Dec 30, 1853: U.S. Southern border expands to present boundary

gadsden-purchase-mapOn this day in 1853, James Gadsden, the U.S. minister to Mexico, and Gen. Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna, the president of Mexico, cut a deal that turned over some 30,000 square miles of what is now part of southern New Mexico and Arizona to the United States.

The treaty, known as the Gadsden Purchase, was signed in Mexico City. It settled a lingering dispute over the demarcation of the border west of El Paso, Texas, by setting the final boundary between the two nations.

Jefferson Davis, the secretary of war under President Franklin Pierce, had authorized Gadsden to negotiate with Santa Anna for the land. It called for the United States to pay Mexico $15 million, or about $150 million in today’s dollars, although the purchase price was later cut to $10 million.

U.S. industrialists saw the need for a railroad linking the South with the Pacific Coast that skirted Western mountains. In also sensing an opportunity to build a key railroad through the region, Gadsden drove a hard bargain. At the time, the Mexican economy was going through a rough patch. The Mexicans desperately needed the money, leaving Santa Anna in a weak negotiating position. Still, the bargain revolted many Mexicans and led to Santa Anna’s downfall.

Gadsden was the grandson of American Revolutionary patriot Christopher Gadsden. In 1823, after a career as a U.S. Army officer, he was commissioned to help move Seminoles westward to reservations. While president of the South Carolina Railroad Co. from 1840 to 1850, he advocated construction of a transcontinental railroad via a southern route.

In 1861, capitalizing on the purchase, the chief figures behind the drive to build railroads through the West — Collis Huntington, Leland Stanford, Mark Hopkins and Charles Crocker — formed what became the Southern Pacific branch of the Central Pacific Railroad.

Written by Andrew Glass for Politico, December 30, 2015.

treaty mapFAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:

2 thoughts on “Dec 30, 1853: U.S. Southern border expands to present boundary

  1. The Publisher Post author

    Do you Reconquista Invaders understand that YOUR country was paid for this land. It was a treaty which was BOUGHT. Of course it lined the pocket of the ancestor of your current crooked leaders, Generalissimo Santa Ana – the same guy that got his ass kicked two weeks after 183 Texicans (some of Mexican descent) gave their lives for freedom at a little mission called, ‘Alamo.’

    Look at the second map at the bottom of the article and see what else YOUR government bartered and traded for (in many cases – in exchange for Mucho Dinero).

    Go home and take it up with YOUR countrymen.

    1. Osh

      ..ditto from me….good, timely article….everybody forgets about Gadsen…and everybody also seems to forget we took it away from Generalissimo “Low-Life” Santa Anna (“Antonio de Padua María Severino López de Santa Anna y Pérez de Lebrón”, hmm as in a knife fight, ever notice the guy with the biggest knife is the least man of the bunch..?).., just as we took it away from King “Low-life” George the Turd… At least Generalissimo “Low-ilfe” Santa Anna brought his army, and didn’t just send it as King “Low-life” George did… As far as the thieves and murderers of the Reconquista go, well, put them down right along side those other bunch of thieves and murderers demanding reparations for slavery… Might as well not leave out the redskins, er, indians, er, pardon me, the Native Citizens…if Obama and his ilk don’t leave this country pretty soon, I’m all for giving it back to the indians and letting them deal with “it”…


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *