Hawaiian birth certificate(s)
You gotta respect Donald Trump or at least thank him for doing what no one else has and bring this to a head. Finally, someone in the mainstream is saying the things that need to be said about Obama’s fake nativity story. To clear up a lot of confusion, [within] is an image of EXACTLY the document that Obama needs to produce.
[Within this article] is the birth certificate of Susan Nordyke, one of a set of twins who were born at the Kapiolani Hospital in Honolulu on August 5, 1961. Obama CLAIMS to have been born on August 6th. Therefore, this certificate form is EXACTLY THE SAME as what would have been generated for Obama.
Hawaiian Birth Certificate posted by Ann Barnhardt - March 31, 2011
This form gives the name, age, address, race and description of the occupation of the father. It does NOT give the religion. It gives the name, age, address, race, occupation outside of the home and last date worked of the mother.
Interestingly, IT DOES NOT LIST THE RACE OF THE CHILD. Look for yourself. There is no field at the top for race of the baby.
So, given this, there are several things we can logically conclude:
1. The word “Muslim” does not appear on Obama’s BC assuming he was in fact born in Honolulu in August of 1961, because these certificates make no mention of religion at all. So that can’t be the big secret.
2. Obama himself cannot be listed as either “Caucasian” or “Arab” because there is no field on the certificate for the race of the child. So that can’t be the big secret, either, assuming Obama even has a Hawaii BC.
3. I doubt that the father’s field would say either “Frank Marshall Davis” or “Unknown” because the baby was named “Barack Hussein Obama, Jr.”. If you’re going to go to the lengths of naming a baby “Jr.”, then there is no reason not to list “Sr.” as the daddy – even if that is a lie. If you name the kid “Jr.”, you’re in for a penny, in for a pound. Again, this assumes Barry actually has a Hawaii BC.
So where does this leave us?
A. There is no Hawaii birth certificate because he wasn’t born in Hawaii. Ann Dunham was present and enrolled at the University of Washington TWO WEEKS after Obama’s alleged birth date. He could have been born just across the border in Canada, and then Granny Dunham registered his birth with the state of Hawaii, thus automatically generating the newspaper announcement. This would have been done to fraudulently obtain citizenship for Barry.
B. He could have been born months earlier. Given that Ann picked up, flew across the Pacific, enrolled and began attending classes at the University of Washington all before August 20, 1961, it seems a bit much to think that she did all this at the age of 18 with a tiny newborn baby.
C. Obama could have indeed been born in Kenya, and Granny Dunham submitted a false certificate of home birth to get him US citizenship, again, thus automatically generating the newspaper birth announcement.
D. When Obama was adopted by Lolo Soetoro in Indonesia, his original BC was altered to reflect the new name “Barry Soetoro” with Lolo listed as the father.
If this is the case, Obama MUST be a dual citizen of Indonesia, because Indonesia required citizenship of adopted children. Also, unless Obama legally had his named changed back to “Barack Obama”, his name today legally remains “Barry Soetoro”. This would nullify every document he has signed. If you don’t believe me, try signing this year’s tax return with the name “Peaches McAwesome” and see if you don’t get a visit from the IRS.
Finally, and I think this is the monster issue, unless Barry formally rescinded his Indonesian citizenship upon reaching the age of majority, he is AT BEST a dual citizen of the US and Indonesia. If he presented himself as an Indonesian citizen after the age of 18 either to acquire college scholarships OR traveling under an Indonesian passport after the age of 18, then there is no way in God’s Green Earth that he can be the President of the United States.
No person who has EVER, under any circumstance, claimed citizenship to any country other than the United States as an adult be eligible for the Presidency. That’s just common sense. The LEGAL standard per the Constitution is far, far more stringent than that. I realize that. I’m just talking about common sense. This is a no-brainer. Obama is a completely illegal usurper, a con artist, a liar, and he MUST be removed, not by impeachment, but by law enforcement. Impeachment only applies to legitimate sitting Presidents. Obama is neither legitimate, nor the President. He is a hostile invader and the enemy of this nation, its people and its Constitution. Barack and Michelle Obama SHOULD spend the rest of their lives being supported and secured by the tax dollars of the people of the United States of America . . . in lovely Florence, Colorado.
Source: Barnhardt Capital Management, Inc., March 31, 2011.
FAIR USE NOTICE:This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
I have found it interesting that of all the obvious discrepancies on the posted forgery, the most glaring has never been mentioned. We’ve had analyses on everything from the spacing on the registration numbers to the inconsistencies in the background, but the one problem with the fabricated, manufactured document that was “released” is in the race of the father. It says “African”. Now, I hate to be picky, but there was a time in this country when people actually stated things the way they were, without what we know of as “political correctness”. In 1961, the race of a black person was known as, and referred to as, Negro, in accordance with the Negroid race. Even Martin Luther King, who was a real man, referred to his own race and members thereof as Negroes. It wasn’t until sometime in the late 80s or early 90s that the world became afraid of using that word. African, no matter how you cut it, is not a “race”. If anything, it’s a nationality. In actuality, it’s what might even be called a “continentality” (I made that word up). If “African” is a race, that would mean that all the people who live in South Africa are “Africans”, and many or most of those people are white, or “caucasian”.
In 1961, there was not the degree of fear that there is today, nor was there this hyper-sensitivity and worry about “offending” people with the proper and correct terms applicable to them.
Most of us[who have a lick of common sense]know this to be a given. As a matter of fact, I’m listening to an African on the Radio right now. His name is Robby Noel, and yes, hes a white guy.
I agree with Excalibur.
In 1961, people of African ancestry were referred to as “negro” or “colored”.
The term “black” did not come into general use until AFTER the Civil Rights movement of the mid-1960s and AFTER the Black Power movement of the the late 1960s…around 1970.
The term “African-American” did not come into general usage until 1990.
The politically-correct trust-fund babies who put these phony birth certificates together are not only politically correct but totally ignorant of office procedures used in 1961. Forms were filled out either by hand (if the person had good, legible handwriting) or filled in carefully with a typewriter. Laser printers, starting with the HP Laser Jet, became available in 1989 and were not in common use until 1994.
When the first phony birth certificate (certificate of live birth) came out in August 2008, there were articles on CNN and elsewhere about the efforts of the production staff on the TV show “Mad Men” about their attention to detail in clothing, furniture and even booze bottles to ensure accuracy in depicting the environment of 1963 in the Madison Avenue advertising area in New York’s Manhattan. The people who made these phony birth certificates didn’t put in one-tenth of the effort of the “Mad Men” production staff to make them authentic-looking.
A pox upon the house of Obama and his lazy followers!
AHH! HOPE AND CHANGE, HOPE AND CHANGE!!!!!!
Great read. The only thing I think was overlooked is the fact that EVERYONE involved with fronting the first Kenyan, from those actively knowing that he is ineligible to those who have the power to investigate barry and the first Klingon but choose to passively accept him at face value for whatever reason, to those that provide political cover and mass media excuses need to be prosecuted for TREASON. Because that what it is.
There is the entirety of the demo-rat party, half the “republican” party, 98% of the media and every public sector union official in the country.
The if, not when of finding out this criminality WILL kick off a civil war. Maybe that is why the powers that be say nothing and are balls out building the police state as fast as possible.
It’s really funny that, No one in Hawaii’s DOH will verify that the rag The O-Bozo Administration cobbed together is in all reality legit. I repeat….No One!