After I wrote my column “Liberal non-elimination” three weeks ago, I was left with a distinctive feeling that I left the core of the subject of “Liberalism” unaddressed. This short analysis is intended as a make up for this lack of thoroughness.
There are so many absurdities that the “Liberals” commit.
On one hand, they give lip service to Darwin and natural evolution (footnote: Whether Darwin’s evolution theory is correct or not does not affect the validity of the argument presented here), but on the other hand they insist on “intelligently” re-engineering the human nature, by removing what they call “racism” and “greed” from it, and redoing the most complicated system that nature has created on Earth: the Western society.
I just returned from Haiti with Hebler. We flew in at 3 AM Sunday to the scene of such incredible destruction on one side, and enormous ineptitude and criminal neglect on the other.
Port of Prince is in ruins. The rest of the country is fairly intact.Our team was a rescue team and we carried special equipment that locates people buried under the rubble. There are easily 200,000 dead, the city smells like a charnal house. The bloody UN was there for 5 years doing apparently nothing but wasting US Taxpayers money.
“It’s not what they say, it is what they do.” (author - a lowly Egyptian Great-Pyramid slave from the year 3,000 BC, inscribed on a stone tablet, found under the mummified body of Pharaoh Tutanliarcommon)
“Oh yes, Mr. President, we know you have lied to us before and everything you promise never comes true, but we believe you now. Your State-of-the-Union speech was so articulate, sincere and animated, even though it is just a reflection of your Teleprompter. We know you have tried hard and that your intentions are only to seek what is good for America and the American people. We know that it is really all President Bush’s fault because for over a year now you have been saying it was his fault, so it must be his fault ….. right Mr. President?”
Sensible, intelligent Americans are furious over the recent Supreme Court 5-to-4-decision referred to as Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission that struck down limits on corporate spending in presidential and congressional elections. Those of us who wail against the corpocracy with its corruption of government could hardly believe that this decision could in any way be justified. A major reaction has been a number of groups calling for a constitutional amendment to fix the problem.
Introduction and Review By “it”, I mean direct taxation on our private personal property, including our homes, our motorized conveyances, our right to travel, our right to earn a living as we see fit, our marriages, and so on down the list of rights that are taxed, regulated, and then taxed and regulated some more.
“Honest” Abe Lincoln (even though he is one of the worst traitor/tyrants of this land of ours), said,
“I believe that every individual is naturally entitled to do as he pleases with himself and the fruits of his labor, so far as it in no way interferes with any other men’s rights.”
Hey, if it is our property and it is private and its is obtained by right, then government has no say-so whatsoever in when, how, where, or if we can use it, as private means “not under government control.”
For several years now, we have tried to convince our audience that it is not possible to win our freedom and property rights battles within the confines of the law, through the legislative or judicial branches of government. The deck is stacked against us. And certainly we will win nothing by approaching the executive branch. Even our right of initiative is under attack by the legislative branch and the courts.
I had an interesting discourse with a gentleman the other day, about what is wrong with our nation. He claimed to be a Christian; had studied the Bible; but what became obvious, in our discourse, was that he had no clue the foundation of our nation.
People ask all the time, “How did we get here? What can we do?”
Those who would disparage our Founding Fathers and the foundations of our nation are quick to point out that “not all the Founding Fathers were Christians.” They point this up as though it makes the case that our nation was not founded on Christianity.
I believe that liberty is the only genuinely valuable thing that men have invented, at least in the field of government, in a thousand years. I believe that it is better to be free than to be not free, even when the former is dangerous and the latter safe. I believe that the finest qualities of man can flourish only in free air – that progress made under the shadow of the policeman’s club is false progress, and of no permanent value. I believe that any man who takes the liberty of another into his keeping is bound to become a tyrant, and that any man who yields up his liberty, in however slight the measure, is bound to become a slave. H. L. Mencken
While no nation is perfect, because of the principles contained in our founding documents, the united states of America comes about as close to perfect as one could expect.
“There is an inviolate law in nature. Complexity in organisms can lead to the emergence of order. Biological evolution and the diversity of life on Earth is a result of that law. However, it has also been shown that too much complexity in these organisms, in almost all cases, leads to chaos and finally extinction of the organism.” – Ron Ewart
Years ago we had a small company that did business with the military, wherein we installed electronic equipment on military bases. We would get the bid specifications, submit our bid and then if accepted, wait for the contract that would seal the deal. The contract would come, consisting of a hundred pages or more and we would read it over as best we could without really knowing its full content and what would happen if their was a breach by either party, or what would happen with all the other contingencies that were buried in those pages.
"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same." ~ Ronald Reagan
After I wrote my column “Liberal non-elimination” three weeks ago, I was left with a distinctive feeling that I left the core of the subject of “Liberalism” unaddressed. This short analysis is intended as a make up for this lack of thoroughness.
