Dwyer: They Wasted No Tragedy
The tragic events at Sandy Hook Elementary left 28 innocent people dead, their families in pain and grief, and the nation shocked. A derailed maniac, after killing his own mother, took a small arsenal of guns and ammo to a school for a shooting spree. In addition to killing, he hit our national most vulnerable spot as 18 of his 28 victims were children. One can hardly imagine something more tragic and heart breaking. Not that killing adults is somehow less barbarian than killing kids, but when children lose their young lives our sensitivity to human suffering is offended more than with anything else.
There is no life event more traumatic then surviving one’s own child. And no words can bring comfort to the parents of the 18 pupils of Sandy Hook Elementary that were killed on that day. I wish I knew the words that could.
It came as another shock to me, although not quite a surprise, to see how Liberal leading hyenas couldn’t wait a day before politicizing this tragic event of yesterday for their own advantage. But what else could we expect from them? Playing politics each and every time when a disaster or a tragedy strikes is in their heinous Liberal nature, and they really couldn’t help it. It reminded me of a now (in)famous saying of Secretary of Treasury Tim Geitner “never let a disaster go to waste”. And so they don’t.
I won’t get into details of Liberal attacks – the so-called “mainstream” media are full of them. I am sick of this enough, even without analyzing the flawed logic of these attacks in writing. As it usually is with Liberals and their never ending fallacies, the conclusions they try to draw for their own political gain are false. But the Liberal attackers are not just wrong, they are dangerously wrong.
They leave me with no choice but to reciprocate with their combative tactics.
For many years now, they have launched assaults on America as we know her, and recently, they are in a state of frontal assault on the very foundation of our freedom and prosperity. For them, the American freedom never worked, as President Obama put it while referring to American capitalism, so they are vigorously pushing to replace it with something else. Their absurd ideas of “social justice,” by which they meant rewarding the failures with the proceeds of punitive taxation of success, have already created a large privileged class of able-body working-age social parasites, augmented by a growing army of non-wealth-producing but handsomely paid government employees, while the wealth-creating companies are leaving in droves America for Brazil, China, India, and other developing countries, taking their manufacturing facilities with them. As a result, foreign nations gain economic and political strength while our country drowns further and further in recession, private-sector unemployment, and national debt, complements to the Liberal regulators who in their arrogant stupidity could not have predicted these sorry consequences of their “intelligent” re-design of the American society and economy.
Now, they are orchestrating a frontal attack on our most basic freedom: the right to defend ourselves and our loved ones with a deadly weapon. And they use the yesterday’s tragedy as an excuse to chip away another liberty of the law-abiding Americans.
To be fair to their agenda, there are some benefits of delegalization of privately-owned firearms. The most conspicuous of which is an anticipated ease with which incomes of hard-working but armless Americans can be redistributed among the privileged class of those “entitlees” who can work hard but won’t. Just think of it. How can the Liberal elites implement the social leveling that they seem to profess when almost half of American households have one or more firearms? The fact is that they cannot, so it does not surprise me to see their frantic efforts to separate productive Americans (the so-called “haves”) from their effective means of self-defense.
But there is nothing for us in the “gun control” deceptive game. Although millions of our fellow Americans who have delegated thinking to their Liberal-dominated government believe that they will be safer after they delegate to the government their right to self-defense, too, the tragedy at Sandy Hook Elementary can give an intelligent bystander a glimpse into what the government monopoly on protecting lives of its subjects may look like.
A 20-years young inexperienced maniac apparently had no trouble with breaking into this secure “gun-free” zone as vast majority of Liberal-run public school are. Seemingly not impressed with the federal law that prohibited him from bringing guns on the school ground, he went on his shooting spree without having to face any armed resistance from his victims or those who were supposed to protect them.
It was only after the slaughter of the innocent took place when the heavily armed police, FBI, and ATF forces entered the crime scene, engaging in a spectacular grand tour of force that lasted long after the shooter killed himself as if it could prevent the killings that already took place or save others from the bullets from guns of the already dead shooter. As if this typically bureaucratic yet prohibitively costly remedy were not enough, armed officers were dispatched to the homes of the families whose children were involved in the shooting. To make them feel even safer under the government protection, I suppose.
The only helpful measure that the government undertook was retrieving the wounded and the dead from the scene and sending counselors to the affected families in order to help them coping with their traumatic experiences. And this seems like the most certain remedies that one can expect when one delegates to government one’s right to self defense.
Under these circumstances of government’s incompetence to actually protect those in real danger, the least we question we can ask here is this. If guns are so evil, as the attacking Liberal hyenas suggest, then why all the governmental agents, whose parade we saw on the crime scene in the aftermath of the shooting, offered us such a blatantly arrogant display of all kinds of deadly weapons they ostentatiously wore, from sniper rifles to military semi-autos to high-capacity assault rifles, although there was no credible threat to public safety after the shooter killed himself?
Somehow, evil weapons of mass destruction in the hands of government agents miraculously become the good guns. Or so the Liberal deniers of our God-given right to self-defense claim.
This is utterly absurd, folks, and quite dangerously so.
The only rational ban I see that may be seriously considered as a preventive measure after the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary is to ban all Liberal-controlled public schools, as they are the places of choice for derailed maniacs who want to kill a bigger number of victims unobstructedly. But the Liberal hyenas will not let that happen for the indoctrination of the youth with Liberal propaganda may be at stake. They will not rest until they liberate us from all our liberties so that we can become the making workforce of goods for the needs of all those taking who refuse to live of the fruits of their own work, and for subsistence of the huge government bureaucracy that is being created to supervised that arrangement.
December 16, 2012
~ The Author ~
Mr. Dwyer has been a continuing contributor to the Federal Observer. Mark Andrew Dwyer’s commentaries (updated frequently) can be found here. Send your comments to readerswrite@yahoo.com.
[...] FURTHER READINGS They wasted no tragedy [...]
“Never waste a good crisis.”
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, Obama Administration
“Never allow a crisis to go to waste. They are opportunities to do big things.”
Rahm Emanuel, Chief of Staff, Obama Administration
“There is great opportunity in the midst of the great crisis befalling America.”
President Barack Obama
Of course you can’t waste a tragedy you created.
That’s the purpose of it.
This poor kid had nothing to do with this just the patsy. Once again in America we have a “Lone Gunman” I mean please folks pay attention do you not see a pattern?? Can anyone think anymore? eye witness’s teachers from that school reported seeing 2 men in black attire running from the scene.
(this doesn’t fit the story line so you will not hear anything about it) the real shooters who also killed the patsy to have him blamed.
The guy had 2 pistols which only hold 10 rounds max and were 9 Mil
the children were riddled with 223 ammo so please someone explain how he got off so many rounds when he would have had to reload several times and how did he get the 9 Mil pistols to fire 223 rifle ammo.
Sorry one guy with 2 pistols cannot get off that many rounds that fast and have it be ammo that those pistols cannot shoot. (i know i have those very pistols)
Colorado there was not enough carnage and the Portland operation was a complete bust so they had to have some serious carnage to make sure it got the public’s total attention and what better than a ritual child
killing bloodbath (which is how they finally got the guns in Australia)
to get the ball really rolling.
The so called lone gunman was just as innocent as the rest of the victims
so while your praying for them send one to your god of choice for him as well because he didn’t do it.
…and a big AMEN to you MOTO…I do believe you have hit the nail on head. I have read every one of these articles posted in the FO today, and nary a one that discusses this mass murder has touched this point. They all seem to follow the lie that it was this kiddo to begin with. What about the similarities twixt this shooting and Aurora, with the map of Sandy Hook being shown in that Batman movie too, and what about two men the police were chasing away from the scene, and the witnesses talking about a second shooter—and the missing shooters in each case from Columbine to date…Throw in the connection to the Libor scandal and it starts to become a bit clearer, but all that “news” now being suppressed and erased by the Gov and the MSM. One thing these guys all seem to agree on is the gov will “USE” the event to suit their purposes. Why is it so difficult to conceive then that this same bunch of criminals that are killing children around the globe almost daily, would not kill children in this country also if they could get away with it? It doesn’t take a mental giant to see this, but it does take folks that are too scared for their own lives to say something about it. I do believe ol’ Jeff omits certain things like this sometimes just to see if any of us are actually thinking and paying attention. And MOTO, you get a thanks, and a salute from me.
Thanks Osh Ha! I usually get called all sorts of names when i post something here folks just don’t like my views they much more prefer the
rose colored glasses view.
And to those sucked in by the media extravaganza on this mind control operation (here’s what is really going on there:
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/rappoportnewtownmindcontrol18dec12.shtml)
Also here are a few discrepancies in this story you should be looking at if you believe a deranged kid did this highly organized attack.
1) As yet, we have not seen any concrete evidence that any child died.
2) As yet, parents have not been allowed to see their children. (Photoshopped pictures do not count.)
3) As of now, I have seen only one unambiguous statement from a grieving parent (Robbie Parker).
4) According to the official story, Adam Lanza was found with his older brother’s ID, and it was not stolen. However, older brother Ryan–who officials say is very cooperative–claims not to have even seen his brother since 2010. Where would Adam get this ID? And why does such use not qualify as a theft?
5) According to the official story, Adam Lanza was wearing a black outfit with a mask and bulletproof vest. Why would he want to hide his identity, and why would he wear a bulletproof vest, if he planned to kill himself?
6) The medical examiner asserts that all wounds were caused by a rifle or other long weapon, and police/FBI say that the school was littered with .223 (rifle) casings. But Adam Lanza was found dead in the school with only handguns–a rifle was found in the trunk of his car. But then he could not possibly have been firing the rifle, and could not have committed the murders. Who did?
7) According to the official story, the killing was tightly confined to two classrooms. But then why were so many children told to close their eyes while leaving the building?
8 ) Joanne Didonato, the principal’s secretary, called in sick on Friday–something she rarely does. So presumably, she must have been awfully ill. Yet she then felt well enough to give an interview. “Of all days,” she said, emphasizing the strange coincidence.
9) The hospital went into lockdown and cleared four trauma rooms, but received only three patients, two of them dead children(according to the official story) and one mildly wounded adult.
10) Why were there such persistent reports that Mrs. Lanza was a kindergarten teacher, and that she died at the school, when the new official story is that she was not connected to the school and was killed at home?
11) What happened to the report that Adam Lanza’s girlfriend and another friend were missing in New Jersey?
12) What happened to the woodsman in a black jacket and camo pants who was arrested and handcuffed outside the school? He actually shouted to parents, “It wasn’t me.” Who was he and what was he doing there?
13) What happened to the dark van or SUV that the police surrounded in the parking lot, or the maroon sedan with a blown-out back window they were on the lookout for?
14) The official story is that Nancy Lanza was a gun collector who obeyed the law. But since 20-year-olds are not permitted to buy guns or ammo or carry guns in Connecticut, why would she give her “autistic” son access to both guns and ammo?
15) Why were parents told on Friday that “if you haven’t been reunited with your child by now it’s already over”? Does anyone imagine that real parents of real children would simply say, “Okay, the show’s over, let’s go home now”?
16) Would real parents of real children really be satisfied with (possibly photoshopped) pictures of their children? Wouldn’t they demand to see their children one last time firsthand?
17) According to the official story, 28 people died but only 1 was wounded. The dead included 20 small, squirmy children–difficult targets even for professionals. How could Adam Lanza achieve such amazingly deadly accuracy, in such a short length of time?
18 ) A child asserts that he/she heard someone say, “Put your hands up,” followed by the reply, “Don’t shoot.” This indicates that the police took a suspect into custody inside the school. But if that was Adam Lanza, how did he kill himself after that point?
19) Another child asserts that he/she saw a man pinned down to the ground with handcuffs on. Again, this indicates that the police took a suspect into custody. If that was Adam Lanza, how did he then kill himself?
20) When Ryan Lanza was falsely identified as the shooter, who deleted his Facebook profile and created many others in his name?
21) Is it reasonable for a geeky 20-year-old to carry two pistols and hundreds of rounds of ammunition while wearing a bulletproof vest and a mask?
22) Why did the police say on Friday that they were going to leave the bodies rotting in the school until Sunday, then Saturday morning announce that they had spirited the bodies away in the middle of the night? Perhaps to ensure that the transport, if any, would go unrecorded on photos or video?
23) Why won’t police tell us where they found the Henry repeating rifle, the Enfield rifle, and the shotgun?
24) Did the school have one or more security cameras? What do they show?
25) Why did a police officer specifically mention, on radio, that “they’re coming at me through this wood,” followed by a fellow officer saying, “This is it”?
26) One officer in the school said, “We’ve got one suspect down.” Who was that? Down in this situation generally means in custody (on the ground and cuffed), not dead.
27) Why didn’t Adam’s uncle see anything out of the ordinary in Adam when the two saw each other in June?
28 ) Why is Adam Lanza reported to be a loner when a teenager said oxymoronically), “[Lanza and his friends] always gathered alone in a corner in school”?
29) Why did police assign an individual state trooper to every grieving family, whether the family wants such “protection” or not?
30) Why are Ryan Lanza and his roommates still in custody, and why are the police pretending that it’s for their own benefit?
31) Is it a coincidence that Nancy Lanza’s brother is Kingston Police Officer James Champion, who lives next door to the former Lanza home?
32) Since the alleged shooter’s father is VP of GE Capital, and (like “Batman shooter” James Holmes’s father) was scheduled to testify at the Senate Hearings on the LIBOR scandal, is there a LIBOR connection to this event?”
I hope that this incident is closely monitored. There is more that what meets the eyes and ears here. I do not believe this boy acted alone. Someone coached him, for the simple reason of his inability to focus. If you know about Asperger syndrome then you know he had to be focused for awhile he didn’t do this on his own.
Thank you, Mr. Dwyer.