Powered by Max Banner Ads 

McCutchen: Sarah Palin and the Neo-Conservative vs. Neo-Liberal Turf Wars

mccutcheon_thumbWhy was Sarah Palin chosen to run as John McCain’s V.P. candidate? That had to be much more than a random choice. Here are some questions and possible answers.

A little background for the uninformed or those in deadly denial

We know how the Cultural Marxists’ came to power in the U.S. with their “long march through the institutions” designed to infiltrate and influence all spheres of our lives, particularly in education, government, media, and all aspects of individual freedoms. By the 1920’s & 1930’s they had come to realize the “peasants” (that’s us) would never rise up in bloody revolt against their own country & culture; therefore a new plan of psychological (political correctness) warfare was hatched i.e. the long march to destroy every facet of Western civilization began in earnest, while implementing world Socialism/ Communism/Tyranny, i.e. the forced redistribution of wealth, i.e. dictatorship/slavery brought to fruition by Barack Obama, via Bush, Clinton, et al.

The struggle morphed into basically two sides of the same coin in the U.S.

I. Neo-Conservatives
The Republicans succumbed to the Neo-Conservative movement (founded by former Trotskyite/Communist Irving Kristol), and all were/are ardent Zionists/Israeli-Firsters. Their agenda was destruction of individual rights and most are followers of teacher/philosopher Leo Strauss (Univ. of Chicago). One of his guiding principles for elites was the use of deception such as “eternal war for eternal peace”, the “noble lie”….think the contrived “war on terror” (while our borders remain wide open), and the “weapons of mass destruction” deception. Strauss also taught the means justify the ends and the extreme importance of the promotion of religion among the masses in order to keep them in line while the “leaders” set the agenda. The neo-cons found patriotism and religion to be their most effective methods of deceit and they are masters in their criminally inspired “righteous” wars funded principally by taxpayers. Strauss maintained that “if no external threat exists then one must be manufactured”. What better way to get Christians to condone preemptive war than staged false-flag events?

Just a 'Babe' in the Woods???

Just a 'Babe' in the Woods???

Americans are notoriously fertile ground for emotionalism without an objective thought pattern, which allows corrupt leadership to bring us into a supportive cast for illegal, immoral and criminally inspired wars, e.g. Slovenia, Kosovo, Albania, Bosnia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and the urging by Israeli interests to attack Iran.

The wars on the Middle East were planned years in advance to enhance Israel and for enormous profits in the military/industrial/banking complex. Just a few of the notable key neo-cons are Karl Rove, Paul Wolfowitz, the Cheney’s & Bush’s, Douglas Feith, John Bolton, Chas. Krauthammer, Norman Pohdretez, Elliot Abrams, Lewis Libby, Donald Rumsfeld, Michael Chertoff, and William Kristol (son of Communist Irving).

II. Progressives/Neo-Liberals
The Democrat Party became dominated by the followers of Saul Alinsky (founder of Chicago’s Industrial Areas Foundation, dedicated to organizing the “poor & powerless”) who were trained “community organizers” (Progressives) e.g. to instill in blacks, women, disabled, gays, etc. that they are victims of cruel white Euro Founding stock males and taught to lie, cheat, and steal with impunity in what was now a politically correct world. Just to name a few adherents/activists are Barack Obama, Rahm Emanuel (“never let a good crisis go to waste”, fervent dual citizen Israeli-Firster), Van Jones (redistribute the wealth racist), Tim Geithner (you have to pay taxes, I don’t), Chuck Schumer, Barney Frank, Joe Lieberman, Jerry Nadler, David Weiner, Rob Wexler, Diane Feinstein, Barbara Boxer, Russ Feingold & virtually all the present administration & Czars.

President George Bush pushed the Straussian syndrome to the breaking point with out of control spending, unconstitutional laws and programs, relentless escalation of unconstitutional wars, open borders, illegal immigration at taxpayer expense, lack of accountability, malfeasance, misfeasance and utter disregard for what Bush called that “G-D piece of paper”….our Constitution.

Therefore, when the Obama/Alinsky inspired Democrats promised CHANGE, the U.S. public fell for it, and it didn’t take long to discover what kind of “CHANGE” was meant (Just a bit of advance background research revealed exactly who Obama was). Bankster, insurance, healthcare, automobile bail-outs in the billions, resulting in the destruction of Capitalism and the further implementation of Fascism, crime and corruption displayed by their key organizations such as ACORN, reckless spending and unaccountability reigns supreme. The corporate bailouts come from taxpayers, courtesy of politicrats. ACORN, ACLU, SPLC, LULAC, La Raza type anti-American organizations are generously funded by Communist Front Foundations, as well as taxpayers.

Now we come to Sarah Palin. Was this a brilliant move on the part of William Kristol, who “discovered” Palin on a Weekly Standard (he is editor) & National Review (another neo-con publication) Alaskan excursion to restore power to the neo-conservatives?

Kristol was also on the Board of Advisors for ENRON, and head of PNAC (Project for the New American Century…goals= Increase an already enormous military budget at the expense of domestic social programs 2) Toppling of regimes resistant to our corporate interests 3) Forcing democracy at the barrel of a gun in regions that have no history of the democratic process 4) Replacing the UN’s role of preserving and extending international order)

After decades of Harvard & Yale lawyers/career politicians whose ignorance was exceeded only by their arrogance and greed, being elected and appointed to our highest offices, perhaps Kristol took a page not only from the Obama “change” campaign strategy, but from the mood of the American citizenry and the Tea Party phenomenon

Suddenly here was Sarah Palin, beautiful, cultured but down to earth, voicing values normal patriots shared, a wife, a mother, courageous in conflict and most of all, a fervent supporter of Israel and the Mid-East wars. As an evangelical, her beliefs fell right in line with the neo-conservatives eternal war deception? Besides, Palin displayed an Israeli flag in her gubernatorial office. Bingo? Kristol went to the wall for Palin as V.P. candidate choice….against the wishes of Karl Rove and of McCain himself. Kristol prevailed.

Why Palin chose to resign her governorship when she did is still a puzzle.

Does Kristol now have a doable plan to bring the Neo-cons back into power? A tried and true religious patriot lady, who of course can and will be controlled by the forces behind the throne? Does Palin have any idea who she is dealing with? If so, how much does she know? No matter how sincere she might be, the neo-con hold on her regarding Israel and eternal wars will be her guiding light and the destruction of what is left of America inextricably follows.

At the moment it appears she has no real understanding of the neo-con methods, goals, or power. People insisted on believing in Bush because he professed religious fervor, Palin is a much more appealing icon.

mccutcheon_thumbPublished January 3, 2010 by Barbara McCutchen for Arkansas Freedom.com and submitted to the Federal Observer for publication.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

Comments: 2 Comments

2 Responses to “McCutchen: Sarah Palin and the Neo-Conservative vs. Neo-Liberal Turf Wars”

  1. DeepSeaDiver says:

    @ A Reader — You may want to actually do some reading. If that doesn’t work try logic … she was McCain’s VP candidate in 2008 recruited by Kristol. It’s so obvious to anyone who is intelligently engaged in politics today. Your rhetoric towards the left is no better than theirs to the right in the whole “Better Than” spite vote. Seeing that and the ignorance towards Ron Paul I’d say it’s a pretty safe bet your either an amateur expert or a Neo-Con yourself.

    The Real Constitutionalist and Economic Reformers are backing Ron Paul and they don’t sway on their candidate or the truth. Good luck on your continued attempts at subversion “A Reader”. We’ll be back to deprogram you after we take back our country.

    Ron Paul 2012

  2. A Reader says:

    We can easily dismiss all electable prospective candidates that at least show some promise of sticking to the Constitution and core American values. But then we will end up with Obama, or someone similar to him, nominating judges to the Federal Courts and using administrative/executive tricks to circumvent the separation of powers in his/her quest to push our country further to the Left.

    The main problem that we are facing now is that the so-called silent majority of paleo-Americans (as opposed to neo-Americans imported from Third-World countries and manufactured in American public schools and colleges) feel apathetic about the current situation and skeptical about the Washington, D.C., elites. As much as their (our) state of mind is to some extent a logical consequence of the piteous predicament, with this kind of thinking we are destined to lose, again, to the “progressives” and neo-cons.

    Sarah Palin does electrify the conservative base and she can lead us to a decisive victory in our fight to take our country back from the Left-leaning highjackers. I fail to see how portraying her as a neo-con, without credible evidence of such characterization, can save us from losing America to neo-American minority.

    It’s good to remember that what brought us into this sorry state of affairs is the engineered diversity and imposed multiculturalism that like HIV disabled our societal auto-immune system. Out of all viable prospective candidates Sarah Palin is the only one who seems like a walking contradiction to the Left’s diversity/multiculti mantra. This is one of the reasons why they keep attacking her so viciously.

    Which brings another point worth of making. The mere fact that the “Liberals” and their propaganda outlets cannot stomach Sarah Palin may be a clear indication that she is exactly the candidate that we need. I am sure that there are many good individuals that the Left despises as much as they hate Sarah Palin, but at this point they don’t seem to command any significant share of presidential votes. (Remember that it was Ross Perrot who let Bill Clinton move into the White House.)

Leave a Reply