To pee or not to pee; that is the question… Or is it?
So much commotion about who can use the women’s restroom leads one to believe that this is a real problem, when it’s not. Most people that I know are not concerned about where transgenders are allowed to go. Quite frankly, if it walks like a duck, talks like a duck, acts like a duck and pees like a duck, I’m not going to look up anyone’s skirt to check, and I’m fairly certain that no one else is either. Just don’t wag your groove thing at me or you won’t need that operation.
But this is not about who pees where. This is about erasing all personal boundaries. It’s about promoting an ‘anything goes’ attitude that demonizes those who choose privacy over political correctness.
Repeat after me…. ‘We are all the same.’ Yes, the same. No sexual differences, no mental differences, no good, no bad, no ugly. A monotonous herd of nondescript sheep, following the leader into the kill pen.
Like our political system of Republican vs. Democrat, the choice should not be one or the other: Either subject yourself to a free-for-all in the women’s potty or you must be a bigot and hate all gay men. This is complete idiocy. And yet, the debate goes on, courts fill up, newspapers print the controversy, lawyers make money, and the world spins to the tune of ‘I Just Wanna Be Me.’ Meanwhile, back at the potty, we just want to feel safe while doing our thing in what should be our most private area. But noooooooo. Can’t have that, now can we? At least not without the Potty Police. Just how low can the control grid go? Lower than a boa’s belly as it swallows its prey.
Government control. It’s insidious. It restricts our every movement. Like the hotwire strung around a pasture that does not need to actually be hot because the animals are trained to stay away from it after having experienced the shock. Mentally conditioned to respect the fence line. And that fence line represents the boundaries inflicted by the manufactured need to accept government control over every aspect of our lives. We are being programmed to respect the control that those in ‘authority’ exert over us when we accept the false narratives set in front of us as real and valid. When we expend our energy in fighting the ridiculous fight over something so simple even a 5 year old could understand it, we are playing into the game, and that game is called the Hegelian Dialectic – Problem; Reaction; Solution.
Problem: Women having their own bathroom in stores is unfair and discriminatory against the gay community.
Reaction: A huge ‘issue’ is raised regarding forcing store policy to allow men who identify as women to use the women’s bathroom. People become polarized over who should be allowed to pee next to Mom when she goes to town and shops at the nearest Target. There is outrage on both sides. Tempers flare, anger erupts, and ‘bigotry’ becomes the battle cry of the day.
Solution: The ‘gay’ issue is brought to the forefront and people are encouraged to accept that there are no boundaries, everyone is the same, and we choose which sex we are – chromosomes and genitalia have nothing to do with it. Just one big, sexless blob until we decide what to be. And those who choose to disagree will beg the government to intervene. After all, our privacy is at stake!
This appears to be why there is such a strong push to break into the women’s potty when no one would even notice anything odd about the gal next door if not for the five o’clock shadow. What business is it of the government’s to decide just who can pee next to whom? And why does it even want to? Why does a coyote eat chickens? Because that’s its nature. Governments seek control like ducks take to water because that is their nature.
So, what is the real solution to the potty problem? The issue would logically appear to hover around multi-toilet bathrooms since single toilet bathrooms already provide privacy via a locked door. So, how about three bathrooms? ‘Male,’ ‘Female,’ and ‘Neutral.’ Problem solved. Easy. Simple. No boundaries are crossed, women and children can feel safe while urinating, and those who forgot to shave can use the third option.
No muss, no fuss, no government intervention flushing our rights down the toilet, just let the people decide whom they want as potty mates. The businesses will either accommodate or lose customers.
Unless, of course, an actual solution is not the real goal of the dispute…
©2016 Barbara H. Peterson
Written by Barbara H. Peterson for FarmWars, May 16, 2016.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml