~ Forewords ~
I noticed a few weeks ago that my usual AMACO Gas station had Two out of 3 tanks had ethanol in them At first I thought all three had it but the Highest Price Premium apparently was spared. I checked all the service stations Shell etc and it was the same for all. I asked my station owner why this was happening, and I found out that all the distributors for the area were from the Iowa side and he was under contract to supply this product. I had two previous vehicles both 4 cylinders that had to be rebuilt between 40-50,000 miles because I was using 10% ethanol.
When asked I was told that this product burns hotter along with the fact they have to use another liquid to get from the plant to the distribution tanks which by the way were in Iowa. I a News article from our local Television station, It had as a cover story that the Quad Cities would have to find a solution, and within the story was how Iowa politicians were pushing the use of ethanol in the gas. I asked him are we suppose to use Premium Gasoline in our Lawn Mowers and Snow Blowers because we could not use any gas with ethanol in them. Because all the distribution tanks are on the Iowa side, what gives them the right to dictate to Illinois that if we use ethanol the gasoline is cheaper, which is why when the basic 87 gasoline was more expensive. – John M.
March 12, 2013 – A battle between the oil industry and the nation’s corn farmers is brewing in the state Capitol.
In action Tuesday, a Senate panel heard testimony on a proposal backed by corn growers that would remove the sales tax break on gasoline that is mixed with 10 percent ethanol.
Instead of granting incentives to motorists who buy what is commonly known as E10 fuel, the corn growers want to instead apply the tax breaks to gasoline that is 15 percent ethanol.
The shift to E15 would not only potentially boost demand for corn, but it is being promoted as an environmentally friendlier alternative to straight gasoline.
Petroleum marketers, however, are fighting the push.
Representatives of the oil industry, including gas station and pipeline owners, told members of the Senate Agriculture Committee that ending the tax break would not only hurt gasoline retailers, but it could hurt motorists and the environment because E15 may damage engine components and storage tanks.
“It would create leaks out there in our fueling systems,” said Jeff Dzierzanowski, manager of new business development at Source North America Corp.
“I don’t have anybody asking to buy this product,” said Matt Schrimpf, president of Hartford-based HWRT Oil Co.
The Illinois Corn Growers Association, the Illinois Renewable Fuels Association and others say E15 has been extensively tested and has been approved for use by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
State Sen. John Sullivan, D-Rushville, who is sponsoring legislation seeking to end subsidies for E10, said the time is right to begin pushing for E15.
“E10 does not need a tax incentive anymore,” Sullivan said.
State Sen. Kyle McCarter, R-Lebanon, said the legislation could have unintended consequences for petroleum marketers, who would have to spend money to retrofit their stations.
“I know we all want to do good things for the environment, but we may be putting a huge burden on this industry,” he said.
The legislation is Senate Bill 52.
Written by Kurt Erickson for the Quad-City Times, March 12, 2013.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www. law. cornell. edu/uscode/17/107. shtml“>