49 thoughts on “Truth or Fiction:? The Great American Adventure

  1. Neal

    Took me a couple days to read it all but I just finished. A lot of it is stuff I’d heard before, but there was also a lot that is new to me. Some of it I found hard to accept, and I know if it is for me, and I am more agreeable to conspiracy theories than most, than I know for a fact that others won’t buy a word of it.

    Nonetheless, it was a very interesting read.

    Reply
  2. Lawrence Miller

    In my research, I discovered that the author’s name, Judge Dale, Retired, is a pseudonym. I have not been able to discover who the real author is. Is this important? Perhaps or perhaps not. We get alot of pseudonyms and cryptic author names today in this age of the internet. I guess the bottom line is the merit of the information presented and not so much who is saying it.

    Reply
    1. Michael Edward

      I have no problem with a nom-de-guerre being employed. Our Founding Fathers frequently authored works under another name.

      What’s at issue here with me is whether or not “Judge Dale” is actually a judge.

      What is purposed by prefacing a name with ‘judge’?

      The ramifications of the party being “Judge Dale” is different from those were he simply John Dale – American or as some believe: Rodney DALE Class.

      For this person to have been a member of a state BAR alerts me to the high probability of credibility coming into question simply by the nature of the trade practiced.

      Were that so, this “Judge Dale” may very well be an agent provocateur purposed to further certain mythology over truth. Specifically which truth or mythology, I do not know with certainty.

      Anyway, it’s a good read and for me an enjoyable read to further support what I’ve suspected to be true all along. But, just because this message comes from “Judge Dale” doesn’t make it credible. Point in fact; if the author of this work is actually Rod Class, then I highly expect it to be true and accurate. I don’t know Rod Class personally. I’ve spoken to him a time or two. From my investigations, I find his work very much on point. Rod Class is an American Patriot. Make no mistake about that!

      Reply
  3. snoop4 truth

    “Judge DALE” is actually “Rodney DALE Class” a self-styled, pro se litigant with a high school education who was NEVER a judge. For more information on this elaborate hoax, go to JudgeDaleHoax.com.

    Reply
    1. snoop4truth

      “Judge DALE” is actually “Rodney DALE Class”, a self-styled, pro se litigant with only a high school education who was NEVER a judge. Despite NEVER going to college or to law school and despite NEVER being a real lawyer or a real judge, Rodney DALE Class has developed an entire belief system about the law and the legal system that he teaches to hundreds of devoted followers.

      We have no quarrel with Rodney DALE Class or with the belief system that he teaches using his own name. He can believe what he wants to believe and he can teach what he wants to teach using his own name. What we oppose is that Rodney DALE Class’s belief system is actually being peddled to the public using “Judge DALE’s” name. That is fraud. Fraud harms the public. It is that fraud that we oppose. Thus, our complaint is with the charlatans who are actually behind the “Judge DALE Hoax” itself, not with Rodney DALE Class or with his belief system.

      As it turn out, some of Rodney DALE Class’s more devoted disciples were so enamored and spellbound with his belief system that they decided to mass-market his writings (reflecting his belief system) by fraudulently telling the public that they were written by a retired federal judge named, Judge DALE (using Rodney DALE Class’s middle name, “DALE”, as an inside joke). Among the forged (fake) documents that these charlatans fraudulently claimed were written by this fictional (fake), “Judge DALE”: include: “Lawfully Yours”; “The Matrix And The US Constitution” and “The Great American Adventure”. Needless to say, the charlatans behind the “Judge DALE Hoax” peddle these fake (and proprietary and copyrighted) forgeries on their own personal websites so as to drive internet traffic there, so as to gain notoriety and stature among their newly-duped victims and to win favor with their own website advertisers.

      That would have been bad enough, but some of the charlatans behind the “Judge DALE Hoax” go even further and meticulously and methodically quote these forged (fake) documents (that they know were actually written by a self-styled litigant with a high school education) on radio shows, in seminars and on YouTube videos with a reverence reserved only for holy scriptures. Their public performances in this regard are worthy of an Oscar. In so doing, these charlatans purposely and intentionally dupe and defraud hundreds if not thousands of their listener/viewer/victims into believing in something that is, in reality, nothing but a an elaborate hoax. In these public performances, these charlatans always direct their listener/viewer/victims to their own personal websites to download these forged (fake) documents that they fraudulently tell their victims are valid “source documents” about the law and the legal system. It is an utter disgrace.

      We did not expose the “Judge DALE Hoax” in order to expose the identities of the charlatans behind it. They know who they are. We did not expose the “Judge DALE Hoax” to harm the charlatans behind it. That serves no useful purpose. Our sole purpose in exposing the “Judge DALE Hoax” is to help reduce the catastrophic damage that these charlatans continue to purposely and intentionally inflict upon their victims by perpetuating this hoax upon them every single day. The victims of these charlatans simply wanted the truth, but instead, all they got from these charlatans was their lies and their contempt.

      Form more on this elaborate hoax, Google “Judge DALE Hoax”.

      Reply
      1. Larry Miller

        All the comments I have seen on the publication titled ‘The Great American Adventure’ has focused on the authenticity of the authors name. Personally I do not care what the authors name is, what difference does it make? Many authors past and present use pseudonyms. It is not the name given to the author of a work that is important. What is important is the actual work its self. Does the work have merit? Is it true? Is it supported by known fact or just thrown out as a vague belief? Look across the internet, in forums, chat rooms, on websites (et.al.) countless people use fake names. Look at the people who post comments to this current topic at hand they are using fake names, why? Why don’t they use their real names?

        It’s not the name that is important, nor the title someone may throw behind the name used but the information. Focusing on something as trivial as a name and forgetting the work presented behind that name becomes a distraction. So why don’t we leave the name thing behind us and focus our attention to the merit of this person’s presentation. Wouldn’t that be more productive?

        Just a few of my thoughts tooking through this thread.

        Larry Miller – Santa Clarita, Californnia (real name and real location)

        Reply
  4. snoop4truth

    Larry, I agree with you that in some instances, the name of the author ALONE may not be important. But, as you and I (and everyone else) knows, a fake name ALONE is NOT actually what we are dealing with here. So, let’s be perfectly clear about this. Nobody is complaining about a mere fake name ALONE. A fake name ALONE would have been fine here. But, that is NOT what we are dealing with here. You know it. I know it. Everybody else knows it.

    The charlatans behind the “Judge DALE Hoax” here did not simply attribute the belief system of one high school graduate to another high school graduate with a different (fake) name. If this were what the charlatans actually intended to do, then they would have simply attributed Rod Class’s belief system to “DALE Smith, a high school graduate”. But, they did not do this here. They knew that trading the name of one high school graduate for another here would not have served their purpose of perpetuating a real, true fraud upon the American people. So, contrary to your suggestion, this hoax is not analogous to “Samuel Clements” calling himself “Mark Twain” in authoring “Huckleberry Finn”. You know it. I know it. Everybody knows it.

    No. Instead, here the charlatans behind the “Judge DALE Hoax” did not simply create a fake name ALONE. They went much, much farther. Here, they created a fake, non-existent author who they knew the American people would mistakenly trust (to their detriment), a fake person with a college education, a fake person with an additional law school education, a fake person who passed the state bar exam(s), a fake person who passed the state character and fitness exam(s), a fake person who practiced law for years, perhaps decades, a fake person who was nominated by the President of the United States for a position of honor and trust on the federal bench and a fake person who held that position for exactly 12 years before resigning to become a “whistle blower” about “fraud” about the law and the legal system. Such an elaborate hoax is considerably more than a creating fake name ALONE. It is about this particular fraud, far in excess of a fake name ALONE, that we complain. So, this is NOT simply about a fake name ALONE. Our complaint is about everything else (except for the fake name). You know it. I know it. Everybody else knows it.

    What I am saying is that the charlatans behind the “Judge DALE Hoax” themselves do not agree with you that the identity of an author is irrelevant. If they did agree with you (that the identity of an author was irrelevant), then the “Judge DALE Hoax” would not have been necessary in the first place. But, the charlatans behind the “Judge DALE Hoax” knew that by creating a fake, non-existent person with a formal legal education, formal legal experience, and a formal legal position of honor and trust in the federal government (none of which Rod Class has) and by fraudulently attributing Rod Class’s belief system to this fake person, they would thereby successfully dupe the American people into believing in something that they would not otherwise believe (if they knew the true source of the information was a person who barely made it through high school).

    There are essentially two types of people surrounding this issue. There are those people who buy into the Rod Class belief system and who want others to buy into it too. To these people, there is no such thing as too many lies or too much fraud, so long as the lies and fraud help sell the belief system at issue to the American people. On the other hand, there are those Americans who simply want to know the truth about the law and the legal system. These people simply want the truth from knowledgeable, reputable sources, sources who will not lie to them, dupe them or defraud them. These people are truth seekers. They simply want the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. To these people, any lie is too much and any fraud is too much fraud. You may belong to the former group of people. I belong to the latter group of people. To me, honesty, character and integrity matter in all things at all times. Unfortunately, the charlatans behind the “Judge DALE Hoax” do not.

    And, since you contend that the issue is the work itself (and not the identity of the author), let’s take a look at the work itself. According to courts that have actually addressed the “legal” theories that “Rodney DALE Class” teaches to his devoted followers (whether using his real identity as a high school graduate or his fake persona as “retired federal Judge DALE”), the courts say, and I quote, these theories are “patently ludicrous”, are “bizarre”, are “delusional”, are “nonsense”, are “non-sensicle’, are “humorous”, are “quasi-legalese’, are “pseudotheor[ies]”, are “unintelligible”, are “utterly incomprehensible”, “purport to cite legal principles that either do not exist or are…wholly inapplicable”, have been “struck down consistently by the courts”, are universally “rejected by the courts”, “should be rejected summarily”, “have “consistently been rejected”, “have been summarily rejected”, “have been squarely rejected”, are “routinely rejected”, have “no support in law and have been soundly rejected”, are “wholly baseless”, are “completely frivolous”, are “wholly frivolous”, are “legally frivolous”, are “devoid of merit”, are “meritless and frivolous”, are “factually and legally frivolous”, are “frivolous”, are “completely without merit”, are “patently without merit”, “lack merit”, are “wholly inapplicable”, are “irrelevant”, are “entirely inapplicable”, are “inapplicable”, are “totally unrelated”, have “no…relevance”, are “contrary to established law”, are “simply wrong”, have “no conceivable validity in American law”, have “absolutely no legal basis”, have “no legal basis”, are “without legal significance”, are “without any legal support”, have “no support in the law”, “lack an arguable basis in either law or fact”, are “unimpressive”, have “no sound basis” in the law, “do not come close to establishing a meritorious defense”, are “a waste of their [the litigant’s] time as well as the court’s time, which is paid for by hard-earned tax dollars” and “a waste of court resources”. Many of the forgoing quotes from judges are not only from cases that have actually addressed Rodney DALE Class’s “legal” theories, they are actually quotes from Rodney DALE Class’s own court cases themselves.

    Thus, whether the issue is the truth about the qualifications of the of the real author of the works or the merit of the works themselves, the forged (fake) documents at issue here reflect a hoax (fraud) as to the qualifications of the real author and the works themselves reflect legal theories with a value befitting the colorful descriptions of the courts quoted above.

    Reply
    1. Larry Miller

      Countless times throughout your diatribe you stated, “But, as you and I (and everyone else) knows” Since you already know everything including what everyone and myself knows there is no where else to go so I bid you a good day.

      Reply
    2. Michael Edward

      Dear Anonymous ‘Snoop4Truth’

      The fact that you used in the above missive: “legal position of honor and trust in the federal government” is, by itself, sufficient for me to understand that it is YOU who should be identified and scrutinized.

      The truth is the matter is those who seek work in the federal government do so for the purpose of gaining power over others and to enlarge their personal holdings.

      All one has to do is look at the net value of a freshman entering the House or the Senate and look at their net value at the end of their term. Then, compare that “enlargement of personal holdings” with the enlargement of personal holdings of the average American.

      The other thing that bothers me about your writings is the length and the depth with which you expend so much energy to castigate Rod Class – if it be true that he is, actually, Judge Dale. Someone speaking The Truth simply states The Truth and moves on. Someone who spend so much time and energy to “sell” The Truth has always been a Red Flag for me.

      Regardless, to each their own.

      Michael Edward
      http://www.AmericansRestoringAmerica.com

      Reply
  5. dane hansen

    – Barry Ovomit. fake names, fake SSA # . sealed education records . everything fake or hidden. Everything.

    Reply
  6. snoop4truth

    “Rodney DALE Class” pretends to be “Judge DALE” in connection with FAKE legal articles that “expose” FAKE legal information that are posted online. Respectfully, fraudulently impersonating a “retired federal judge” is not the same thing as using a pen name. If the people behind the “Judge DALE Hoax” really wanted to merely use a pen name, then they would have used a pen name like “John Smith”. But, they did not. Here, they used a fraudulent TITLE (not merely a name). In so doing, they were fraudulently representing that the author of the “Judge DALE forgeries” was intelligent, literate, educated, qualified, experienced, honorable and otherwise knew what he was talking about, all of which is exactly backward to the truth. Class is NONE of those things. So, when it comes to non-fiction literature, the true identity of the author does matter. And, the readers of such non-fiction are entitled to know the truth about the education, credentials and experience of the author.

    A real “retired federal judge” would actually know the law and the legal system. Rodney DALE Class knows nothing about the law and the legal system. He only knows about the amateur belief system about the law, an imaginary alternative to the real legal system that is actually used by the courts in the real world. The problem is that the amateur belief system about the law is not real. It exists solely in the vivid imaginations of the amateur legal theorist and nowhere else. It is entirely FAKE, like a fake religion.

    This is the real reason that CLASS HAS LOST EVERY SINGLE CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (39 CONSECUTIVE COMPLETE LOSSES AND STILL COUNTING). If Class’ claims in the “Judge DALE forgeries” about the law and the legal system were actually true, then he would not have lost every single case in which he has ever been involved.

    No person with a 100% failure rate in the courts should be impersonating a “retired federal judge”, holding themselves out as a FAKE, pretend, unlicensed “attorney”, posing as a “law enforcement officer”, masquerading as a “legal scholar” or purporting to form a world government. You read that correctly. Before you buy in to the delusional amateur belief system that Class peddles about the law, there are some other things that you should know about Class.

    Class pathologically imitates everything that he claims to hate.

    Class pathologically imitates law enforcement officers (something that claims to hate). Class frequently wears a fake, yet official-looking law enforcement uniform (complete with cap) bearing fake, yet official-looking markings and emblems falsely indicating that he is a “private attorney general” (a legal term that he does not comprehend) and a 14th amendment, section 3 “bounty hunter” (to look like a law enforcement officer). Class even drives a used Jeep that he has affixed with fake, yet official-looking markings, emblems and decals on the doors and elsewhere falsely indicating the same amateur nonsense that he has on his uniform (to make his used Jeep look like a law enforcement vehicle). Class was actually convicted of outfitting his fraudulently marked used Jeep with a real police “blue light” manufactured for use by law enforcement agencies which could be operated by the Jeep’s electrical system (to make his used Jeep look like a law enforcement vehicle).

    Class pathologically imitates a “retired federal judge” (something that he claims to hate). Class pretends to be “Judge DALE” in connection with FAKE legal articles that reveal FAKE legal information online. (The FAKE name “Judge DALE” uses Class’ middle name, “DALE”, as an inside joke).

    Class pathologically imitates real, licensed attorneys at law (something that he claims to hate). Class erroneously claims to be a “private attorney general” (a legal term that he does not comprehend) and unsuccessfully attempts to represent his victims in court and causes them to always lose their cases. For two of the many examples of Class’ unsuccessful attempts to pathologically imitate real, licensed attorneys, read Class’ court losses in: In Re Carl Pertuset; Vera Pertuset, Debtors, 492 BR 232, Case no. 11-15607, United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, Decided March 5, 2012 (Rodney DALE Class is not a licensed attorney at law and may not represent persons in court even if he calls himself a “private attorney general, nothing about the “private attorney general doctrine” authorizes non-attorneys to represent persons in court”); In Re Carl Pertuset; Vera Pertuset, Debtors, Case No. 12-8014. Bankruptcy Appellate Panel 6th, Circuit, Decided December 18th, 2012 (same). Both cases are available on Google Scholar for free. Class actually has the nerve to charge his victims $1,000 for “training” as to how they can become a “private attorney general” (which Class fraudulently tells them is some type of fake, unlicensed, pretend, “attorney” that is authorized to represent others in court). This is so even though Class himself has never “represented” anyone in court and even though Class has NEVER been and is not now a “private attorney general”.

    Class pathologically imitates people in world government (something that he claims to hate). Class, along with others unfamiliar with the real legal system used by the courts, have purported to form a fake world government, fake new legal system and a fake court that they call the “International Tribunal Of Natural Justice”, an imaginary alternative to the real courts. This imaginary new fake legal system would allow Class to imitate real licensed attorneys and represent people in this new fake court. Class would himself, help write all the laws. (So much for the republican form of government).

    Psychologists could have a field day analyzing Class’ delusional behavior and amateur belief system.

    This is the truth about the real author of the “Judge DALE forgeries” that you misguidedly defend. Do not develop “Judge DALE-Stockholm Syndrome”. You are being lied to, pure and simple. You are being defrauded. You are being duped. Do not catch yourself defending the very people who are intentionally playing you for a fool.

    The truth is that there are conspiracies out there that harm the American people that are real (ex: the federal reserve, fractional reserve banking, false flag operations, etc.). But, the legal conspiracies reflected in the “Judge DALE forgeries” are not real. It is not true that jurisdiction is a matter of consent, that fringe on flags altesr the jurisdiction of the court, that all governments are private, for-profit corporations, that attorneys and judges swear an allegiance to the Queen of England, have a foreign title of nobility and act as collection agents for the Rothschilds and the Vatican, capital letters do not refer to a straw man and their is no imaginary trust account that you can access to pay all of your debts.

    As of today, the most current information about the “Judge DALE Hoax” is posted on Amazon.com. Go to Amazon.com. Go to the “book” posted there entitled “The Great American Adventure” allegedly written by “Judge DALE” (Rodney DALE Class). Go to the book review written by snoop4truth. The footnotes to that book review have information not yet available elsewhere on the web.

    Reply
    1. Larry

      Well, regardless of the intent behind the author’s use of the publication name Judge Dale it has had a beneficial effect in getting people to think, that is a good thing.

      It occurred to me that there could be more to this name thing than any of us have heretofore thought of. The assumption has been made by everyone that the publication name Judge Dale actually is, actually was, or is pretending to be a judge as in a court of law. Let me throw this out for consideration – what if the authors first name is Judge and that Judge is not a title but a real legal name? Just something to think about perhaps. Things are not always what they seem at first glance.

      Larry

      Reply
  7. snoop4truth

    Larry,

    The people behind the “Judge DALE Hoax” (the people who actually re-wrote, published and distributed the original “Judge DALE forgeries”: “Lawfully Yours”; “The Matrix And The US Constitution” & “The Great American Adventure”) have already admitted to us that Rodney DALE Class is the real author of the forgeries that they themselves actually re-wrote, published and distributed using the fake name, “Judge DALE” (which uses Rodney DALE Class’ middle name, “DALE”, as an inside joke). This is the REAL reason that you have never seen a photo of “Judge DALE”, heard a recording of “Judge DALE” or seen a live appearance of “Judge DALE”. “Judge DALE” does not exist.

    If more be necessary, Rodney DALE Class’ filings in court contain the same exact words, phrases and mistakes that appear in the original “Judge DALE forgeries” (The “Clearfield Doctrine”; “Bond v. U.S.”, etc.).

    On the subject of the “merits” of the contents of the “Judge DALE forgeries”, there is simply not a single word of truth in them.

    It simply is not true that all governments and all governmental agencies are private, for-profit corporations (something akin the Federal Reserve, which is privately-owned, but which is not a government agency). While corporations have undue influence over legislatures’ creation of statutes, it is not true that statues themselves are mere “corporate regulations” that do not apply to “flesh and blood” persons. It is not true that federal law has no application outside the territorial limits of Washington D.C. and other federal territories. It is not true that a defendant can avoid a court’s jurisdiction by refusing to “consent” to that court’s jurisdiction (Jurisdiction is established by constitution and by statute. Consent is not required). It is not true that capital letters refer to a “straw man” (Capital letters are intended to make that text stand out from the rest of the text because capital letters are larger and easier to read.). It is not true that “yellow fringe” on a flag in the courtroom somehow changes the court into a different kind of court or somehow changes the nature of the laws that apply in a given case (The nature and power of a court to decide a case is determined by constitution and by statute, not by court room décor). It is not true that judges and courts are collection agents for international bankers and the Vatican (So, there is no connection between you being given a traffic ticket and the Rothschilds and the Pope getting richer). The UCC only applies in UCC cases, not to traffic or criminal cases, for example. Maritime and Admiralty jurisdiction only applies to maritime and admiralty cases, like a trade dispute among shippers on the high seas, and then only in federal court, not in a state court (So, if you are charged with a crime in state court or sued in state court, it is legally impossible for such a case to be an admiralty or maritime case). It is not true that attorneys swear an oath of allegiance to a “foreign” head of state, that the term, “esquire” is a “foreign” “title of nobility” bestowed on attorney by a “foreign head of state”, so as to make attorneys ineligible for office in the United States under the “original 13th amendment” (The overwhelming majority of the authors of the constitution and the overwhelming majority of the authors of the “original 13th amendment” were themselves attorneys. Thus, they did not regard themselves as a threat to the United States, they did not regard themselves as unfit to hold office and they did not write the “original 13th amendment” to disqualify themselves from office). It is not true that international bankers pay lawyers and judges under the table to cause litigants to lose there cases. It is not true that there is a secret “trust” account in your name at the Federal Reserve with hundreds of millions of dollars in it that you can access and spend to pay off all of your debts at will. If you have any understanding to the contrary, you are sorely mistaken.

    Reply
    1. michael-james: cable

      yes im afraid that the courts are like that. i have been through their quasi hoops this past year, after i went to prison for a crime i did not commit, and what i have studied leads me to the conclusion. as well as all the lawyers and public defenders ive spoken with, and their demeanor when i speak from references. i dont care who class is. ive listened to him, but i do my research and then if the time permits i practice. these lawyers and bankers are stealing everything with quasi statutes. statutes do not mean laws. read your law dictionary. maybe youll discover what the term color of law is. and then maybe you should research the bar association, and find out what the bill of indemnity is within that dictionary. these frauds are taking advantage of the people using admiralty, which by the army books that set the standard, is the gold fringed flag. so i think you should mind your own business. people need to know what lawyers and bankers will not tell or disclose for their own job security. how the hell did job security even some into play when peoples property is being taken by corporate authority and not by the dictates of common law. youre a shill

      Reply
    2. R. VIncent Bert

      Having gone through the Federal Criminal System and finally convicted of non-violent felonies, ferreting out the nuances of the legal system, the BAR and jurisdiction whoever Judge Dale is is totally correct. The historical missives going back to the origins of the country and who did what to whom may or may not be accurate and conjecture only. On the whole, however, there is a cabal which plays nations and governments and they are virtually untouchable. They are called by many names and their authority may be derived from a single or multiple sources but they do, indeed, exist and it doesn’t take but simple logic to see it. We are governed by forces that seem to us to be absurd and violate our basic understanding of Law and the Constitution and even ethics. Nonetheless, these actions, agendas and movements are easily proved to be be not to be in our interests and cater to a very few. I attribute 80%+ to the Jew, however one wants to define them. I have written extensively and researched them along with those who have the same take and world view. I believe that this is fact in evidence and irrefutable.

      Reply
  8. snoop4truth

    Who Is “Judge DALE”?

    “Judge DALE” is a hoax. The people behind the hoax have already admitted it to us. This is the reason that you have never seen a photograph, video or live appearance of “Judge DALE”. He does not actually exist.

    There are actually two different people who have fraudulently impersonated “Judge DALE” online and they write about two entirely different subjects.

    “Rodney DALE Class” is the original “Judge DALE” (which uses his middle name, “DALE”, as an inside joke). Class is an amateur legal theorist with barely a high school education who was never a judge. Class and his “editors” first began fraudulently impersonating the “Judge DALE”, a fake “retired federal judge” in 2009 (a federal felony).

    All of the fake “Judge DALE” articles that appear online on the subject of the “LAW” were written by Class and his “editors”. All of the fake online articles that appear online on the subject of “DINARS” were written by the late John MacHaffie, who died on January 8th, 2015.

    Here is how it came to be that there were two fake “Judge DALES”. Between 2010 and 2012, the original people who actually created the “Judge DALE Hoax” (“editors”) organized and edited Class’ amateur belief system about “the law” into the two original “Judge DALE” forgeries: “The Matrix And The US Constitution” (April 10th, 2010) and “The Great American Adventure: Secrets Of America” (sometime before May 25th, 2012). These “editors” posted these two original “Judge DALE” forgeries on their own websites.

    Afterwards, these “editors” solicited other likeminded webmasters who would agree to post (or to post links to) these two original “Judge DALE” forgeries on their own websites with full knowledge that these forgeries were fake. These likeminded webmasters played an important role in the “Judge DALE Hoax”. Indeed, two of these webmasters were so enthusiastic about their role in the hoax that they themselves actually wrote and posted additional fake articles online in which they claimed to “know Judge DALE personally” and wherein they purported to quote dialogue that they exchanged with this fictional character (who does not actually exist).

    Arguably, the most important of the likeminded webmasters who distributed the “Judge DALE” forgeries was the late John MacHaffie of nesaranews.com. MacHaffie posted articles on his own website on a broad range of subjects. But, he was passionate about the subject of investing in “DINARS” (a gold-backed currency used in some middle-eastern countries) and related subjects like global currency re-set/revaluation and non-disclosure agreements (which MacHaffie claimed were necessary when investing in “DINARS”) . Many people regarded MacHaffie as a genuine authority on the subject of “DINARS” and he had followers reading his “DINAR” articles all over the globe. MacHaffie did not write about the subject of the law. And, Class did not write about the subject of “DINARS”. So, Class and MacHaffie were not competitors for the same readers. Thus, Class’s material and MacHaffie’s material were compatible and Class’ material seemed to be a good fit on MacHaffie’s website, nesaranews.com.

    At first, all went well with the “Judge DALE Hoax”. Readers of the “Judge DALE” forgeries on the websites of these like-minded webmasters actually believed that “Judge DALE” was a real person and that he really was a “retired federal judge”. Readers of the “Judge DALE” forgeries believed the false claims reflected therein about “the law” and the legal system. And, nobody outside of the “editors” who originally created the “Judge DALE” forgeries and the likeminded webmasters (who distributed the forgeries) knew that the whole thing was one giant hoax intended to defraud the American people.

    By 2012, the “Judge DALE Hoax” had become an unqualified success. The fictional character, “Judge DALE”, had become a genuine brand-name with real value among amateur legal theorists, largely as a result of the efforts of these likeminded webmasters, like MacHaffie (who distributed the “Judge DALE forgeries” to his own readers).

    But then, in late May or very early June, 2012, the “editors” who originally created the “Judge DALE Hoax” stole some proprietary information from MacHaffie about “DINARS”, posted it on the websites of MacHaffie’s competitors and fraudulently attributed that stolen information to “Judge DALE” (who MacHaffie knew did not actually exist and who MacHaffie had actually helped make into a genuine internet sensation).

    Needless to say, MacHaffie was livid. In retaliation, on June 4th and 5th, 2012, MacHaffie did two things. First, he posted a formal notice on his website, nesaranews.com, that read, “Judge DALE Is Removed From This Blog” and, without revealing that “Judge DALE” was a hoax, he explained his reasons for banning “Judge DALE” from his website (explained above). Second, and more importantly, MacHaffie actually stole the fake name, “Judge DALE”, for his own use in peddling his own online articles about “DINARS” and he posted his very first “DINAR” article online as a SECOND “Judge DALE”. This theft and use of the fake name, “Judge DALE”, served several purposes for MacHaffie. First, it taught Class’ editors a lesson about stealing the intellectual property that actually belonged to others (he simply returned the favor by doing the same thing to them). MacHaffie knew that Class’ editors could not complain publically about what MacHaffie had done to them without revealing their own role in the “Judge DALE Hoax”. Second, MacHaffie’s theft and use of the fake name, “Judge DALE”, had the effect of confusing and confounding “Judge DALE’s” original followers and thereby weakened the value of the “Judge DALE” brand among amateur legal theorists. Third, MacHaffie’s theft and use of the fake name, “Judge DALE”, increased the number of readers of MacHaffie’s articles on “DINARS”. MacHaffie continued to use the fake name “Judge DALE” in connection with his own online articles on the subject of “DINARS” until his death on January 8th, 2015. He never forgave Class’ editors for what they had done to him.

    This is why since June 4th, 2012, there have been two authors of the online forgeries that have been fraudulently attributed to “Judge DALE”, not one. This is also why there are no “Judge DALE” forgeries that were posted online which relate to the subject of “DINARS” until after June 4th, 2012. This is also why, since June 4th, 2012, the “Judge DALE” forgeries posted online address two entirely unrelated subjects (the subject of the LAW and the subject of “DINARS”). This also explains why “Judge DALE”, an alleged “retired federal judge” would, on June 4th, 2012, inexplicably start writing articles about “DINARS”, a subject about which no real “retired federal judge” would have any interest, knowledge or expertise anyway. This also explains why there is such a profound difference in the quality of the writing between the two types of “Judge DALE” forgeries that appear online. Those “Judge DALE forgeries” on the subject of the LAW that appear to have been written by a high school student (as edited by other high school students) were written by Class and his editors. Those “Judge DALE forgeries” on the subject of “DINARS” (global currency re-set/re-valuation and NDA’s) that appear to have been written by an intelligent, articulate, educated, literate person were written by the late “John MacHaffie. This is why no new “Judge DALE” forgeries on the subject of “DINARS” have been posted online since MacHaffie’s death on January 8th, 2015. Finally, this is why new “Judge DALE” forgeries on the subject of the LAW continue to be posted online despite MacHaffie’s death (Class and his “editors” remain alive to post new “Judge DALE” forgeries online about the subject of the LAW).

    Either way, there is no real “retired federal judge” who wrote any of the “Judge DALE” forgeries that appear online. Either way, “Rodney DALE Class” was the original “Judge DALE” and was the namesake for the fictional online character, “Judge DALE” (which uses Class’ middle name, “DALE”, as an inside joke). Either way, “Judge DALE” is a hoax. Either way, all of the online articles that are fraudulently attributed to “Judge DALE” are also hoaxes.

    Reply
  9. snoop4truth

    Courts have already made rulings on amateur legal theories, like those peddled by Rodney DALE Class.

    If you would actually like to know THE LAW on amateur legal theories, like the “split personality”, “capital letters”, “straw man”, “flesh and blood person”, “birth certificates, “social security numbers”, UCC, “redemptionist” and “sovereign citizen” theories, then the decisions below are for you.

    (Note: Unless otherwise indicated, the cites below are to Google Scholar, not to reporters published by West Publishing Company. So, go to Google Scholar, key on case law, and key in the case number, dates (without parentheses) and the party names. Google Scholar is FREE and easy to use).

    A. Ferguson El v. State, Civil Action No. 3:10CV577, United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division (August 18, 2011)(discussing the following amateur legal theories: “redemptionist theory”, “SPLIT PERSONALITY theory”, “gold standard” theory and explaining that redemptionists believe that the government “pledged the strawman of its citizens as collateral for the country’s national debt” and explaining that “redemptionists claim that the government has power only over the strawman and not over the live person”, discussing “flesh and blood persons” theory, “birth certificates” theory, “capital letters” theory and summarizing as follows: “In short, [the defendant] seeks to avoid the consequences of his criminal conviction by suggesting HE EXISTS AS TWO SEPARATE LEGAL ENTITIES” and holding that such amateur legal theories are “legally frivolous” and have “absolutely no legal basis”).

    B. McLaughlin v. CitiMortgage, Inc., 726 F.Supp.2d 201, No. 3:09CV1762(MRK), United States District Court, D. Connecticut (June 11, 2010)(discussing the following amateur legal theories: “redemptionist theory”, the “SPLIT PERSONALITY theory”, the “strawman” theory,”flesh and blood person” theory, ”birth certificate” theory, “social security numbers” theory, “capital letters” theory, use of “strawman” as “collateral for the country’s national debt” theory, ”UCC filing statements” theory, “UCC financing statements” theory, “sovereign” theory, “imaginary account number to some sort of direct treasury account” theory and summarizing as follows: “redemptionists believe the flesh and blood person can draw against the funds earned by the strawman” and dismissing the case).

    C. Muhammad v. Smith, No. 3:13-cv-760 (MAD/DEP), United States District Court, ND New York, (July 23, 2014)(discussing the following amateur legal theories: the “SPLIT PERSONALITY” theory, “strawman” theory, “redemption” theory, “capital letters” theory and holding that those amateur legal theories “have not only been rejected by the courts, but also recognized as frivolous and a waste of court resources”, that they have “no conceivable validity in American law”, are “legally frivolous”, are “utterly frivolous” and “patently ludicrous”).

    D. United States v. Harding, Civil Action No. 7:13cr00008, United States District Court, WD Virginia Roanoke Division (May 1, 2013)(discussing “capital letters”, “commercial law”, “sovereignty”, “jurisdiction” and “natural living person” and holding that such amateur legal theories have “no support in law”, “have been soundly rejected”, are “erroneous as a matter of law”, “have been struck down consistently by the courts”, are “completely without merit”, are “patently frivolous”, “will be rejected”, are “simply wrong”, are “contrary to established law” and holding that “the use of capital letters in the caption of the indictment is irrelevant to the issue of … jurisdiction” and “rejecting the argument that use of capital letters in [the] indictment refers to a corporation [and] not a living person” ).

    E. United States v. Hoodenpyle, Criminal Action No. 09-cr-00013-MSK, United States District Court, D. Colorado (June 30, 2009)(discussing amateur legal theories about: “capital letters”, “jurisdiction” and holding that these amateur legal theories have “been repeatedly rejected by EVERY court to consider” them and describing these amateur legal theories as “wholly frivolous”).
    .
    F. Defluiter v. Land, No. 1:10-cv-421, United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division (June 15, 2010)(discussing the “capital letter” amateur legal theory and describing it as “quasi-legalese”, meritless and frivolous”, holding that it “lacks merit”, is “wholly baseless”, and holding that it “lacks an arguable basis in law and in fact”, etc.).

    G. United States v. Benabe, 654 F.3d 753, Nos. 09-1190, 09-1224, 09-1225, 091226, 09-1227, 09-1251, United States Court Of Appeals, Seventh Circuit (Argued March 28, 2011, Decided August 18, 2011)(discussing the defendant’s characterization of himself as a “secured party creditor…third-party intervenor” and as a “born sovereign flesh and blood human being and a secured party creditor” and discussing “individual sovereignty” theory, “immunity from prosecution” theory and “capital letters” theory and holding that such amateur legal theories have been “repeatedly rejected” and rejecting “the ‘shop worn’ argument that a defendant is sovereign and is beyond the jurisdiction” of the courts and holding that such amateur legal theories have “no conceivable validity in American law” and that they “should be dismissed”).

    H. United States v. Mitchell, 405 F.Supp.2d 602, No. CRIM AMD 04-0029, United States District Court, D. Maryland (December 19, 2005)(discussing the following amateur legal theories” “capital letters” theory, “flesh and blood man with a soul” theory and “jurisdiction” theory and holding the defendant’s amateur legal theories are “patently without merit” and stating that these amateur legal theories “would be humorous-were the stakes not so high” and holding that these amateur legal theories are “irrelevant” and “have been summarily rejected” by other courts).

    I. United States v. Rodney Class, Crim. Action No. 13-253 (GK), United States District Court (April 16, 2014)(discussing Class’ amateur legal theories about: “capital letters” theory, “fictional entity” theory, “registered trade name” theory, Uniform Commercial Code” theory, his false claims that he is “private attorney general” [which term actually means a “public-interest plaintiff” and which status ends at the end of the case], his false his claims that statutes “apply only to business entities, government instrumentalities and other corporate’ persons’, but not to natural persons such as himself” [citing, as support, the “United States Tax Code”, the “Texas Administrative Code” and the “Delaware Administrative Code”], his false claims that the following laws are defenses to the criminal charges against him: the “Smith Act”, the “Administrative Procedure Act”, the “Hobbs Act”, the “Taft-Hartley Act”, the “Federal Reserve Act”, the “oath of office of public employees”, sections of the “Code of Federal Regulations”, the “National Industrial Recovery Act”, the “Emergency Relief Appropriations Act”, the “Clearfield Trust Doctrine” [which Class also cites in the “Judge DALE” forgeries], the irrelevant definition of “handgun” contained in the irrelevant “National Firearms Act” [which he was NOT charged with violating], “Executive Order 6174 on Public Works Administration”, the “Classification Act of 1923″, and describing Class’ filings as “utterly incomprehensible” and holding that they “purport to cite legal principles that either do not exist or are provisions of civil law [that are] wholly inapplicable to this criminal case”, and holding that Class’ purported defenses “are irrelevant”, “inapplicable”, “totally unrelated”, “entirely inapplicable”, have “no apparent relevance”, “unsupported and irrelevant”).

    J. Gibbs v. Hickey, Civil Action No. CV209-082, United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Brunswick Division (may 13, 2010)(discussing “capital letters” theory and the “Coram Nobis” theory and holding that such amateur legal theories re “nonsense” and “completely without merit”).

    K. United States v. Beavers, No. 3-12-CR-49, United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, Knoxville (December 13, 2012)(discussing the defendants’ claims that they are a “flesh and blood sentient man and woman and not a corporation or corporate entity” and their theories on “capital letters” and holding that the courts have “rejected this argument as frivolous” describing such amateur legal theories as “completely frivolous” and “without any legal support”).

    L. United States v. Singleton, No. 03 CR 175, United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division (May 6, 2004)(discussing the following amateur legal theories: “”flesh and blood man” theory, “jurisdiction” theory ,“capital letters” theory,“corporate entity” theory and discussing “accounts for U.S. citizens” at the Federal Reserve or the U.S. Treasury and holding that such amateur legal theories are simply “bizarre”, “make…no sense”, and should be “rejected”).

    M. United States v. Majhor, Civil No. 10-544-MO, United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division (September 1, 2010)(discussing the following amateur legal theories: “fictitious entity”, “capital letters” and holding that these amateur legal theories are “routinely rejected”, “patently frivolous” and are hereby “stricken”).

    N. United States v. Heijnen, 375 F.Supp.2d 1229, No. CR 0302072 JB, United States District Court (January 14, 2005)(discussing the following amateur legal theories: “capital letters” theory, “fictitious entity” theory and dismissing the case).

    O. Burnell v. Scutt, Case No. 1:11-CV-573, United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division (July 13, 2011)(discussing the following amateur legal theories: “capital letters” theory, “separate or fictitious entity” theory and holding that the petitioner “does not state a meritorious claim”).

    I have dozens and dozens of more case cites on this subject, but you get the point. The foregoing cases ARE THE LAW, not amateur legal theories. Every single person who has every relied on amateur legal theory in court HAS LOST. In court, your opponents use REAL law against you. In order to win in court, you must use REAL law against your opponents. FAKE law (like amateur legal theories) do not have any effect on REAL law. This is why Rodney DALE Class has LOST EVERY SINGLE CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (39 CONSECUTIVE, COMPLETE LOSSES AND STILL COUNTING). Suggestion: Only take legal advice from a person who has actually won at least ONE CASE.

    Reply
  10. snoop4truth

    NOTICE:

    I HAVE UPDATED THE LIST OF CASES ABOVE.

    THE LIST NOW HAS THE ACTUAL LAW ON “YELLOW FRINGE” (ON FLAGS IN THE COURTROOM) AND “THE RIGHT TO TRAVEL” (WITHOUT A LICENSE OR REGISTRATION).

    SEE THE NEW LIST ON SUIJURISFORUM.COM UNDER THE “STRAWMAN” THREAD.

    SUIJURISFORUM.COM ALSO HAS THE DETAILS OF MACHAFFIE’S ROLE AS “JUDGE DALE” UNDER THE “JUDGE DALE” THREAD. THAT INFO APPEARS NOWHERE ELSE ON THE WEB.

    THE NEW LIST APPEARS ON SUIJURISFORUM.COM

    Reply
  11. snoop4truth

    “PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL”

    As of today, the most current information about LAW ITSELF on the subject of whether “ROD CLASS” is a “PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL” appears on beforeitnews.com on several threads in response to several notices announcing a school for alleged training in to become a “PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL” to be taught by “ROD CLASS” .

    Go there. Each comment to each such notice is different. So, read them all.

    Reply
  12. kisa b

    After reading this and how HARD SNOOP4TRUTH IS attempting to convince, gives even more credibility to judge dales story. Why has he lost every case in court.well..If everything he is saying is true..it’s because the courts are owned by the United States of corporations. Everyone knows it’s easier to say something isn’t true, you don’t have to prove anything. But time and again I find legal references that what he is saying is true. Court cases, court documents…As for myself, to be clear, my ancestors came here long before the American revolution. Lived as neighbors with daniel boone. Fought and died in many wars including the American revolution. There are even books written about my ancestors . NO ONE can deny that there are many CORRUPT CHANGES TAKING PLACE IN THIS COUNTRY, and no one in the corporate world is being prosecuted for the crimes against the American people. For you to be denying snoops4truth any thing relevant..tells me you are the one attempting to lie and perpetuate the deception. Divide and conquer eh? The missing 13th amendment can be found by googling 13th amendment journals of the Senate 1810 pg 503 I believe. You should do some actual research instead of getting on here and claiming fallacies without actually researching.

    Reply
    1. michael-james: cable

      yeah this guy is spending too much time on this feed trying to disuade good people. i listen and watch, and from my experience i know what is going through the criminal courts system. ive spoken with penty of lawyer, public defenders. and none of them are taking what i do as a joke. i just got a corrupt judge in indiana fired, or whatever because she was afraid of an affidavit that i used which quoted the federal law for deprivation of rights. i was charged with a felony for that document. i got arrested for a misdemeanor and after i filed that document it became a felony intimidation. all you have to do is go to the capitol buildings and speak with these people after you have done some research and you can see their cold breath because they are scared of the truth. i always get kicked out of the irs building, social security doesnt want to talk to me about the fraud. so i deal with and from personal experience. and im not trying to be a guru. god put us here to experience truth. and sometimes it hurts, many times it saves

      Reply
  13. Alkemist1

    I have to tell you that this information has greatly benefited me and who cares if his real name is judge dale or someone else, as long as the info is stimulating and factual, albeit talking about this great country of ours the United States of America. Deep down i think most of us who are intelligent knows that everything is not what it seems and you cant take things in our legal and courts system at face value. but the level of corruption that is and has been going on since our forefathers is mind boggling and i cant really buy into snoop4truth , this person is going extremely hard fighting for this corrupt system and trying to keep the American people hood winked. I am more in line to follow kisa b, …thanks for validating my point……wake up America……

    Reply
  14. snoop4truth

    Hello Kisa B.

    Thank you for your interest in this very important subject, the truth about the law and the legal system.

    Yes, I have tried hard to bring the truth to those who have been duped and defrauded by the “Judge DALE Hoax”. Yes, I have tried hard. Attractive lies are not easy to overcome. It takes a pound of unattractive truth to counter an ounce of attractive lies. So, it takes work.

    In your post, you indicate that you have legal references, court cases and court documents that you contend support “Judge DALE”s” claims about the law and the legal system. I’m sure that all of us would be very interested in seeing them. So, please post all of them (or cites to all of them) right here for all of us to see. I have provided proof of my claims by providing the list of cases listed above. Please do the same for all of us.

    Yes, I agree with you that corporations are corrupt and that they have an undue influence over our government. But, telling the American people lies about the law and the legal system will not fix that problem of corporate corruption. Telling the American people lies about the law and the legal system only creates a second problem..

    I realize that “Judge DALE’s” lies are attractive to believers. But, that does not make them any less of a lie. They are still lies. It is not an act of “deception” for me to reveal a lie for what it is. The reality is that there are serial liars on both sides of the “corruption” argument. If you believe that the government and corporations have a monopoly on lying, then you are mistaken.

    Respectfully, my revealing the truth about “Judge DALEs” lies may make me unpopular with believers of “Judge DALE’s” lies, but it will never make me “deceptive” or a “liar”. The truth is the truth, regardless of how unpopular it may be.

    Reply
  15. snoop4truth

    Hello Alkemist1,

    Thank you for your thoughts above.

    I respectfully disagree with you in certain respects. You have not “greatly benefited” from being lied to, no matter how popular the lie may be. Lies, fraud and hoaxes only benefit the liar, the fraud and the hoaxer. Lies, fraud and hoaxes do not benefit the “victim” who believes in them. Lies, fraud and hoaxes “greatly burden” the victim, not the other way around. Lies, fraud an hoaxes weaken the victim.

    I agree with you that the claims made in the “Judge DALE Hoax” are “stimulating” (in a delusional kind of way). But, the claims made in the “Judge DALE Hoax” are certainly not “factual”. Do not confuse the two.

    At the risk of stating the obvious, the bearer of truth is not your enemy. The bearer of lies is your enemy. We would all do wise to keep that reality clearly in mind.

    Reply
  16. snoop4truth

    Dear Kisa B,

    I apologize. I failed to reply to all of your comments in my last post. I continue my reply as follows:

    Respectfully, I am not trying to “divide an conquer” anything or anyone. The truth is not a game. Lies divide us. Truth unites us. Lies weaken us. Truth strengthens us.

    When I learned the truth about the “Judge DALE Hoax”, I could have done nothing and thereby become complicit in the hoax myself. But, I did not. My conscience would not allow me to do that. My concern for the victims of the hoax was too great. So, I revealed the lies, the fraud and the “Judge DALE Hoax” for what they were. And, who do you think I did that for? Me? How would I benefit from being hated by all of the believers of a lie? Clearly, I would not. No. I revealed the “Judge DALE Hoax” for your benefit and for the benefit of all of the other victims of the “Judge DALE Hoax”. That’s right. I revealed the massive fraud of the “Judge DALE Hoax” in an effort to help the very victims that hate me for doing so now, including you. You may hate me for it now, but the reality is that I have still nevertheless armed you with the truth, strengthened you with the truth and empowered you with the truth. Whether you accept the truth is up to you. I have done my part. My conscience is clean.

    As to the original (or missing) 13th amendment, I regret to inform you that the conspiratorial interpretation of the original 13th amendment is also a hoax. Yes, the proposed 13th amendment was real, but it had nothing to do with so-called “B.A.R. attorneys” or “esquires”. If ratified, the original 13th amendment would have prohibited REAL “titles of nobility” which are usually INHEREITED (King, Queen, Prince, Princess, Duke, Duchess, Baron, Baroness), not “occupational or educational titles” which cannot be inherited and which must be EARNED (doctor, professor, engineer, attorney, judge, etc.). And, I think we can all agree, there is nothing “NOBILE” about an attorney. For a truly great discussion of the “original 13th amendment hoax” and the “B.A.R. attorneys hoax”, go to goldismoney2.com and read the entire “Judge DALE” thread on that website. You will be glad you did. I don’t have time to duplicate that information here. But, I can assure you that both sides of the debate are well-represented there. Read it and draw your own conclusions.

    As to your criticism that I have not done any research before posting my rebuttal information online, allow me to remind you that as between you and I, am the only one of us who has actually posted proof of my research online (see above). If you would simply scroll up, may be able to see some of that research for yourself. Where I differ from others who claim that they have done research into the law and the legal system is that I research both sides, but I only post the actual law itself. I do not post amateur legal theories about the law and the legal system online (because that material isn’t the law and is, in fact, not even real).

    If being hated by you and the other victims of the “Judge DALE Hoax” is the price that I must pay for empowering them with the truth, then I will gladly pay it. Your well-being is worth that price to me.

    Reply
  17. michael-james: cable

    all you need to know about lawyers comes from the rules for admission and discipline of the bar association of your state. read their oath to not oppress the people. and what is a quasi crime? its oppression.

    now order yourself a black law dictionary fifth edition and look up bill of indemnity. i tried to ifnd it on the net but no luck. i have the law dictionary right here if youre curious snoop. ive been homeless for three years, i lived in a van for one of those years until it was stolen and took possesion of by and through fruad of the bmv rules. their corporate rule dont apply to my private property, all of which was my home.

    these qusi crimes have given me so many felonies i cant even get a job because i cant even get to fuckin work unless i walk a thousand miles. thats ludicris. thats like saying ive made nothing but bad choices. and i should just die because there are no handouts to get to work. to provide for yourself. i cant even think about my kids, because im too busy trying to get to a point where i can even eat.

    and i served this country. i have a degree. all of it means nothing when i cant even live by the declaration of independence and be in touch with life liberty and happiness

    so you need to shut your damn mouth snoop. because you dont know what the hell youre talking about. you have all the cases for badmouthing someone. what about kemper v state. theres a case right there that lets people like you know the we the people are sovereign.

    why dont you do something productive instead of being so far up someones ass you can set your cup down.

    by the way, i was born on the fourth of july. i take this personal. and why youre at it look up the definition of property. it includes our garaunteed liberties from the common law constitution. so you and your friends had best look out for me. right now im in valley springs california my friend

    Reply
    1. michael-james: cable

      thanks for your offer, im too independent to accept anything. ive lived on my own since i was sixteen and know the ups and downs of getting money. right now im in the middle of nowhere and dont have the accesses that i had in the city.

      if i can over come this by doing what i was born to do then eventually i will be fine. but what ive lost could never be replaced. trust me the story gets worse. ive only touched on the legal aspect. i wasnt trying to detract from the topic.

      but i will say that, the STATE, put me in a predicament where my own family stole my possessions. and i lost everything i worked for and saved, for most of my life. its a very funny story just to show how far drug addicts will go to feed their needs.

      i got out of prison and was at the point where i had to ask the same family for a place to stay for the night. and they were all like “theres no room” just so i could wait until the homeless shelter was open. the same shelter that acts above the law against the immunities. and that was a christian shelter who treated everyone like slaves. so i ivestigated them with the secretary of state and found thier errors.

      but then, even the hospitals are the same way with the corruption. with not being registered to do business in the state since the turn of the melinium. which goes against the state codes.

      my only downfall is my children. every heirloom, beit the thing sin my fathers pockets to gifts from my mother was lost. so, i ask, what is the price to be governed by a society who only cares about a profit? isnt doing what is right a profit? instead of just trespassing over everyones rights because everyone is too stupid to be truely active and productive for the future of their own kids.

      i see why there are so many gang members with ten “babies mommas”, and why everyone is hooked on crack and heroine. its disgusting. and like ive told the judges and lawyers i feel there is no need in being alive if this is the best we get in america.

      it is sad snoop. it makes me feel very shamful as if i started all of this. because no matter how much i know i can help. its just not worth it to do something for a mass of people who never learned how to appreciate the breath god gave them.

      and, no im not afraid to tell people where im at. i keep trying to fix the prosecutors mistakes, but it would be better to die or leave the planet because everyone who played their part against me would have to pay and that would effect their kids. i have trouble with wanting to do what i should do using the courts because i dont want to be the one who causes children misfortune because of some dumbass being arrogant of a job to do.

      thanks again

      Reply
  18. snoop4truth

    Michael,

    Your story depresses me.
    I am totally bummed out.
    If you change your mind, my offer stands.
    Is there anything at all that I can do to help?
    Snoop

    Snoop

    Reply
    1. michael-james: cable

      i have to assume you are female with your verbage. i think your sweet for an attempt at kindness towards me. if youre not i can only say i appreciate your courage.

      ive been depressed for an extremely long time, and it is a pain. so please dont feel bad for me. my story is unique and even the lawyers think i got a bum deal. i choose not to share my story for any pity but to share in the courage to be true for the reasons we are born.

      there is no amount of praying, or faith to be happy. that is just something we have to urge ourselves to be in preparing for the future and unfolding events. im not trying to get into personal issues on this forum. and im not trying to intrude on your studies. obviously it took you much time to gather your intuition.

      i should be in prison right now but the experience ive had in trying to figure out just how to take care and protect my kids. and what it means to be sovereign. thankfully i am not. after i take care of those corrections of simulated legal practices hopefully i can still keep my integrity, and move on.

      im not even sure how possible it is. im not religious, but i believe in the proper words of the bible. and the verse “with god everything is possible” keeps reminding me. and the story of Job and his faith. those keep me going. even though i may not want to live, it is not my choice to give up what i did not create.

      so i think that defines my character.

      i think its funny you offered to help. not to be offensive. but everything i calculate to get back on track would be absurd to even ask or try.

      my aunt and uncle own a construction business. and when i got out of prison i asked them to help get a car. not just to get around but to have a refuge from being around people i didnt like. and they refused like it was unheard of for them to do, even when i knew they had the money.

      they are the ones who i came to stay with now for the winter. and now i think i should stay but everything is so far apart it hard to know when things will pass. but really it doesnt scare me, but there is nothing back in indiana for me. the people who love me are dead.

      the others just want what i get lol. or their jealous and envy my intelligence. after all we all use ten percent of our brains, rights? i suppose i just use the part that matters. what is that to envy?

      thanks again, and keep smiling

      Reply
  19. snoop4truth

    Michael,

    Thank you for your kind words.

    My offer still stands.

    I can’t afford to buy you a car.

    But, I can help with something.

    Snoop

    Reply
  20. snoop4truth

    Update: As of today, RODNEY DALE CLASS HAS LOST OVER 65 CONSECUTIVE CASES AND STILL COUNTING. So, much for the value, merit and accuracy of “Judge DALE’s” claims about the law and the legal system contained in the “Judge DALE forgeries”. Rod Class, and his own court record, is living proof that amateur legal theories (fake laws) do not have any effect in the real legal system actually used by the real courts in the real legal system in the real world. If you would like to lose your case too, then follow Rod Class’ advice.

    Reply
  21. snoop4truth

    ROD CLASS & THE “DEBRA JONES HOAX”
    Part 1

    INVESTIGATOR “SPILLS THE BEANS” ON LEGAL HOAXES AND FRAUDS

    Rodney DALE Class (“Rod Class”) is an amateur legal theorist who barely got through high school. Rod Class has lost EVERY SINGLE ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (WELL OVER 65 CONSECUTIVE, COMPLETE LOSSES AND STILL COUNTING). Despite a year long investigation, we have not yet found a single case that Class (or Class’ side) ever won. The reason that Class has a 100% FAILURE RATE INTHE COURTS is because he uses amateur legal theories (FAKE laws) as if they were REAL laws. If Class’ amateur legal theories (FAKE laws) were actually valid, then Class would not have LOST EVERY SINGLE ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (WELL OVER 65 CONSECUTIVE, COMPLETE LOSSES AND STILL COUNTING). No person with a verifiable 100% FAILURE RATE IN THE COURTS should be impersonating or otherwise posing as a “teacher”, “legal scholar”, “retired federal judge”, “Private Attorney General”, “Bounty Hunter” or some such other nonsense.

    Reply
  22. snoop4truth

    Part 2.

    But more importantly, Rod Class is also a “PROFESSIONAL HOAXER”. Class is behind the “judge DALE Hoax” in which he write FAKE legal articles that reveal FAKE legal information while fraudulently impersonating a FAKE “retired federal judge” named “Judge DALE” (which uses his own middle name, “DALE”, as an inside joke). (Note: Impersonating a “retired federal judge is a federal felony”.). Class is also behind the “FOURTH Administrative Ruling Hoax”, the “Property In Other Peoples’ Names Hoax”, the “Private Attorney General Hoax”, the “Embezzling Federal Funds Hoax”, the “CRIS Hoax” and many more legal hoaxes. Class uses these hoaxes to help him “SELL” his amateur belief system about the law to other gullible amateur legal theorists. But, most important for purposes of this comment, Class is behind the “Debra Jones Hoax”

    Reply
  23. snoop4truth

    Part 3

    Class has his own internet radio show on AIB radio network. Class uses this show to sell his amateur belief system to other enthusiast amateur legal theorists. On July 8th, 2014, Class purported to bring on a “LEGAL INSIDER” to his radio show in order to validate and to provide support for his own amateur legal theories. Class FRAUDULENTLY introduced this FAKE “legal insider” as “FORMER REALL ESTATE ATTORNEY” and “FORMER LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER”, “DEBRA JONES”. As if those FRAUDULENT claims about Debra Jones were no bad enough, Debra Jones herself FRAUDULENTLY claimed that she was once “being groomed by the Police Benevolent Association to be the President Of The United States” (an office that Class himself once purported to run for as a “write in candidate”). (In an apparent effort to cover all the bases, Debra Jones has since added the titles “Dr.” and “ordained minister” to her resume’.).

    Reply
  24. snoop4truth

    Part 4

    Not surprisingly, during this 2 hour 43 minute show, this FAKE “legal insider” named “Debra Jones” mindlessly “parroted” the same amateur legal theories and the same utterly delusional claims about the law and the legal system that Rod Class himself makes. Rod Class’ radio audience was understandably shocked and horrified by the FAKE, FALSE and FRAUDULENT claims of Debra Jones, who they believe was real “legal insider” who was telling them the truth. This FRAUDULENT radio show became an internet sensation and was re-posted and commented upon all over the web, much to the delight of Rod Class and Debra Jones.

    Reply
  25. snoop4truth

    Part 5

    THE TRUTH
    But, before Class put Debra Jones on his internet radio show, Class already knew that Debra Jones was NEVER a “former real estate attorney” and NEVER a “former law enforcement officer” and that she was NEVER “being groomed by the Police Benevolent Association to be the President Of The United States.” The truth is as follows:
    1. Debra Jones’ REAL name is “Debra Jenks Jones”;
    2. Debra Jenks Jones was born on May 29, 1967;
    3. As of today, Debra Jenks Jones is 49 years old;
    4. Debra Jenks Jones actually lives at (REDACTED) XXXX XXXth Street Court, Puyallup, Washington State, 98375-6130 and has lived there since April of 1995. (This is the reason that Debra Jenks Jones seems to hold a lot of her seminars CONVENIENTLY in or near Yelp, Washington State (right down the street from her home);

    Reply
  26. snoop4truth

    Part 6

    5. Debra Jenks Jones’ social security number (REDACTED) is 531-80-XXXX;
    6. Debra Jenks Jones HAS NEVER HAD A PROFESSIONAL LICENSE OF ANY TYPE FROM ANY STATE. This means that Debra Jenks Jones NEVER AN ATTORNEY (a person who would have had a “professional license” from at least one state at least at some point in the past). This is the reason that Debra Jenks Jones will not reveal the name of the law school from which she allegedly received her law degree. No such law school exists. This is also the reason that Debra Jenks Jones will not reveal the name of the state or states which allegedly issued her a license to practice law. No such state exists.
    7. Debra Jenks Jones was NEVER a “law enforcement officer” or “police officer” in any jurisdiction. This is the reason that Debra Jenks Jones will not reveal the name of the law enforcement agency or police department where she was allegedly employed as a “law enforcement officer” of “police officer. Such an agency does not exist. Such a department does not exist.

    Reply
  27. snoop4truth

    Part 7

    8. Debra Jenks Jones was NEVER “being groomed by the Police Benevolent Association to be the President of The United States. This is the reason why Debra Jenks Jones will not reveal the many names of the many people within the “Police Benevolent Association” who allegedly “groomed” her, the times and places where she was allegedly being “groomed” and the manner in which she was allegedly being “groomed”;
    9. Debra Jenks Jones’ false claims to the effect that she grew up in Washington, D.C. and that she was a “former congressional aid” to a conveniently DEAD congressman (to make verification impossible) in the “nation’s capitol” was a self-glorifying fraud intended to throw investigators off her trail as well as serving as an inside joke (because she actually lives in Washington State, NOT Washington, D.C.):
    10. Debra Jenks Jones’ published business address on one of her three known websites is “55 Santa Clara Avenue, #220B, Oakland, California, 94619” and is a fraud intended to throw investigators off her trail. This FAKE address causes people looking for her to futilely look in the State of California, rather than in the State of Washington, where she actually lives and operates:

    Reply
  28. snoop4truth

    Part 8

    11. Debra Jenks Jones’ published phone number on one of her three known websites is “(360) 458-6678”. The fact that Debra Jenks Jones lives in Puyallup, Washington State is the reason that the area code for Debra Jenks Jones’ phone number is “(360)”. Area code “(360)” is NOT the area code for Oakland, California (her FAKE published business address) or Washington, D.C. (where she falsely claims to have grown up). Instead, area code “(360” is the area code for that portion of Washington State south of Tacoma WHERE PUYALLUP, WASHINGTON STATE IS LOCATED (and where Debra Jenks Jones has lived since 1995);
    12. Debra Jenks Jones operates three known FRAUDULENT websites in order to FRAUDULENTLY solicit money from her victims; KnowMore-Laws.com; TrustUSproviders.com and ProTrustAcademy.com;
    13. As a complete OUTSIDER to the REAL law and the REAL legal system, Debra Jones has no “inside information” about the inner workings of the REAL law and the REAL legal system to share with you or with anyone else. Her claims about herself and about the law and the legal system are a complete and total fraud. When you think about it, the “Debra Jones Hoax” and the “Judge DALE Hoax” have much in common. Debra Jones concocted FAKE TITLES AND FAKE CREDENTIALS for herself to use in peddling her amateur belief system about the law in exactly the same way that Rod Class concocted FAKE TITLES AND FAKE CREDENTIALS for himself to use in peddling his amateur belief system about the law;

    Reply
  29. snoop4truth

    Part 9

    NOTE:
    It is a federal felony to use a means employed in interstate commerce (like the internet or telephone) to commit fraud (like illegally soliciting and collecting money from victims for “voodoo law” seminars by fraudulently claiming to be a “former real estate attorney” and/or a “former law enforcement officer”). It is a state crime to impersonate and attorney. It is also a state crime to impersonate a law enforcement officer. It is a state crime in many states to impersonate a “Dr.” and/or a clergyman (like an “ordained minister”).

    NOTE:
    Jean Haines of https//:jhaines6.wordpress.com did much to publicize, re-publish and perpetuate the “Debra Jones Hoax” among her own readers/victims. She wrote a glowing article and lavished heavy praise on this FAKE “legal insider” named, Debra Jones and posted it on her website. In response to that article, dozens of Ms. Haines readers/victims wrote to her and asked for background materials and contact information on Ms. Jones. Ms. Haines did not provide that requested information to her reader/victims. So, in late 2015, we attempted to post an early draft of this very comment among the other comments on Ms. Haines’ website providing her readers/victims with answers to the very questions that they had asked Ms. Haines for. But, during the “moderation” process, Ms. Haines saw fit to block this comment from being posted (or otherwise caused this comment not to be posted there). In so doing, Ms. Haines thereby prevented her readers/victims from receiving the true facts about the “Debra Jones Hoax” that are contained in this comment, facts that those readers/victims had specifically asked her for.

    Reply
  30. snoop4truth

    Part 10

    CONCLUSION:
    Everything that Rod Class has EVER told you is as true as his claims to you that Debra Jones is a “former real estate attorney” and a “former law enforcement officer”. The reality is that Rod Class is so desperate to “SELL” his amateur legal theories to you that he will not hesitate to lie to you and to defraud you if doing so will help him “SELL” his amateur legal theories to you. It is sad. Needless to say, if you paid Debra Jenks Jones hundreds or thousands of dollars for one or more of her “voodoo law” seminars in the belief that she was a “former real estate attorney” and a “former law enforcement officer”, then you were defrauded and ripped-off. You should demand a refund of the money that Debra Jenks Jones has taken from you under false pretense and/or contact the law enforcement authorities. Lying to the American people about their law and their legal system is an act of treason against the American people and should be treated accordingly. Rod Class and Debra Jones should be ashamed of themselves for this FRAUDULENT and VICIOUS ATTACK upon the American people. Both of them should immediately and publically apologize to the American people for what they have done to them and both of them should immediately discontinue their pattern of fraud upon the American people.

    Reply
  31. snoop4truth

    Part 11

    CONTACT DEBRA JONES
    If you are among the dozens of people on https://jhaines6.wordpress.com who still wish to reach Debra Jenks Jones, the FAKE “former real estate attorney” and the FAKE “former police officer” who intentionally lied to you and intentionally defrauded you on Rod Class’ internet radio show, you may attempt to do so by using the following contact information:
    1. Call her at her published phone number that appears on one of her three known websites of “(360) 458-6678”;
    2. Look her up and write to her at her Puyallup, Washington State home address (we will not publish that information online):
    3. Email her at her published email address of debra@protrustacademy.com;
    4. Write to her at her FAKE published business address at TrustUP(sic)providers.com, 55 Santa Clara Avenue, #220B, Oakland, California 946120 (and hope that you letter gets forwarded to her at her REAL address in Puyallup, Pierce County, Washington State);
    5. Try reaching her through any one or more of her three known websites: KnowMore-Laws.com, TrustUSproviders and ProTrustAcademy.com;
    6. “LightInDarkness” a senior writer on Quatloos.com, claims that Debra Jenks Jones once announced that she could be reached at culinaryjones@gmail.com and at (323) 642-8277. So, you might consider trying those avenues;
    7. Contact Jean Haines at her website of https://jhaines6.wordpress.com and ask her for Debra Jenks Jones’ REAL contact information;
    8. Contact Rod Class and ask him for Debra Jenks Jones’ REAL contact information.

    Reply
  32. snoop4truth

    ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH

    Snoop4truth is a legal expert who opposes the New World Order, globalization, corporatism, The Federal Reserve, fractional reserve banking (which is pure fraud and theft), false flag operations, endless wars and the contamination of our air, water food and natural resources.

    Snoop4truth opposes the mainstream media and legal disinformation for precisely the same reason, the people behind both disseminate intentionally false and fraudulent information in order to advance their own agenda at the expense of the American people who they claim to serve.

    Snoop4truth did not expose the “Judge DALE Hoax”, the “Debra Jones Hoax” or the falsity of Rod Class’ claims about the law and the legal system to harm Rod Class or Debra Jones. INSTEAD, SNOOP4TRUTH EXPOSED THE “JUDGE DALE HOAX” THE “DEBRA JONES HOAX” AND THE FALSITY OF ROD CALSS’ CLAIMS ABOUT TH LAW SOLELY TO REDUCE THE CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE THAT SUCH INTENTIONAL FRAUD INFLICTS UPON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE EVERY SINGLE DAY.

    HAD IT NOT BEEN FOR ROD CLASS’ ROLE IN CREATING AND PERPETUTATING THE “JUDGE DALE HOAX”, SNOOP4TRUTH WOULD NOT HAVE EXPOSED THE “JUDGE DALE HOAX” OR THE FALSITY OF ROD CLASS’ CLAIMS ABOUT THE LAW AND THE LEGAL SYSTEM.

    THERE IS A WORLD OF DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIST MAKING AN INNOCENT MISTAKE ABOUT THE LAW ON ONE HAND AND A CHARLATAN MANUFACTURING AN ELABORATE HOAX INTENDED TO DEFRAUD THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ON THE OTHER HAND. SNOOP4TRUTH WILL ONLY EXPOSE THE CHARLATANS BEHIND THESE ELABORATE LEGAL HOAXES THAT ARE INTENDED TO DEFRAUD THE AMERICAN PEOPLE (INCLUDING THE ORDINARY AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIST VICTIMS OF THESE HOAXES). THIS IS THE REASON THAT SNOOP4TRUTH HAS ONLY EXPOSED THE “JUDGE DALE HOAX” AND THE “DEBRA HOAX”. THESE HOAXES WERE NOT INNOCENT MISTAKES. THEY WERE INTENTIONAL FRAUD. SNOOP4TRUTH HAS NO QUARREL WITH THE ORDINARY AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIST. SNOOP4TRUTH WILL NEVER EXPOSE OR OTHERWISE HARM THE ORDINARY AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIST. THESE PEOPLE MAY BE MISTAKEN ABOUT THE LAW, BUT THAT DOES NOT MAKE THEM CHARLATANS. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE.

    Reply
  33. Red_October

    to snoop4truth …
    I have been reading all the postes concerning this Judge Dale and some other creatures of some sort, each with their own views … true, there are a lot of false information out there, and some of us do get mis-lead and go chasing after what we think is a rabbit, like a hunger coon hound, only to discover to our dismay that its not a rabbit, but a …. ! … since we R on the subject of dishonesty, let me be very frank with U all … Our own Uncle Sam boys R not always truthful to us. In the past few days, since the shooting of the 50 people in FL, I have been doing some research, to find the truth, and in the process, I uncovered a lot of dirt … The world trade center was brought down with a Cruise Missile ! U can see it for your self in the Utube Video …
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhtjiYNLQj4
    the world trade center was hit by a cruse missile !

    Then I see the news report, by others, telling us that Obama is a muslem and he admits that is a Muslem, and that is one of them that help bring the world trade center down. and Flight 804, was brought down by a muslem pliot, see these links. – http://beforeitsnews.com/media/2016/06/obama-furious-after-judge-jeanine-calls-him-a-terrorist-on-live-tv-2499219.html and see this film of what is happening to the followers of Christ in the hands of the muslem people. http://shoebat.com/every-five-minutes-a-christian-is-killed-for-the-faith-click-here-to-save-christian-lives/ … and Obama is a muslem … We have been mis lead by our own country leaders, who have lied to us. and its no surprise. All you have to do is just read the tradeing with the enemy act of 1917 and 1933. The american people looked upon as the enemy of the U.S. … its right there in the trading with the enemy act ! … this is why the american people die here and other places. The U.S. do not have to protect the americans if they dont want to … Over all, a writer wrote a statement, concerning the American constitution…. She wrote that day will come, when the Constitution will be refurted and laid aside … George washington was shown in a vision, of three wars that were frougted here in america. In the last veiw, he saw that all the cities of america was broken down and he heard the cries of the people … and he saw a red lantern leading the mob through it all … we can struggle to up hold our rights in law, but when a lawless socity takes over, all rights in law takes flight … in the old king James Bible, there is a verse, in Second Peter, that says: and they shall make merdise of thee … and that true today … the court sells all the judgement and we R held on a bond … its all about money and blood. Our citizen ship is not of this world but above …. Our Lord Jesus will come back to save his people, but of that day and hour, no ones knows … but I assure U, when the ISIS steps foot here in america, does to us, what is now taking place in the mid east, U can be sure, that the hour of Christ return is not far off … how ever, while we can, must lift our voice in protest concerning the lawlessness and correcption in our courts and prisons and jails …. women get locked up and left to delivery the baby on the their own right here in our own american prisons ! men and women died in the hands of cruel correct police officers. I read reports in the Prison Legal News magazen and other places. I have seen first hand, the suffering of prisoners, thrown in violence to the hard cement floors. No wonder, the people R seeking and looking for a soluction to the legal problems … as U say, U R against the new world order … so be it … so Am I … How ever, instead of trying to make Judge Dale look like silly ducy, for all his attempts at trying to deal with the corrupt courts system, why dont U change your tune and tell us how to deal with the legal matters in the proper way and to walk away as a free man and woman ? Can you do it ?

    I got hauled in day and sat in jail for 30 days … I just knew that i was going to prison … and prayed for mercy … 3o days later, the judge called me in to the court and told the officer to leave… and it was just he and me in that big court room … he callled me up to the bench and told me to sit down at the little table on the right side of the bench, and he sat down in the chair that the court clerk usually sits in … and he tells me that he wants me to sign some papers … so that he could asign a court appointed attorney to me … and he told me that he did not want me to tell him nothing … so with qauking hand cuffed hands, I signed the papers, with my name, and addded these words,… all rights reserved, without prejudice … he just sat there, with his hand folded, smiling like a cat ! then they turned me loose…. two weeks later, I showed up in the lawyers office, and he ask me to tell him exactly what happen and then to draw a map … and then he tells me to sign some more papers again, and once more, I wrote, all rights reserved, without prejudice ! …. He looked at what I wrote and he didnt look happy over it … however, he told me that he did not want me to step front into the court room … he said to wait for the second court summon. … so on the second court summon, I waled in and sat down … the court was fulll and I waited for my name to be called … the lawyer was there, and he looked at me only once but didnt say nothing…. about half way throught the court hearing, the court clerk got up and came over to where I was and gave me a folded sheet of paper … welll the message that was written there, about made me jump up and down in joy … “U don’t need to be here, the judge threw it out ! … So what I am saying, be sweet and humble and always lay claim to your rights, no matter what happens … trust me … there is power in those words, when you have a honest judge…. So Snoop4truth, lets hear from U how to deal with law, rather than just spend all your time trying to put out a Fire, “Judge dale” … let him burn,…. Stop wasting your time on him, … its like drinking gasolen and pissing in the camp, … thats a good way to start a forest fire … If he wants to play with fire, let him, but at lest show the water that will put the fire out , rather than point fingers at the one who pissing gasolen in the fire ! (yeah my spelling is bad … )

    Yours truely, Red_October !

    Reply
  34. Chuck Hughes

    I think red is right, snoop has spent so much time and energy try your best to reduce a man who is trying to find his way through the bull, with every case. Where snoop where are the tried and true processes, theories and laws that will walk us through years of lies and layers of deceit from the men and women who swore they would do right by the men and woman of this country. We all need to take in as much information as possible an vase by case rule out the stuff that doesn’t work, and use the stuff that does. Every single theory works if you know how it works. Usually most people using these processes don’t have enough overall first hand working knowledge about what’s really going on to use the process to it’s fullest and effective capacity. Stop putting down rod class have some dignity and tell him, like a man to his face.

    Reply
  35. snoop4truth

    ROD CLASS AND THE “PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL HOAX”

    Rodney DALE Class (“Rod Class”) falsely claims to be a “Private Attorney General” under Title 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and/or The Civil Rights Act Of 1866, BOTH of which are ordinary, FEDERAL, “CIVIL RIGHTS” STATUTES. Class also falsely claims that these two ordinary, FEDERAL, “CIVIL RIGHTS” STATUTES somehow “authorize” him personally to “represent” any party in any court and to otherwise practice law without a license in any court in any jurisdiction (STATE or FEDERAL) in that imaginary capacity. Finally, Class also falsely claims that as a “Private Attorney General”, he is EXTREMELY important, EXTREMELY powerful and EXTREMELY knowledgeable.

    But, contrary to Rod Class’ claims, THE TERM, “PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL” IS NOT A “PROFESSIONAL” OR “OCCUPATIONAL” TITLE (like “Attorney At Law” is or like “Attorney General” is), much less a “professional” or “occupational” TITLE for a non-lawyer who is knowledgeable in amateur/oppostional/defiant legal theories (FAKE laws) who is somehow authorized to represent a party in court and to otherwise practice law without a license in any court in any jurisdiction in that imaginary capacity.

    FACT: THE TERM “PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL” DOES NOT APPEAR IN A SINGLE FEDERAL STATUTE, much less in Title 42 U.S.C. § 1988 or in the Civil Rights Act of 1866. FACT: Congress has NEVER “authorized” or “credentialed” any person to represent a party in court or to otherwise practice law without a license. FACT: Under the tenth amendment of the United States Constitution, Congress HAS NO POWER to “authorize” or to “credential” any person to represent a party in court or to otherwise practice law (only the STATES can do that).

    THE TRUTH: The term, “Private Attorney General” is actually a temporary, JUDICIAL nickname created and used by the FEDERAL COURTS (that expires by the end of the case) for an “ORDINARY CIVIL PLAINTIFF” (who has already WON an ordinary CIVIL case against a statutory violator) and who has NO knowledge of the law, who has NO legal authority, who has NO power and who has NO importance that any other “ORDINARY CIVIL PLAINTIFF” does not already have..

    There are ONLY THREE DIFFERENCES between a generic “Private Attorney General” and ANY OTHER “ORDINARY CIVIL PLAINTIFF”. First, a “Private Attorney General” is a (natural or artificial) person who/which is expressly authorized by the SAME STATUTE VIOLATED (or a statute that refers to the SAME STATUTE VIOLATED) TO BECOME AN “ORDINARY CIVIL PLAINTIFF” and to FILE an ordinary CIVIL suit against the party who/that allegedly violated the statute. Second, a “Private Attorney General” is also statutorily entitled by the SAME STATUTE VIOLATED (or a statute that refers to that SAME STATUTE VIOLATED) to an award of legal fees from the other side IF, AND ONLY IF he/she/it hires a REAL ATTORNEY AT LAW who actually WINS the CIVIL suit that/he/she/it FILED against the alleged statutory violator. Third, a “Private Attorney General” must actually WIN the CIVIL suit that he/she/it FILED against the alleged statutory violator.

    If you will actually read the words that appear in THESE TWO FEDERAL “CIVIL RIGHTS” STATUTES (and the FEDERAL “CIVIL RIGHTS” STATUTES referred to in them), you will discover that THEY ONLY DO TWO THINGS in terms of the “CONCEPT” of a “Private Attorney General”. First, they permit a “VICTIM” (AND ONLY A “VICTIM”) of a statutory violation of the words that actually appear IN THOSE TWO FEDERAL “CIVIL RIGHTS” STATUTES (and to those FEDERAL “CIVIL RIGHTS” STATUTES referred to in them) AND ONLY THOSE STATUTES to become an “ORDINARY CIVIL PLAINTIFF” and to FILE an ordinary CIVIL suit against the alleged statutory violator IN FEDERAL COURT (AND ONLY IN FEDERAL COURT). Second, they permit the FEDERAL judge to award LEGAL FEES to the “ORDINARY CIVIL PLAINTIFF” IF, AND ONLY IF he/she/it actually hired a REAL ATTORNEY AT LAW who actually WINS that CIVIL case. While all federal “civil rights” statute protect civil rights THESE TWO FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS STATUTES DO NOTHING ELSE in terms of the “CONCEPT” of a “Private Attorney General”.

    Indeed, The formal name of Title 42 U.S.C. § 1988 is actually the “CIVIL RIGHTS ATTORNEY’S FEES AWARDS ACT”. This means that the SOLE PURPOSE of that statute is TO PROVIDE PAYMENT to REAL ATTORNEYS AT LAW who actually WIN such CIVIL cases on behalf of “CIVIL RIGHTS” VICTIMS who have suffered a VIOLATION of one or more of the FEDERAL “CIVIL RIGHTS” STATUTES specifically enumerated in that statute.

    Both Title 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and the Civil Rights Act 0f 1866 are “FEE SHIFTING” statutes. This means that they “SHIFT” the WINNING party’s obligation to pay his/her/its OWN LEGAL FEES to the LOSING party. In this way, “CIVIL RIGHTS” “VICTIMS” who have no money, but who have meritorious “CIVIL RIGHTS” cases, are still able to obtain the legal services of a REAL ATTORNEY AT LAW who will likely be paid by the other side at the end of the case.

    Contrary to Rod Class’ claims, there is NOTHING about these TWO FEDERAL “CIVIL RIGHTS” STATUTES that “authorizes” or “credentials” any non-lawyer to “represent” a party in court, to practice law without a license or to use the temporary, JUDICIAL nickname, “Private Attorney General”, as if it were a “professional” or “occupational” TITLE (like “Attorney At Law” or like “Attorney General”).

    A person WHO REALLY IS a “Private Attorney General” under Title 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and/or under The Civil Rights Act Of 1866 IS A “VICTIM” (and only a “victim”) of a violation of those FEDERAL “CIVIL RIGHTS” that are protected and enforced by those two FEDERAL “CIVIL RIGHTS” STATUTES (not other statutes). A person WHO REALLY IS a “Private Attorney General” under Title 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and/or the Civil Rights Act of 1866 IS A “PLAINTIFF” (NOT A “DEFENDANT”). A person WHO REALLY IS a “Private Attorney General” under Title 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and/or the Civil Rights Act of 1866 IS IN “FEDERAL” COURT (NOT IN “STATE” COURT) (State courts have no jurisdiction to hear or decide cases involving alleged violations of FEDERAL “CIVIL RIGHTS” STATUTES.). A person WHO REALLY IS a “Private Attorney General” under Title 42 U.S.C.§ 1988 and/or the Civil Rights Act of 1866 IS A “PARTY” to the litigation (NOT A PERSON WHO PURPORTS TO “REPRESENT” A PARTY to the litigation). Finally, a person WHO REALLY IS a “Private Attorney General” under Title 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and/or the Civil Rights Act of 1866 is an “ordinary civil plaintiff” who has already WON the CIVIL suit that he/she FILED against the alleged statutory violator.

    IQ TEST: So, if you are a “DEFENDANT” in federal court and you are charged with the “CRIME” of “carrying” “weapons” onto United States Capitol grounds, it is LEGALLY IMPOSSIBLE for you to be a “Private Attorney General” under Title 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and/or under The Civil Rights Act of 1866, or any other statute (because you are a “DEFENDANT” in a “CRIMINAL” case and to be a “Private Attorney General” under those TWO FEDERAL “CIVIL RIGHTS” STATUTES, or any other statute, you must be a “PLAINTIFF” who actually FILED and who already WON a FEDERAL“CIVIL RIGHTS” “CIVIL” suit against the alleged statutory violator). So, if you are a defendant in a “STATE” Traffic Ticket case OR a plaintiff in a “STATE” Administrative Court case, then it is LEGALLY IMPOSSIBLE for you to be a “Private Attorney General” under Title 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and/or under The Civil Rights Act of 1866 (because you are in “STATE” court case and to be a “Private Attorney General” under those TWO FEDERAL “CIVIL RIGHTS” STATUTES, you must be IN FEDERAL COURT). So, IF YOU PURPORT TO “REPRESENT” ANY “PARTY” to the litigation IN ANY COURT ANYWHERE, then it is LEGALLY IMPOSSIBLE for you to be a “Private Attorney General” under Title 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and/or under The Civil Rights Act of 1866, or any other statute (because you are PURPORTING TO “REPRESENT” A “PARTY” to the litigation and to be a “Private Attorney General” under these TWO FEDERAL “CIVIL RIGHTS” STATUTES, or any other statute, YOU MUST BE A “PARTY” to the litigation, NOT someone WHO PURPORTS TO “REPRESENT” A “PARTY” to the litigation). So, if you have LOST EVERY SINGLE ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL CASE IN WHICH YOU HAVE EVER BEEN INVOLVED (OVER 70 CONSECUTIVE LOSSES IN A ROW), it is LEGALLY IMPOSSIBLE for you to be a “Private Attorney General” under Title 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and/or the Civil Rights Act of 1866, or any other statute (because you LOST every single case in which you have ever been involved and in order to be a “Private Attorney General” under these TWO FEDERAL “CIVIL RIGHTS” STATUTES, or any other statute, you must have already WON the CIVIL suit that you FILED against the alleged statutory violator).

    Because an “ORDINARY CIVIL PLAINTIFF” cannot represent a party in court or otherwise practice law without a license, and because a “Private Attorney General” IS AN “ORDINARY CIVIL PLAINTIFF”, a “Private Attorney General” cannot represent a party in court or otherwise practice law without a license either. This is because the term, “ORDINARY CIVIL PLAINTIFF,” and the term, “Private Attorney General”, are two different words THAT MEAN THE VERY SAME THING.

    I.Q. TEST: An attorney at law IS an attorney IN EVERY sense of the word. But, a “Private Attorney General” IS NOT an attorney IN ANY sense of the word! An attorney at law represents a party in court. But, a “Private Attorney General” IS A PARTY IN COURT! An attorney at law represents a client in court. But, a “Private Attorney General” IS A CLIENT IN COURT! An attorney at law acts on behalf of people WHO ARE IN COURT. But, a “Private Attorney General” acts on his/her/its own behalf and on behalf of people WHO ARE OUT OF COURT! A person’s status as an attorney at law CONTINUES AFTER THE END OF THE CASE. But, a person’s status of a “Private Attorney General” is temporary and ENDS, AT THE LATEST, AT THE END OF THE CASE! A person CANNOT BE a “Private Attorney General” AFTER THE END OF THE CASE any more than a person can be an “ORDINARY CIVIL PLAINTIFF” AFTER THE END OF THE CASE.

    SOURCE: So, where did this insignificant, temporary, JUDICIAL nickname come from? Well, a REAL governmental “Attorney General” WINS lawsuits against statutory violators which helps to enforce the law thereby benefitting society as a whole. Likewise, an “ORDINARY CIVIL PLAINTIFF” who WINS lawsuits against statutory violators also helps to enforce the law thereby benefitting society as a whole. Noting the similarity IN FUNCTION between a REAL governmental “Attorney General” who WINS such lawsuits and an “ORDINARY CIVIL PLAINTIFF” who WINS such lawsuits, the FEDERAL courts, during that final portion of the case when legal fees might be awarded, began jokingly referring to such “ORDINARY CIVIL PLAINTIFFS” who WIN such lawsuits as “Private Attorneys General”. The FEDERAL courts still use this temporary, JUDICIAL nickname, during that final portion of the case when legal fees might be awarded, to remind the litigants that such an “ORDINARY CIVIL PLAINTIFF” who has already WON such a CIVIL suit against a statutory violator has rendered a public service by helping to enforcing the law and is, therefore, statutorily eligible for an award of legal fees IF, AND ONLY IF that “ORDINARY CIVIL PLAINTIFF” was represented by a REAL ATTORNEY AT LAW in WINNING the case.

    DURATION: The term, “Private Attorney General” ONLY APPLIES to such an “ORDINARY CIVIL PLAINTIFF” from the time of any WIN of such a CIVIL case until the time WHEN ANY LEGAL FEES MIGHT BE AWARDED, or until the end of the case, whichever comes sooner. At that point, the temporary, JUDICIAL nickname, “Private Attorney General” has served its purpose AND EXPIRES FOREVER. So, there is NO SUCH THING as a “Private Attorney General” AFTER THE END OF THE CASE.

    Thus, in creating and using this temporary, JUDICIAL nickname for an “ORDINARY CIVIL PLAINTIFF” (“Private Attorney General”), the FEDERAL COURTS were NOT thereby elevating non-lawyers who were knowledgeable in amateur/oppositional/defiant legal theories (FAKE laws) to the professional level of REAL ATTORNEYS AT LAW or REAL “ATTORNEYS GENERAL”. In so doing, the FEDERAL COURTS were NOT thereby creating a “special class” of FAKE, phony, pretend, make-believe, unlicensed, uneducated, unqualified, self-proclaimed, self-appointed “attorneys” who were somehow “authorized” to represent a party in court or to otherwise practice law without a license in any court in any jurisdiction. In so doing, the FEDERAL COURTS were NOT thereby creating a “professional” or “occupational” TITLE (like “Attorney At Law” or “Attorney General”) for non-lawyers to use in defrauding the public, to use in court, to use on their court documents, to use as the name of their internet radio show, to use plaques hanging on the “back drop” on their video sets, to use on their “costumes”, to use on their vehicles, to use in their seminars or to otherwise use when impersonating a REAL ATTORNEY AT LAW, a REAL ATTORNEY GENERAL or OTHER OFFICIAL AUTHORIZED AND EMPOWERED TO CARRY OUT OR ENFORCE THE LAW.

    But, seeing an opportunity to defraud the American people (again), Rod Class and other amateur/oppositional/defiant legal theorists FRAUDULENTLY CLAIMED that this temporary, JUDICIAL nickname for an “ORDINARY CIVIL PLAINTIFF” (“Private Attorney General”) was a “professional” or “occupational” TITLE (like “Attorney At Law” and “Attorney General”) for a non-lawyer who has knowledge of amateur/oppostional/defiant legal theories (FAKE laws) who is somehow “authorized” to represent a party in court and to otherwise practice law without a license in any court in any jurisdiction. IT IS THIS FAKE DEFINITION OF A “PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL” THAT FORMS THE BASIS FOR THE ENTIRE “PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL HOAX”. Not surprisingly, the courts NEVER adopted this FAKE, DELUSIONAL, NON-SENSE definition for “Private Attorney General”.

    Rod Class and other amateur/oppostional/defiant legal theorists lavished this inapplicable, insignificant, but impressive-sounding , temporary JUDICIAL nickname (“Private Attorney General”) UPON THEMSELVES as if it were a “professional” or “occupational” TITLE (like “Attorney At Law” is and like “Attorney General” is) and use it to create the “ILLUSION” that they are EXTREMELY powerful, EXTREMELY important and EXTREMELY knowledgeable in the law (NONE of which is actually the case).

    CONCLUSION: Rod Class is not now and has never been a “Private Attorney General”. He doesn’t even know the meaning of the term. If you have paid Rod Class for “training” on how to become a “Private Attorney General”, then you are a VICTIM. (It is a federal felony to use a means of interstate commerce, like the internet, to obtain money by marketing seminars under fraudulent pretenses). You may have a right to a refund. If you have paid Rod Class a “retainer”, “legal fees” and/or for his “expenses” for travel, food and lodging in connection with his providing you with “legal services” (in LOSING your case for you), then you are a VICTIM. You may have the right to a refund. Contact Rod Class or the state bar where the offense occurred.

    THE LAW ON THE “PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL”

    CASES THAT DEFINE A “PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL” UNDER TITLE 42 U.S.C. § 1988 AS AN “ORDINARY CIVIL PLAINTIFF” WHO WINS A “CIVIL RIGHTS” CIVIL CASE.

    (Look for BOLD PRINT in each case below.).

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=4612481658703000905&q=+%2242+U.S.C.%22+1988+1983+%22Private+attorney+general%22+%22when+a+plaintiff+succeeds+in+remedying+a+civil+rights+violation%22+%22he+serves+as+a%22+&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8789673379809042125&q=%22Civil+Rights+Attorney%27s+Fees+Awards+Act%22+1988+%22Congress+expressly+recognized+that+a+plaintiff+who+obtains+relief+in+a+Civil+rights+lawsuit+does+so%22+%22as+a+private+attorney+general%22+&hl=en&as_sdt=40006 . There are TWO sections of this case that appear in BOLD PRINT. Be sure to scroll down to the SECOND section of BOLD PRINT for the holding in this case (at about 40% through the text). Look for the term, “PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL”.

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=16098434127441351570&q=counsel+attorneys%27+attorney%27s+fee+fees+%22civil+rights%22+%22when+a+plaintiff%22+%22obtains+an+injunction,+he+does+so%22+%22as+a+Private+attorney+general%22&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12968550988292561231&q=1988+%2242+U.S.C.+1988%22+%22both+fee+award+provisions%22+%22are+intended+to+reward+the+successful+plaintiff+acting+as+a%22+%22private+attorney+general%22&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

    CASES THAT ROD CLASS LOST IN CONNECTION WITH HIS FALSE CLAIMS THAT HE IS A “PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL” WHO IS AUTHORIZED TO “REPRESENT” OTHERS IN COURT AND TO OTHERWISE PRACTICE LAW WITHOUT A LICENSE.

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9078043099739209784&q=+plaintiff+%22does+not+permit%22+%22private+attorney+general%22+%22for+supplemental+representation+by+Mr.%22+%22this+court+denied+the+debtors%27+request%22+%22was+not+an+attorney%22+%22debtors+asked+this+court+to+allow+Mr.%22+Rodney+Dale+Class+&hl=en&as_sdt=40006 . IMPORTANT! Be sure to read footnote 8 (including its FINAL sentence) at the bottom of this case. It is the best (and most concise) summary of the law on the “Private Attorney General” as it relates to amateur/oppositional/defiant legal theory in the entire body of law.

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6091131846651842220&q=%22he+serves+as+a%22+plaintiff+unauthorized+Rodney+Dale+Class++%22in+no+way+does+the+concept+of+a%22+%22private+attorney+general%22+%22permit+an+individual%22+%22not+licensed+to+practice+law%22+%22to+represent+a+party+in+a+court+proceeding%22&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14863743579773715064&q=%22private+attorney+general%22+rodney+dale+class+%22cannot+appear+as+counsel+for+others%22+%22as+a%22+%22lay+person%22+%22he+cannot+prosecute+a+claim+on+behalf+of%22+%22other+individuals%22+&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2757756755752158953&q=%22not+available%22+denied+%22there+is+no+evidence+supporting%22+%22this+allegation%22%22Private+attorney+general%22+Rodney+Class+%22Defendant+claims+he+has+been+given+authority+by+the+house+and+senate+to+act+as+a%22&hl=en&as_sdt=40006 . Scroll down to Ruling 35 in this case. But, be sure to read all of the other “denials” of Rod Class’ motions reflecting his other amateur/oppositonal/defiant legal theories (“capital letters”, etc.). They are priceless. Finally, read footnotes 5-10 at the end of the case. They are excellent.

    CASES LOST BY OTHER FAKE “PRIVATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL”:

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5553195043949924185&q=%22practice+of+law%22+unauthorized+not++%22to+practice+law%22+%22permit+an+individual%22+%22not+licensed%22+%22to+represent+a+party+in+a+court+proceeding%22+%22In+no+way+does+the+concept+of+a%22+%22Private+Attorney+General%22&hl=en&as_sdt=40006 . Note that this case actually cites and quotes the holding in Rod Class’ earlier LOSS on the very same issue in Pertuset I (above) as legal authority for the holding in this case.

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2856702793495571504&q=%22to+appear%22%22as+an+attorney%22+%22for+others%22++authority+permit+%22has+no%22+%22not+authorize%22+%22practice+of+law%22+unauthorized+authorized+%22has+no%22+not+%22attorney+in+fact%22+%22power+of+attorney%22+%22Private+Attorney+General%22+%22Anthony+Williams%22&hl=en&as_sdt=40006 . Note that the FAKE “Private Attorney General” in this case is the same FAKE “Private Attorney General” that is the subject of the three minute video below.

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=3572479853129620278&q=%22for+oneself%22+%22for+others%22+%22of+others%22+authorized+unauthorized+%22practice+of+law%22+lawyer+attorney+attorneys+non+%22Personally+or+by+counsel%22+cannot+not+%22power+of+attorney%22+POA+general+%22Private+attorney%22+%22private+attorney%22&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

    THREE MINUTE VIDEO. MUST SEE!!!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLbXtscZBM8

    NOTE: Note that NONE of the “Private Attorney General” cases shown above have anything to do with “doing accountability” against the state or federal government, their agencies or their personnel.

    NOTE: We would have like to have provided you with links to more cases that Rod Class LOST in connection with his false claims that he is a “Private Attorney General”. But, these cases are only available on Pacer.gov or other websites that will not allow us to link to cases in their databases. Among these other cases that Rod Class LOST on this very issue is Cherylyn Marcos Sellers v. Donald Zsemonadi, et al, Case no. CV 15-05949 SJO (Ex) (C. D. Cal. 2015) (available on Pacer.gov.). Simply key in THE DEFENDANT’S name (last name first) into the Pacer search bar. (For some reason, this case does not appear to come up on Pacer.gov any other way). The court rulings on Rod Class’s false claims that he is a “Private Attorney General” appear on the documents numbered 19 and 11 on the document index of this case. For a classic example of the kind of LOSING papers that Rod Class files in court in his imaginary capacity as a “Private Attorney General”, see document 12 in this case.

    FACT: Rod Class has known about ALL OF THE COURT RULINGS IN ALL OF HIS OWN CASES (shown above) for several years. THESE CASES HAVE ALWAYS DIRECTLY CONTRADICTED ALL OF ROD CLASS’ CLAIMS about what a “Private Attorney General” is, that he was “authorized” and “credentialed” by “Congress” to represent others in court and to otherwise practice law without a license, about what his role was in court in that imaginary capacity and what he allegedly achieved in court in that imaginary capacity.

    QUESTION: HAS ROD CLASS BEEN HONEST WITH YOU ABOUT ALL OF THE RULINGS IN ALL OF HIS OWN CASES (shown above) which have always held that a “Private Attorney General” IS NOT WHAT HE TOLD YOU IT IS? That the “powers” of a “Private Attorney General” ARE NOT WHAT HE TOLD YOU THEY WERE? That HE WAS NEVER “authorized” or “credentialed” by “Congress” to do anything? That HE HAS NEVER BEEN ALLOWED to represent another person in court? That he has LOST each and every single one of the cases (shown above) on the issue of whether he was a “Private Attorney General” who is “authorized” to represent others in court?

    QUESTION: HAS ROD CLASS BEEN HONEST WITH YOU about the true status OF THE LAW on the “Private Attorney General” AS WAS CLEARLY AND REPEATEDLY EXPLAINED, IN GREAT DETAIL, BY ALL OF THE COURTS IN ALL OF HIS OWN CASES, (INCLUDING FOOTNOTE 8 IN PERTUSET I)? (shown above)?

    FACT: Rod Class is so unimportant and so powerless that HE DOES NOT NOW HAVE, AND NEVER HAD, THE LEGAL AUTHORITY TO EVEN SPEAK IN A COURT ROOM AT ALL except as necessary a “PARTY” to the litigation or as necessary as a “FACT WITNESS” if called to the witness stand TO DESCRIBE “FACTS” (“The traffic light was red”). Rod Class is so unimportant and so powerless that HE DOES NOT NOW HAVE, AND NEVER HAD, THE LEGAL AUTHORITY TO EVEN SPEAK IN A COURT ROOM AT ALL IN ANY OTHER CAPACITY, NOT as an “expert witness” AS TO THE LAW, LEGAL CONCLUSIONS OR OPINIONS (“The law says… .”, “So, this means that… .”), NOT as a FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, SECTION 4 “BOUNTY HUNTER” (another Rod Class hoax) in the performance of his imaginary “duties” in that imaginary capacity AND CERTAINLY NOT AS A “PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL” in the performance of his imaginary “duties” in that imaginary capacity. Any words that Rod Class ever speaks in a court room (except as necessary as a “PARTY” and as necessary as a “FACT WITNESS”) are either ILLEGAL, UNAUTHORIZED OR AGAINST THE RULES OF COURT. Any such statements are subject to being STRICKEN from the record, can result in him being forcibly REMOVED and/or BANNED from the courtroom (or court floor) and can result in him being ARRESTED AND CHARGED WITH THE “UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW”. Except for filings in cases for which the applicable statute of limitations has already expired, ROD CLASS IS ACTUALLY SUBJECT TO ARREST AND CONVICTION FOR EACH AND EVERY DOCUMENT THAT HE HAS EVER SIGNED AND FILED IN A COURT FILE ON BEHALF OF ANOTHER PERSON (this is precisely what happened to Anthony Williams as seen in the video above).

    FACT: AS OF TODAY, ROD CLASS (OR CLASS’ SIDE) HAS LOST OVER 70 CONSECUTIVE ADMINISTRATIVE OR JUDICIAL CASES IN A ROW (Class just LOST Carl & Vera Pertuset’s latest foreclosure case, LOST Harold Stanley’s criminal tax evasion case, LOST Harold Stanley’s retaliatory civil suit against the prosecutor and others involved in his criminal tax evasion case, LOST Daryl Zenon Bodan’s traffic case, LOST a retaliatory Administrative Court case that he filed on behalf of Daryl Zenon Bodan in connection with his traffic case). More importantly, Class just LOST HIS OWN APPEAL in his “D.C. Carrying Weapons case” (which may render him INELIGIBLE for a conceal & carry permit and for gun possession in North Carolina). Rod Class has NEVER obtained a single administrative or judicial ruling that governments, government agencies or governmental employees were “private entities” (a plural term), private contractors”, “Corporate Appellees” or for-profit “corporations”, much less “FOUR” of them. That is another Rod Class hoax.

    FACT: THIS MEANS THAT EVERY, SINGLE, FICTIONAL, HALLUCINATORY, SELF-GLORIFYING “WAR STORY” THAT ROD CLASS HAS EVER TOLD YOU ABOUT HIS COUNTLESS VICTORIES IN COURT WAS A “WAR STORY” THAT AROSE OUT OF A CASE THAT HE ACTUALLY LOST (and a case that he had no legal authority to even speak in AT ALL except as necessary as a “PARTY” or as necessary as a “FACT WITNESS” if called to the witness stand)!!!

    ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
    Snoop4truth is a legal expert who opposes the mainstream media and legal disinformation for precisely the same reason, the people behind both disseminate INTENTIONALLY FALSE INFORMATION in order to advance their own agenda at the expense of the American people whom they pretend to serve.

    Had it not been for Rodney DALE Class’(“Rod Class’”) role in manufacturing and perpetuating the “Judge DALE Hoax” and the “Debra Jones Hoax”, Snoop4truth would not have exposed the “Private Attorney General Hoax” here.

    Snoop4truth did not expose the “Private Attorney General Hoax” to harm Rod Class. Instead, Snoop4truth exposed the “Private Attorney General Hoax” SOLELY TO REDUCE THE CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE that such INTENTIONAL FRAUD inflicts upon the American people every single day. Deliberately lying to the American people about their law and their legal system is a willful act of treason and should be treated accordingly.

    NOTE: If Rod Class had simply told you the truth, then he would not be exposed now. The lesson? Just tell the truth and you will never be exposed.

    THREE MINUTE VIDEO. MUST SEE!!!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLbXtscZBM8

    TITLE 42 U.S.C. 1988 (BE SURE TO LOOK FOR § (b))
    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1988

    THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1866 (Pub. Law 88-352 (BE SURE TO LOOK FOR § 204(b))
    https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-78/pdf/STATUTE-78-Pg241.pdf

    PHOTOS of ROD CLASS’ VEHICLE!!!
    http://www.nc4x4.com/forum/threads/douche-bag-attractant.159266/

    More ROD CLASS’’ HOAXES!!!
    https://plus.google.com/114857294023663868625/posts/coN5QFxud7J

    https://plus.google.com/114857294023663868625/posts/BQkDtiiNTH6

    Just tell the truth.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *