The Federal Observer

A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. ~ Marcus Tullius Cicero (42 B.C.)

~ Preface ~
Are we free people, or are we under the control of every government entity due to the 14th Amendment? Are we nothing more than privileged people – slaves – to government entities?

Do we live under a horrendous fraud perpetrated by government, or by those controlling government, binding us to obeying statutes written by officials? Are we indeed bona fide “subjects” and/or “wards of the State?”

Let me state this at this time to avoid later confusion. When “state” is used, it means the whole of the people living in a geographic area with like beliefs, mores, morality considerations, interests, etc.

When the term, “State”, is used, it means the governing body politic created primarily to protect rights. Note the capitalization of this body politic.

Although both are artificial creations of we people, the people form the states. Then, we human beings then created the States. This means that we people forming the state are sovereign to the State, which is made up of artificial persons called “officials.” The officials then have the honorable task of defending the rights of the people that created the office.

Obviously, the created cannot be superior to the creator, just as we of mankind, the created, cannot be superior to our Creator, Nature’s God. Sovereignty therefore lies with the creator, not the created.

Note: In their private lives, officials are part of the sovereign people with equal rights. It is in their official lives that they are artificial parts of the artificial government and subservient to the people.

~ Introduction to 14th Amendment Concerns ~
Of late, my studies led me to writings that in order to declare ourselves as a member of the sovereignty that we must prove our genealogy back, I presume, to the founding of America, to the “We the People” that existed at that time.

To clarify, it seems there is a belief that without a record of our families dating back to the “founders,” the people that lived in the newly formed states at the time, that we are not members of the sovereignty or, in other words, are not part of the Posterity delineated in the Declaration.

I presume the meaning is that without such records, we are all naturalized 14th Amendment “citizens of the United States”, even though the 14th did not exist until 1868. If this is true, then we people held as NOT of the Posterity, and therefore not of the sovereignty, are subject to congressional and State mandates.

Do I believe that was the intent of the Declaration and of the Constitution for these united States of America? Or, that our Law and human rights are dependent on tracing our roots back to the original colonists? Not no, but hell no.

~ Myths and Demons ~
These are many myths that need dispelled. There are also many demons that need exposed. The demons are not those that necessarily rise up from Hell but they are already amongst us as fiends and evil spirits. Surely, the reader can determine who the fiends and evil spirits amongst us are.

One of the myths is that the State is sovereign over the people, and, a second, that the Constitution for these united States of America does not bind state officials to the Constitution’s provisions. Both, as I hope every American knows deep down, are false.

Our Law and statutes bind every official to the Constitution through Article VI and, hence, its other applicable provisions, as the Constitution is the supreme Law of the Land. Do we all not know that the Constitution’s purpose is NOT to grant rights, but to limit any government and any creation of the government from infringing upon our rights?

Who stood to gain from such myths? Do the people? Or do those who intend on overthrowing America and the freedom of the American people, the last Western and primarily white people the evildoers need to conquer?

Applying qui bono, we can make no mistake as to who benefits. Obviously government benefits. This includes elected officials and their special agents, such as enforcers and administrative executives of de facto laws. Of maybe greater importance, though, are the enemies of America that benefit by controlling those in government.

Thus, the preliminary conclusion is that government perpetrated the myth of State sovereignty over the people, and possibly at the behest of their hidden behind the scenes controllers. Furthermore, since the Constitution nor the Declaration, nor the Laws of Nature’s God authorize such, most conclude that government entities absolutely have NO power to make laws governing the people.

We must also consider that if one believes artificial entities do have the authority to rule over the people, then one engages in idolatry, worshiping what is generally a bunch of dips that have no idea of the true de jure America.

Such people listen to State creations called “attorneys”, a private club apparently given wide authority by the State when in fact the State does not have the authority to give this cult-like club special standing. People treat these denizens from hell (in most cases, but not all) as if they spout the word of God, rather than the garbage most of them spew forth.

Furthermore, members of the cult treat our people as rather ignorant second-class citizens. Also, the State and its agents/attorneys further treat all the people as “persons” known as corporations and/or artificial entities created by the 14th Amendment and other means. They then use this massive fraud to transfer our property to the King, right along with our sovereignty.

It seems Satan directs these agents for the State, as they ignore the laws of Nature’s God, our Creator. They seem to believe that the “King” is the State that created them, and then fooled the people into believing only these “persons” could practice Law. Woe be to the attorney that does not obey his lord and master, the State and the Bar association that is associated with the International Bar Association of England.

The Constitution (or a state’s constitution) never gave such authority to judges, attorneys, or judge/attorneys, or to any other artificial entity. Read the 5th Amendment and tell me which part defines “counsel” as Bar attorneys, a creation maybe not even by the States but by a specific club that demands dues and, I suspect, mandated behavior NOT in line with protecting the rights of the people.

After all, what “courts” do we American people go to when “tried” for “mala prohibita” so-called crimes? Does the government try people accused of such crimes in courts of record or in tribunals under the court martial flag of the United States Military? We must also ask if the tribunals are held in the Common Law jurisdiction of the people or in a jurisdiction foreign to the people? In other words, are the accused a party to a contract that could place them in a jurisdiction other than Common Law?

“Why, no,” you might answer. “Such cases are in the Admiralty/maritime and military court martial tribunals shown by the yellow-fringed US flag displayed in the courtroom, and not in courts of Law. (See Army Regulation No. 260-10, which makes the yellow-fringed flag a military flag with designated uses. By Army Regulation 260-10, the gold fringe may be used only on regimental “colors,” the President’s flag, for military courts martial, and the flags used at military recruiting centers. See also AR 840-10, Oct. 1, 1979, which states “such flags are flown indoors, only in military courtrooms” and that the Gold Fringed Flag is not to be carried by anyone except units of the United States Army, and the United States Army division associations. (My emphasis) Note: There are also presidential executive orders that essentially declare the same.)

Thus, we continue with our possible answer, “Corrupt persons converted courts to jurisdictions we do not in our private lives stand in. Such removes all constitutionally secured rights and, hence, freedom.”

Besides, imagine a figure, any figure, in your mind. Got it? Now, intentionally damage the figure in a criminal fashion, such as assaulting it.

Can you do it? Did you physically damage the imaginary figure? Could your imaginary figure face you, the accused, in a court of law, in which the image has the right to have redress granted to it?

Of course not. You may intentionally damage the non-human, non-substance figure in your mind; that goes without saying. However, could we define such damage as a true (mala in se) crime, an act that intentionally violated human inherent and inalienable rights? The answer is obviously, “No.” Imaginary entities do not have human rights to violate.

Well, Folks, the accuser that coerces our people into municipal courts, most often created by the State and State-created incorporated CITIES OF YOU ARE SCREWED governments, has no rights one can violate because it is as imaginary as the image in your mind. The accuser, you see, is impossible to face because it has NO substance.

Chanceries, which all State created courts are, try to say a cop is your accuser but did you intentionally damage him? Does the enforcer even have human rights in his “cop” persona?

Did he see you in the act of committing a mala in se crime against another Citizen? Did he present an indictment, and possibly an order for arrest, from a Grand Jury of your peers? Or, did he instead act as prosecutor, judge, and jury denying you counsel, as he questioned you? (By the way, a prosecutor is actually the Citizen filing the complaint of a crime to the Grand Jury. It is always a human being, not an artificial person, as all State created entities are.)

As a matter of its jurisdiction, do you believe government can prove that you or I have a contract in the Admiralty/Maritime jurisdiction? Can it prove that we are subject to the jurisdiction of any military organization, and, further, that we are not American Citizens the supreme Law of the Land protects?

Lacking such a contract, or a contract as a member of the US Military, government should be powerless against us. If not, then are we still free human beings?

The question is – do we have to prove lack of jurisdiction or does the State have to prove jurisdiction? This is the topic of a future article, but suffice it to say for now, that once one challenges jurisdiction, the government must prove jurisdiction. Although one could list a plethora of cases, the following case fits quite well into the instant topic, and the administrative system we usually face.

“However, once jurisdiction has been challenged in the courts, it becomes the responsibility of the Plaintiff [Prosecutor] to assert and prove jurisdiction.” (Hagans v. Lavine, 415 US 533)…”

“The law requires proof of jurisdiction to appear on the record of the administrative agency and all administrative proceedings.” Hagans v Lavine, 415 U.S. 528.

Note that it is therefore up to the State to prove we are NOT fully protected American people, which might then give it jurisdiction over us.

Additionally, I believe the founders were wise enough to know that foreigners would come to our land and strive to learn English, our customs, and our Law. They knew that many would strive to assimilate as citizens, accepting our language, mores, morals, and so on as their own. (Note: The last statement does not in any manner indicate these people must forget their heritage in order to become American citizens.)

I also believe foreigners immigrated to our land and worked hard to become state citizens in order that their progeny would be by birthright Citizens of these united States of America via their natural birth in one of the many states.

“The object then to be attained, by the exercise of the power of naturalization, was to make citizens of the respective States.” - [Ex Parte Knowles, 5 Cal. 300 (1855)]

Think about it. Why else would dedicated documented foreigners work so hard to become naturalized citizens if one’s offspring would remain as slaves to the US Government Corporation or a bunch of local yokels believing they are God’s gift to Mankind? I am sure you know the type.

Let me state here that babies born to some illegal alien within one of the states are NOT anchor babies. In other words, a undocumented pregnant Mexican woman cannot step across the southern border, give birth, and her baby automatically born as a by birthright American Citizen. Both the woman and her baby are nothing more than illegal aliens and should strive for the proper documentation or be deported immediately with any hospital bills charged to the offending country, not paid for by the alleged “taxpayers” of America.

Of course, those people who are Americans by birth but not in heart, mind, and soul that support illegal aliens in order to obtain cheap labor are committing criminal acts against true Americans. They are, quite simply, traitors, aiding and abetting the enemies of America.

So, the question is – if we are not directly descended from the people who lived in the colonies at the time of the unanimous Declaration of Independence, are we also slaves to the government?

I.e., does government then have plenary power to rule over us? It does within its bona fide jurisdictional areas led, of course, by the District of Columbia, but can such rule extend to we people that make up the states?

Does one not recognize this for the crappola it is, that it is against everything this land of ours was founded on?

At any rate, you can believe that if you want but I believe it is pure garbage set up by attorneys and other State entities that act as enemies of America by working to transfer all property to the quite evil International banking cartel.

~ The 14th Amendment and Its Jurisdiction, or Lack Thereof ~
Maybe it is just pure coincidence, which I do not believe in when it comes to our rights, but I think the continued application of the 14th Amendment to people born to naturalized parents is improper if in fact that is what is going on. After all, it was a post-War of Northern Aggression act to assure slaves and their descendants had equal rights to those of our people secured by the Constitution.

Amendment XIV, Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

First, note the separation between the United States and “state.” Why is that? Well, the District of Columbia, a ten-mile square area that is in fact foreign to the many states of America, houses the United States Government and is named the United States in the Constitution.

The Constitution defining this area as the United States also declares that its jurisdiction extends only to the geographic and enclave areas dictated by Article I, Section 8, Clauses 17 and 18, and Article IV in regard to territories. Thus, its jurisdiction does NOT include the states or the people making up the states.

The United States has jurisdiction over naturalized citizens, as the Congress legislatively creates them as privileged entities, even if they live within one of the many states. That is the common belief but one might question this belief, as shown below.

To continue with the common belief, and one the high courts support, people born to naturalized citizens within one of the many states are not “persons” in law but are natural born people. An act of Congress did NOT create them. This automatically means they are state citizens, which is to say Citizens of the United States of America. They therefore have inherent, inalienable rights secured by the Constitution, not privileges granted by government.

So, it appears that we have two classes of citizens. The first class is “citizens of the United States” (note – did not exist prior to the 14th Amendment – Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Ed.), who are privileged entities (persons) created legislatively.

The other class is “Citizens of the United States of America” that are born within one of the many states, whether to naturalized parents or not. They are not, in other words, persons created legislatively but are people created by natural means. I know this is a hard concept to grasp, but “persons in law” are figments of our imaginations, while people have souls and substance.

The statement below tells us a great deal about the intent of the naturalization organization, and, is no doubt quite a shock to those stating that one must prove sovereignty membership. It also brings up the question alluded to earlier.

~ The Meaning of American Citizenship ~
Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization: “Today you have become a citizen of the United States of America. You are no longer an Englishman, a Frenchman, an Italian, a Pole. Neither are you a hyphenated-American — a Polish-American, an Italian-American. You are no longer a subject of a government. Henceforth, you are an integral part of this Government - a free man - a Citizen of the United States of America.”

Regardless of the implications of the Commissioner’s statement, it is certain that the general treatment is that government controls its creations. Thus, it seems logical that there would be two classes of citizens, one under control of the government, and one NOT under control of government. Is this the case?

Also, if the Commissioner’s statements are correct, is it not true that the only persons under US control are those that are documented and earning the status as a citizen of a state, a Citizen of the United States of America? Once earned, is it not also true that the individual is no longer a subject of government and, hence, free with the same inherent, inalienable rights of by birthright Citizens?

Also, we must consider the meaning of “person” in the 14th. Is it a term with technical import or not?

We begin with the Slaughter House Cases, none overturned, that found a clear distinction between state citizens and citizens of the United States. State citizens are members of the sovereign, while “citizens of the United States” are subjects of Congress.

“That there is a citizenship of the United States and a citizenship of a state, and the privileges and immunities of one are not the same as the other is well established by the decisions of the courts of this country. The leading cases upon the subjects are those decided by the Supreme Court of the United States and reported in 16 Wall. 36, 21 L. Ed. 394, and known as the Slaughter House Cases. [K. Tashiro v. Jordan, 256 P. 545, 549 (1927)] [affirmed 278 U.S. 123 (1928)]” [Taken from “The Federal Zone”, by Paul Andrew Mitchell – highly recommended by the author]

State citizenship requires that one is born within one of the many states to citizens of the united States of America. The naturalization process creates state citizens. This is according to the immigration and naturalization Commissioner and Ex Parte Knowles, supra,

Because this newly born American was not born or lives in the District of Columbia or one of the States of the United States (Island possessions), or its territories, then the child does NOT fall under the jurisdiction of the United States even though his parents do.

Next, we have many supreme Court decisions, which clearly define who and what the sovereignty is, beginning with this 1793 case, the second case by the supreme Court of Article III.

“The same feudal ideas run through all their jurisprudence, and constantly remind us of the distinction between the Prince and the subject. No such ideas obtain here; at the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people; and they are truly the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects (unless the African slaves among us may be so called) and have none to govern but themselves; the citizens of America are equal as fellow citizens, and as joint tenants in the sovereignty.” CHISHOLM v. STATE OF GA., 2 U.S. 419 (1793)

And, then these never overturned cases:

“They [state citizens] are what we familiarly call the ‘sovereign people,’ and every citizen is one of this people, and a constituent member of this sovereignty.” [Dred Scott v. Sandford, 19 How. 393 (1856)]

Many writers state that the created cannot be greater than the creator. In other words, government as the created can never be supreme to the people, the creator.

Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law; but in our system, while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts. Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 370 (1886)

“There, every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowman without his consent.” CRUDEN v. NEALE, 2 N.C. 338 (1796) 2 S.E.

“No fiction can make a natural born subject.” Milvaine v. Coxe’s Lessee, 8 U.S. 598 (1808)

Literally thousands of standing higher court decisions support the above, and also support that the people are NOT considered “14th Amendment citizens” rather than Citizens of these United States of America. A question this leads to is, do State or local officials have the authority to overturn such cases? No, they absolutely do not.

It is prudent to presume that officials writing amendments or whatever know the meanings of the words they use. They also know that a “person” in law is not the same as the term “people” or how people use it in everyday usage.

In fact, anyone having studied statute construct, legalese by attorneys and the like, and the methods government use to mislead the American people know the statutory meaning of “person” is not the same as the meaning of “people.” After all, the plural of person is not people. Also, the writers of the 14th could just as well used the term “people” or “human being” instead of person.

Therefore, the conclusion is that the term “person” used in the 14th Amendment denotes a term of technical import. This is in line with officials guided by the legal profession using the term with the intent to mislead and defraud the people. Hence, we see the use of ‘person’ in millions of statutes, ordinances, and so-called “public policy” by legislators of the federal, State, and local quasi governments.

However, and of primary importance, is that by Law and decisions of the highest courts sovereign people are subject only to the Common (Natural) Law, that sovereigns are never subject to their own creations, and that “person” does not refer to human beings unless so defined.

Furthermore, we see that according to the principles of freedom preserved by the Magna Charter, the Declaration, Nature’s God, and the Constitution for these united States of America that no fiction, be it a corporation, a statute, administrative regulation, or so-called “public policy” can change a sovereign into a fiction that is subject to his own creations, or that all people not in the lineage of the colonists are fictions created by government.

~ Conclusion and Statements of Relevance ~
I believe the application of the 14th Amendment to all Americans, whether descended from the original colonists or not, is part of a planned operation to overthrow America and its sovereignty. It is a devious plan led by quite mad satanic scumbags within the States and their political subdivisions working in conjunction with the out-of-our-control and foreign-controlled federal government.

Our once de jure governing bodies politic were converted through force and fraud to de facto government, led by the foreign power controlling the conversion through thousands of lies, trainloads of misleading information, control of false systems of “justice”, and coercive force of all forms, including deadly force. The intent is to destroy our inherent, unalienable rights, thereby creating a huge God-less, Satanic slave plantation out of America.

Why would our elected local and state officials work against the principles of freedom, and of Nature’s Law and God laid down by our founding document? Why else except for greed and lust for power.

Every human being on this good Earth is born with inherent, unalienable rights. The difference between America as established and other countries is that we have the Declaration that in essence establishes our Law, with constitutions (contractual agreements) meant to protect our Law and our rights.

In other words, the original people wished to establish a land where people could live free of government intrusion into their lives; where they could enjoy and regulate their property they obtained through their own hard work; and where they could pursue happiness.

Our forefathers risked their lives and fortunes to give it to all who followed them, whether by bloodlines or not. Their intent was to leave their posterity with a land in which the people are the sovereignty.

I believe our founders intended fully on very limited government with absolutely no interference in our rights and our free will. I believe they had the foresight and advanced thinking to know that civilization could not advance without freethinking, writing, and speaking by our people.

I do NOT and CANNOT believe they intended to set it up for bureaucrats to interpret anything they recorded for posterity in a manner to expand government’s control. They knew, as we do now, that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely, and, therefore, the intent was to prohibit abusive authority. They did not intend on any governing body, except for the whole of the people to have the power to create, or change, government.

The fault, you see, is not the lack of our forefathers’ intent to insure artificial persons do not interpret any of our founding documents to the benefit of government and other artificial entities. It is rather the contrary.

However, they presumed we would be diligent in protecting our rights, including weeding out officials lacking in integrity and honor, and that we would not allow entanglements with foreign powers. Their faith in the people remaining vigilant is, in my opinion, their only failing, if one can call it that. After all, they did not fail us – we have failed them (and ourselves).

If the intent of the 14th Amendment was to give officials the power to declare all we Americans are in a privileged class granted by Congress, then it is, of course, unconstitutional from its inception, particularly since it does NOT repeal any portion of the Constitution or declare the Declaration invalid, or make the Laws of our Creator of non-affect. To say otherwise are the words of a traitor, or a Satanist, aiding and abetting the enemies of the American people.

By the way, did I mention Congress never properly installed the 14th as an Amendment to the Constitution? One site that one can educate themselves with (a site I just discovered for myself, as I had to research whether the 14th is lawful or not) is: http://www.barefootsworld.net/14uncon.html

It is clear that since the lead up to and the War of Northern Aggression, and then the inception of the Federal Reserve Act, and the expansion of the unholy system of injustice that evolved, that the destruction of justice and America is the intent of officials controlled by the International bankers and their fellow tribal members. They are in every sense making war against us, including the application of armed confrontations against people that have NOT committed a true crime.

“Whenever legislators endeavor to take away and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a state of war with the people, who are thereupon absolved from any further obedience.” - John Locke, 1690

Thus, one must conclude that our enemies are not from without, excepting for the International bankers. Our enemies are from within (including also such clods as the Rockefellers and others of their ilk that may live here but are far from being true Americans). Our enemies are amoral, honor-less, non-righteous, filthy-minded (pedophiles, etc.), Christian hating, Satan-worshipping fiends that could care less for any others (including their own posterity).

If they do care but act against human rights and the real America, then obviously the above outside forces control them. Apparently, the tribe of evil anti-Christian, anti-American foreign-led banking cartel gained control because of officials’ indiscretions and/or their willingness to overthrow America for a few stinking federal reserve dollars and their psychopathic lust for power over other people.

Every act against the people of our land is an act of treason and/or war. If the act demands plenary compliance by us and uses coercive techniques, misleading information, armed and dangerous enforcers, and other means to force compliance, then the acts are acts of treason and domestic terrorism.

I, for one, am a human being. I also am an American, a by birthright Citizen of the united States of America, and not a man given privileges by the 14th Amendment, or any other rule of government. I do not have to prove my membership in the sovereignty; government has to prove its jurisdiction over me.

Fraud and terrorism by government prevails, as do millions of crimes committed against our people by government every year. One cannot state this too often or too loudly.

~ Solution ~
There are many instances in which people have written asking, “What can we do?” The answer to this is quite simple to talk about, but quite difficult to carry out, as our people must overcome their fear of government. It saddens me tremendously but the fact is that 99 percent of our people will not confront government, even such trivial quasi governments as that of small towns and cities.

We people need to quit believing the lies and simply quit obeying statutes written to control government and its creations, and to put out of office any officials or agents working for them (cops and the like) and, in extreme cases, prosecute, convict, and execute them for treason.

Until government learns to fear the people, matters will worsen, until our people will not travel or walk about without worrying about an attack against their person by armed and dangerous enforcers, and then heavily fined, imprisoned, tortured, and many other acts of madmen carried out against them.

You are a member of the sovereignty if born to naturalized or people formerly born to 14th Amendment citizens or are direct descendants of our founding colonists. You are not in any class of “persons” controllable by government. No government official can interfere your inherent, unalienable rights. You are a member of the sovereignty and you and your fellow Americans hold the power over ALL governing bodies politic.

It is, therefore, believe it or not, your duty to yourself, your family, your friends, your posterity, and your country to NOT obey the government. You are not within its jurisdiction, nor does it have in personam jurisdiction over you. The people assure freedom by demanding the government remains subservient to the people and by demanding all frauds and other criminal actions by government cease.

It is up to us, People. We either live in freedom by living free, just as Nature’s God intended, or we allow the tyranny within to rot the soul of our beloved land – the real America.

Submitted to the Federal Observer by the author.

~ The Author ~
Ed Lewis has been widely published on the Internet for several years prior to the last two, when he took a sort of sabbatical to somewhat helplessly watch America being manipulated onto the road to ruin. He holds BS degrees in Biology and Psychology, National Honor Society in both fields, and MS coursework and research in Psychology completed.

Lewis is a 64-year old Vietnam Era veteran that believes every official should be held accountable for treason and other crimes when Law, statutes, and their Oaths of Office are violated.

He believes that every American has the duty to stand against any government or chartered quasi-government that violates the rights of the people, and that no man, or group of men, especially foreign lobbyists and dual citizen people, have the authority and/or the right to interfere in our land and tell us what we might think, say, write, and do. Fear to do so will ultimately destroy America.

Contact Mr. Lewis at with@cvalley.net

Tags:

This entry was posted by The Publisher on Wednesday, December 30th, 2009 at 12:22 PM and is filed under • Rear Window. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.