How “no racial profiling” idiocy makes us dumber than we are

Imagine a detective who tries to catch a serial rapist. He first compiles a suspects list on which he puts both men and women. In his commitment to avoid gender profiling, he makes sure that for every male he suspects of a rape there is a female suspect on his list, too. What a fool, you might think, and you’d be right. It’s the same kind of idiocy as when an airport security agent pulls out of a waiting line a white grandma for a “random” anti-terrorist screening (“racial profiling” is strictly prohibited to the agents).

One of the fundamental characteristics of intelligence is one’s ability to notice patterns and trends (“connect the dots”, as some say). Most IQ tests contain questions of the form “Which of the following five items is out of place here?”. In simple situation, like, for instance, an IQ test, the samples are small (say, no more than five items), and the patterns or trends are clear, at least for those intelligent enough to see them. In real life, though, the situation tends to be more complex as samples are huge, the patterns and trends are less than clear, and often there is only a statistical correlation between the appearances and what they signify so that it takes a more sophisticated kind of smart to notice it. Unfortunately, many our ruling elites definitely do not want us to be that smart.

Here are few examples.
Statistically, it is more likely that millions migrants from Mexico will have a stronger tendency to replicate their failed society and primitive culture in the U.S. than to assimilate and become good citizens supportive of American tradition, socio-economic system, laws, and culture.

Statistically, it is more likely that millions of the descendants of these migrants will remain loyal (or become loyal when called upon by Chicano revolutionaries and Mexican irredentist nationalists) to their country of origin and their “La Raza” than to the U.S. and its people, particularly when there is a conflict of interest between ours and theirs, which has been the case for decades now.

Statistically, it is more likely that millions of the descendants of Mexican mestizos will develop strong racial and ethnic identity, bordering with self-centered chauvinism (particularly, when indoctrinated in American public education system, see [1]), together with up front assertion of entitlement based on racial/ethnic group membership, than become specimens of color-blindness and inter-racial altruism as postulated by the post-modern post-racialism.

Statistically, it is more likely that millions of legalized migrants from Mexico will become feet in the doorstep for many more millions to hop the border and claim “their” share of America than defenders of Western culture and civilization against the invasive ones.

Statistically, it is more likely than not that whatever areas of the U.S. they colonize and populate will be characterized by high rates of corruption, crime, and violence that are similar to those recorded in the countries that they and their ancestors came from.

One must be a fool with substandard IQ to not notice these statistical correlations, or to expect that millions of Mexican mestizo migrants will defy these statistics and become, by and large, as good Americans as the rest of us are, loyal to this country, its people, and its mainstream culture, willing to obey our laws and respect the rights of others, even when not watched, and to defend and preserve America as is. (There is no credible evidence that more than a few will.)

For those who haven’t noticed the obvious and still hope for diversity utopia to come, just go to any migrant “paradise” infested with millions of Mexican migrants, like, for instance, now almost bankrupt city of Los Angeles with its “Hispanic” mayor and council members of “Hispanic” descent, and see how the “Hispanic” migrants are replicating there whatever they claim they have run away from, many of them resorting, however occasionally, to intimidation, militancy, and organized lawbreaking (make sure to notice “Hispanic” gangs, like MS-13, while in L.A.) in defending what they consider “their turf”.

But there is more to it then just statistical correlations and people’s ability or inability to perceive them, and concerted efforts to make us all suffer from engineered or self-inflicted stupidity. There is a stealth invasion that these statistics reveal but the efforts to dumb us down attempt to conceal, and open hostility towards those of us who are smart enough to notice it.

The invaders of predominantly one nationality (Mexican) and one race within that nationality (mestizos) not only are violating our borders as they please and make of our country new breeding grounds for themselves and their kin, but they also decry any meaningful measures of defence against their invasion as anti-Mexican and anti-mestizo bigotry (they use a more assaultive term: “racism”). It’s like as if Hitler’s troops during the WWII accused allies’ military of anti-Germanic discrimination because the allies were shooting at Germans and not at Poles, French, or Britons. Only a fool would get caught on such a deceitful rhetoric. I actually read an interview with an illegal “immigrant” who was lamenting that Arizona cops enforcing new trespassing law (see [2]) would not run after Norwegians but after Mexicans, and that for him was a proof of looming racism and discrimination. I wonder when the rapists will take their anger to the streets protesting sexism in prosecution of rape and demanding that police suspects of rape both man and women equally.

(Interestingly, when President Obama racially and genderly profiled his voting base, see [3], the New York Times and other flagships of anti-racism armada were not raising hell against it. The racial profiling that supports the Left’s cause is a good kind of racial profiling, I guess.)

What is even more stunning then these attempts to dumb down the American nation is the said hostility of the invaders and their advocates towards all those who refuse to be dumbed down. If you notice that illegal “immigration” through the Southern border is mostly Mexican mestizo thing then you are branded “racist”, which stigma is a form of earmarking a victim for further persecution and punishment. (Do not expect the “innocent until proven guilty” presumption here.)

You might think that those who are up in arms against “racial profiling” have noble intentions of protecting “weak minorities” from whites’ tyranny. But such presumption does not withstand closer scrutiny. What these “noble defenders” are really protecting is a gradual pre-emption of America by the invading hordes from Third World countries and other banana republics, and replacing us and our progeny with theirs. (Do I have to remind you that if you object such a replacement, which is a form of forced national cuckoldry, you are automatically labeled a “racist”? But then, would you rather be a cuckold who just loves to raise children not of his choice that don’t carry his genes and are statistically less likely than his own progeny to take good care of him when he is old, poor, and sick?)

In order for that stealth invasion to succeed, we, Americans, must be dumb enough to not notice that we are being invaded and replaced in our own country, just like the stupid frog in a pan on a stove doesn’t notice that water gets hotter and hotter until it’s too late to jump out. And anyone who refuses to be that stupid makes of himself a target of open hostility of the invaders and their advocates. Just try to say in public that in Arizona there is a strong statistical correlation between being a Spanish-speaking Mexican mestizo and being an illegal “immigrant” (an undeniable fact that should suffice as a probable cause for questioning suspected illegal alien), and the “noble” crusaders of “civil rights” will try to wreck you and your career right away.

So, indeed, they do tell us: dumb down yourself or we will make your life miserable.

Well, only a moron would yield to that blackmail. The anti-”racial profiling” calls, that turn into hysteria around first of May, only prove that we are being attacked and/or invaded by members of some specific race(s) and ethnic group(s), so these calls should prompt more vigilance, defensiveness, and suspicion towards that group and not for less. It is time for us to recognize that those who make such calls are hostile to America as we know and love, and to its legitimate people (us, that is), so they should be treated as such.

Luckily for the frog, it can sense when the water temperature rises so that it can make the last minute life-saving leap. Luckily for us, vast majority of the invaders and their progeny look quite different then we do, so that we can see with a naked eye the sweeping results of the million-man invasion and the displacement of the nation (euphemistically referred to as the “demographic shift”) that it brings. We still can save our country and our people, but in order to do so we must flatly reject all attempts of dumbing us down. The recent illegal “immigration” law passed by the Arizona legislature is a promising step in that direction that other states may wish to consider. (Bravo, Arizona!)

As to the indolent, if not obstructionist, federal government that, after dereliction of its fundamental Constitutional duty to enforce the border and the immigration laws, seems to be less than happy with the resolve of Arizona people to defend themselves against invasion of illegal “immigrants”, I have a suggestion:

Lead, follow, or get out of the way!

April 30, 2010

~ The Author ~
Mr. Dwyer has been a continuing contributor to the Federal Observer. Mark Andrew Dwyer’s commentaries (updated frequently) can be found here. Send your comments to readerswrite@yahoo.com.