The 9-11 Black Attack on Democrats
Seattle – Suing President Barack Obama and the Democratic Party for racism would be a joke if the Plaintiffs were anyone other than Rev. Wayne Perryman, a respected black minister and community activist. Perryman, an author, lecturer and a former newspaper publisher and radio talk show host who has received a multitude of honors and awards for his work and community service, was recently recognized by Chairman Benjamin Jealous of the NAACP for his latest research on racism and politics.
On September 11, 2011, Perryman brought together blacks from the West Coast and the East Coast to sign one of the most comprehensive legal briefs ever prepared for a racial discrimination lawsuit. The suit was to filed on September 12, 2011 in US District Court against President Barack Obama and the DNC. The plaintiffs, who refer to the defendants as the “Father of Racism,” allege that as an organization, the Democratic Party has consistently refused to apologize for the role they played in slavery, Jim Crow and for other subsequent racist practices from 1792 to 2011. Mrs. Frances P. Rice, the Chair of the National Black Republican Association is also a named plaintiff in the class action lawsuit.
The case (No. C11-1503), cites the collective work of over 350 legal scholars and includes Congressional records, case law, research from our nation’s top history professors, racist statements from Democratic elected officials, citations from the Democrat’s National Platforms regarding their support of slavery, excepts of speeches from Senator Obama, individual testimonies from blacks who lived in the Jim Crow South and opinions from the NAACP.
Perryman said President Obama was named as a defendant not only because he is the official leader of the Democratic Party, but because of certain statements he made about his own party in his book, Dreams from My Father. In 2009, the President was asked to issue an apology to blacks on behalf of his party, but he refused. Unlike other reparations lawsuits, this lawsuit merely asks for a public apology, but no monetary damages.
In the 40-page brief, Rev. Perryman tells the court that the Democratic Party, (the party that is quick to call the Tea Party and Republicans racist), is the same party that refuses to confess and/or acknowledge (in public and on their website) that they are the party that supported the institution that packed millions of black men, women and children in the deep dark hulls of slave ships with just barely enough food and water to keep them alive, and forced them to lie in their own urine, feces, and vomit for the duration of a long trip across the Atlantic. And after arriving in America, it was the members of their party that forced these poor souls to work from sunup to sundown for the next 70 years and never paid them one dime. And when the black victims were fortunate enough to escape, it was the Democratic Party that passed Fugitive Slave laws to return them to their brutal slave masters.
When their inhumane institution of slavery was challenged by the opposing party, Democrats countered by placing threats in their political platforms (1844-1856), – threatening anyone who dared to interfere with what they called, “the sectional issue of DomesticSlavery.” On May 21, 1856, they carried out their threats when they attacked their opposition, Senator Charles Sumner with a walking cane on the Senate floor and when they attacked with guns, freed blacks and abolitionists on the streets of Lawrence, Kansas. Six years later, Democrats called themselves ‘Confederates” and went to war killing thousands to defend and protect their racist institution of slavery. After losing the war, they fought against constitutional amendments and civil rights legislation for blacks, and chose instead to form terrorist organizations, legislate Black Codes and Jim Crow Laws and support every landmark case that was designed to deny blacks their constitutional rights including the Slaughterhouse Case, Plessy v Ferguson, the Civil Rights Cases of 1881 to overturn the 1875 Civil Rights Act, and Brown v. the Board of Education. While many of these cases were pending, Democrats proudly adopted the name “The Party of White Supremacy” and committed every inhumane violent act known to mankind (from 1867 to 1977) to keep blacks in “their place.” And to add insult to injury, after killing millions of blacks through their racist institutions, they hired powerful attorneys to keep this information from blacks and to avoid apologizing to blacks.
Perryman said, “Any organization that has such a racist history and receives 97% of the African American vote (after doing all they could to deny blacks the right to vote), should willingly apologize without being forced do so through a lawsuit. He said, “I guess they feel they have nothing to apologize for.” Perryman went on to say that he is “convinced that Democrats will only apologize if the media, or the courts (with public pressure) will force them to do so. The man who authored the book: The Audacity of Hope, now has the “audacity” to refuse to apologize for his political party and their racist institutions, that took the lives of millions of his own people.
Apologies for Racism – Precedent Set
In the 40-page brief covering a period from 1792 to 2011, Perryman makes the following claims regarding past apologies for racism and racial injustices. Perryman said history reveals that an apology or reparation for blacks would not be an issue today had the Democratic President Andrew Johnson chosen to sign Senate Bill 60. Since Johnson’s veto of Senate Bill 60, the door for reparations involving racial injustices remained closed for over 120 years. In 1988, Congress opened that door with the passage of the Civil Liberties Act of 1988. Under that new bill, Japanese internment victims received an apology plus $20,000 each in reparation pay. In 1993, the victims of the Rosewood, Florida Massacre received an apology and reparations from the State of Florida. On May 16, 1997, President Clinton issued an apology to the victims of the Tuskegee Experiment and paid the African American victims a total of $10,000,000 in reparations. On February 7, 2005, the 109th Congress issued Senate Resolution 39 and apologized for not enacting lynching laws to protect those who were victims of lynching. In that resolution, Congress stopped short of acknowledging that all of the lynchings took place in regions controlled by Democrats. And finally on January 20, 2007, the Executive Committee of the Democratic Party of North Carolina apologized for the 1898 riot and massacre that killed several black Republicans and drove them out of office.
Rev. Perryman’s thoughts…
When asked what he thought the public reaction will be to the lawsuit, Perryman
said, those who sincerely oppose racism will fully support this case and it matters not whether they are members of the Democratic Party, the Republican Party, the Tea Party or members of the News Media. But those who are unaware of the historic facts contained in this brief will ignore it and call it “frivolous.” That’s why we are sending out thousands of copies of the brief via U.S. mail, internet and Facebook so the general public will have all the facts before deciding to ignore or support. For PDF copy of the 40-page brief they can e-mail us at Doublebro@aol.com [mailto:Doublebro@aol.com].
Who is Rev. Perryman?
Rev. Perryman is the same Seattle minister who used his biblical research in 1994 to persuade the world’s two largest Christian publishers (Zondervans and Thomas Nelson) and the Encyclopedia Britannica to apologize and remove the “Curse of Ham” theory from all of their publications. The curse theory had existed for over 500 years and was used by Southern Christians and Democrats to justify slavery and their mistreatment of African Americans.
P.O. Box 256
Mercer Island, WA 98040
Obama’s References to His Party’s Racist Past
President Barack Obama is one of the only black elected officials and one of the
only black leaders in modern-day history – who has openly discussed how badly Democrats have treated black voters and he does so in his book: Dreams From My Father. The book highlights a conversation where black Democrats referred to their relationship with the Democratic Party as “Plantation Politics.” (p. 147). Obama reports that during this conversation blacks in the barber shop asked themselves, why do they keep voting Democrat when blacks have “the worst jobs, the worst housing, Police brutality rampant, … and we all line up and vote the straight Democratic ticket.
Sell our soul for a Christmas Turkey. White folks spitting in our faces and we’d
reward them with the vote.”
Obama also states in his book that some white Democrats said they would “vote Republican before voting for a black [Democrat] to be mayor” of Chicago. (p. 148)
During Obama’s Victory Speech on November 5, 2008 he talked about Ann Nixon Cooper, a black woman who could not vote because of his party’s voting policies in the South and during that same speech he referred to “the buses in Montgomery, the hoses in Birmingham, the bridge in Selma and the preacher from Atlanta,” – all racist situations that occurred in areas where Democrat elected officials were in control.
He also talked about his party’s racist past during his March 18, 2008 speech regarding Rev. Wright. The then Senator Obama said, “…so many of the disparities that exist in the African American community today can be traced directly to the inequalities passed on from an earlier generation that suffered under the [Democrat’s] brutal legacy of slavery and Jim Crow.”
Obama, a student of history knew that his party made the following statements in several of their national platforms:
DEMOCRATS’ 1844 PLATFORM for SLAVERY
“All efforts by the abolitionist and others made to induce Congress to interfere with questions of slavery… are calculated to lead to the most alarming and dangerous consequences….”
DEMOCRATS’ 1852 PLATFORM for SLAVERY
“The Democratic Party standing on this national platform will abide by and adhere to a faithful execution of the acts [meaning Fugitive Slave Laws]… for reclaiming fugitives…. The Democratic Party will resist all attempts at renewing in Congress or out of it, the agitation of the slavery question, under whatever shape or color the attempt is made.”
Not one Democrat voted for the 13th Amendment to end slavery and as a party, Democrats did not vote to pass the 14th Amendment to make blacks citizens nor did they support the 15th Amendment to give blacks the right to vote.
Obama is one of the only black leaders who have acknowledged these wrongs by his party. So with this lawsuit we are simply asking: based on what he knows about his party’s racist past and how they have treated black folks, why is he and the leaders of his party reluctant to issue a public apology?
Rev. Wayne Perryman
Response to the Lawsuit has been great
The response to this lawsuit has been great. One person had over 7,000 on his e-mail list and my other friend has over 20,000 on his e-mail list. Up to this point, we probably have reached over 100,000 people. Newsmax asked for copy of the brief, and Pat Boone has asked me to come to Beverly Hills this weekend to speak at their Tea Party. I spoke there last year, and they told Pat Boone that he had to bring me back. Pat wants me to talk about our lawsuit and he said there will be more press there this year. Last year I met Andrew Brietbart in Beverly and he videoed the speech and put it on his website and asked me to be on his show. Both my video and my interview with him is on his website.
The Drudge Report is also looking at the lawsuit and it is on several black websites already. So things are going better than we expected. So far the mainstream media has ignored it. But when we finish with this case, they will never call Tea Party people racist again, nor will Maxine Waters tell them to go to hell.
I am now sending everyone a PDF copy of the legal brief. If people will start writing the court and just simply say that as citizens of the United States they strongly support this case, it can make all the difference in the world. So I hope different groups will start a letter writing campaign. After this lawsuit everyone will know the real history of the Democratic Party and they will ask: If they don’t want to issue an apology they must be proud of what they did to blacks.
So Connie, thank your for sending the Press Release to Rush, Hannity and Palin.
People are praying for this case all over America.
Rev. Wayne Perryman
More from Rev. Perryman…
According to movie star and singer, Pat Boone, Rev. Wayne Perryman, will be one of the featured speakers at Pat’s Beverly Hill Tea Party on Sunday September 18th. Pat said members of his Tea Party committee overwhelmingly ask that he bring Perryman back this year after his inspirational speech last year. Andrew Brietbart was in the audience and immediately asked Rev. Perryman to be a guest on his show. Perryman’s speech and interview are featured on Brietbart’s website.
Rev. Perryman who is the lead Plaintiff in the class-action lawsuit against President Obama and the Democratic Party (for their past racist practices), will focus his speech around Maxine Waters’ demand that the Tea Party “Go to Hell”. Perryman has been a featured speaker at many other Tea Party events around the country including the large Tea Party rally in Phoenix, Arizona after the passage of their controversial immigration law.
Pat Boone said this year’s event will have much larger crowds and more media coverage than the previous year. Perryman’s book: “the Drama of Obama Regarding Racism,’ will be available after the speech.
For those interested we have attached a PDF copy of the legal brief filed by Perryman on September 12, 2011.
Visit Dr. Perry’s website at: http://www.wayneperryman.com/
WA State Coordinator
Tea Party Patriots
FAIR USE NOTICE:This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: