here. The judges and the court system set up by our founders had very narrow parameters; to settle disputes by interpretation of the law. It is up to congress to set up the court system, this is the same congress that is supposed to make the laws. Judges on the federal judiciary are appointed for life and while it is possible to impeach them it is a rarity that it occurs. The judiciary has now taken over the writing of laws. At least most of the judges, especially those appointed by Democrats feel that they have the right to rule against the intent and sometimes the letter of the law. They seem to feel that they know better than the lawmakers in congress what is good for the country. This is a very common feeling among the left, liberals, progressives and Fasciunists. When congress is informed about these things the simply say that there is nothing they can do about it because it is a separate branch of government. Considering that congress is the branch that authorizes and establishes all federal courts except the Supreme Court, that seems like a cop-out to me.

Now, even the Supreme Court represents the Fasciunistic view. Due to several presidents installing court judges who share their Fasciunist goals, the high court by wild interpretation rather than by the letter of the constitution. A couple of cases come to mind to show what I m saying. The first is the roe versus Wade abortion ruling. In this case they made something legal that has been illegal since time began; murder. By using newspeak and renaming an unborn baby a fetus, they ruled that abortions are the right of a woman to choose. Back in the sixties, when the ruling was made, the people arguing for this so called right, used the argument that they were only talking about first trimester fetuses and abortions were needed because of rape, incest or to save the life of the mother. When I questioned what would happen when that expanded to from moment of conception to the moment of birth, for any reason, I was laughed at and made fun of. I was told that it could never happen in America because that would be murder. Thanks to ever changing newspeak, that is exactly what did happen. Now when I question pro-abortion people about what they think about the coming of post birth abortion, they laugh and say that it could never happen in America because it would be murder. There are already partial birth abortions and it is only a short step to join China in killing the baby after it is born alive, for any reason whatsoever. To me that is scary.

The second case is much more recent. When the Democrats in congress, without the vote of one Republican passed Obamacare, there were things about it that were unconstitutional. First you cannot force people to purchase something they do not want or need. Second, you cannot charge a fine for anyone that will not do so. Third you cannot take away the people’s choice of what they want. Yet the Supreme Court ruled that the fine was really a tax. Again, changing words to make them something they are not. This law is still on the books as I write this but hopefully this congress and this president will change that.

There are many other cases where our court system uses their judiciary power to unconstitutionally change laws to fit their plan. School prayer, flag burning, etc. these are just at the Supreme Court level. There are many other cases in the lower courts where laws are blatantly disregarded. Those people not having the money to further fight the case are stuck when an illegal decision is made. One recent case is the stay order on President Trump’s immigration ban. These left wing, Fasciunist judges used mis-interpreted statements from his campaign to order a stay. That in it itself is dead wrong especially it is the President’s constitutional right to issue such orders. This is done for the protection of the American citizens. These judges do not care what happens to the citizens as long as the terrorists can get into this country and tear it down.

As you can see, all three branches of government are in this together. We are being ruled by unconstitutional laws, passed by congress and passed on to be enforced by faceless bureaucrats; unconstitutional presidential executive orders that are overlooked by the congress and unconstitutional laws made or enforced by the courts.

While many people will tell you that these presidents, congress people and judges do not really know and understand what the constitution says and means. If this is true they should not be in the governmental positions they are in. However, I believe it goes much deeper than ignorance. I believe that they (at least most of them) know exactly what they are doing and that they are doing it intentionally. They are Fasciunists and they would like to turn this country into a Fasciunist dictatorship. They would like to take over the country and have one party rule, “Fasciunists.”

~ The Author ~
The author (Stephen J. Norling) is retired from the work world and does freelance writing. He has served in the armed forces and worked in various industries, has worked for both political parties and found them both to be lacking. After watching politics for a long time he came to all new conclusions and why he is warning people of the politics of this country. He has remained a (somewhat) regular contributor to the Federal Observer and Kettle Moraine Publications for these past seventeen years. We are glad to have him back – as accurate, angry and straightforward as a TRUE Patriot can be. Send the Knifeman an email with your comments.

Publisher’s NOTE: The two images embedded with the article, are the front and back cover for a multi-audio-tape album of Mr. Norling’s original 2000 book, “FasUNsim” which we were privileged to record in our studios in that year. Norling’s definitive rendering of TRUTH, which once and for all set the record straight about AmeriKa in that day – is bringing this horrid tale up to date in 2017. The original presentation was written and recorded during the closing days of the Clintonian Regime, its message continues to transcend all Administrations. ~ J.B.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *