<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TARGET: Schumer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.federalobserver.com/2009/11/17/target-schumer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.federalobserver.com/2009/11/17/target-schumer/</link>
	<description>Re-examining &#039;Truth&#039; in America</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:57:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Camelia Wolpert</title>
		<link>http://www.federalobserver.com/2009/11/17/target-schumer/comment-page-1/#comment-47155</link>
		<dc:creator>Camelia Wolpert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 13:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.federalobserver.com/?p=6147#comment-47155</guid>
		<description>I like what you guys are up also. Such intelligent work and reporting! Carry on the excellent works guys I’ve incorporated you guys to my blogroll. I think it will improve the value of my web site :) Executive Elite, 18a Greycoat Gardens, Greycoat Street, London, SW1P 2QA, 028 2088 0135</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like what you guys are up also. Such intelligent work and reporting! Carry on the excellent works guys I’ve incorporated you guys to my blogroll. I think it will improve the value of my web site :) Executive Elite, 18a Greycoat Gardens, Greycoat Street, London, SW1P 2QA, 028 2088 0135</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tad Voetsch</title>
		<link>http://www.federalobserver.com/2009/11/17/target-schumer/comment-page-1/#comment-13944</link>
		<dc:creator>Tad Voetsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 19:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.federalobserver.com/?p=6147#comment-13944</guid>
		<description>A single third party voice for BBC within the Tv show. He has a actually hard immigration plan. They managed to graduate about the Harvard School. Right now he has their a single Airwaves Show. He don&#039;t such as that Nation leader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A single third party voice for BBC within the Tv show. He has a actually hard immigration plan. They managed to graduate about the Harvard School. Right now he has their a single Airwaves Show. He don&#8217;t such as that Nation leader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Federal Observer &#187; Anderson: I&#8217;ve had about enough</title>
		<link>http://www.federalobserver.com/2009/11/17/target-schumer/comment-page-1/#comment-8588</link>
		<dc:creator>The Federal Observer &#187; Anderson: I&#8217;ve had about enough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 16:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.federalobserver.com/?p=6147#comment-8588</guid>
		<description>[...] Previously on the Federal Observer from Doug Anderson: TARGET: Schumer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Previously on the Federal Observer from Doug Anderson: TARGET: Schumer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Federal Observer &#187; Target: Napolitano</title>
		<link>http://www.federalobserver.com/2009/11/17/target-schumer/comment-page-1/#comment-5378</link>
		<dc:creator>The Federal Observer &#187; Target: Napolitano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 04:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.federalobserver.com/?p=6147#comment-5378</guid>
		<description>[...] ~ Forewords ~ What follows is worth your time and consideration. What you are about to read, is by Douglas R. Anderson, who previously provided us with his lengthy reprimand of the illustrious Senator from New Yawk, Charles Schumer. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ~ Forewords ~ What follows is worth your time and consideration. What you are about to read, is by Douglas R. Anderson, who previously provided us with his lengthy reprimand of the illustrious Senator from New Yawk, Charles Schumer. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldguy</title>
		<link>http://www.federalobserver.com/2009/11/17/target-schumer/comment-page-1/#comment-4447</link>
		<dc:creator>oldguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 06:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.federalobserver.com/?p=6147#comment-4447</guid>
		<description>Apply the &quot;RULE&quot; of 30-06</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apply the &#8220;RULE&#8221; of 30-06</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teresa</title>
		<link>http://www.federalobserver.com/2009/11/17/target-schumer/comment-page-1/#comment-4399</link>
		<dc:creator>Teresa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.federalobserver.com/?p=6147#comment-4399</guid>
		<description>Mexican law states it&#039;s a felony to be an illegal in Mexico - Double-speak?

Website is here - http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/lillpop022707.htm

Excellent work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mexican law states it&#8217;s a felony to be an illegal in Mexico &#8211; Double-speak?</p>
<p>Website is here &#8211; <a href="http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/lillpop022707.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/lillpop022707.htm</a></p>
<p>Excellent work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brittancus</title>
		<link>http://www.federalobserver.com/2009/11/17/target-schumer/comment-page-1/#comment-4336</link>
		<dc:creator>Brittancus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.federalobserver.com/?p=6147#comment-4336</guid>
		<description>We think that today&#039;s administration under President Obama or previous political parties had a goal of enforcing our immigration laws. But corrupt politicians intervened on behalf of the open border fanatics and special interest lobbyists. As with E-Verify that has become a spotlighted enforcement law, because it was originally nearly tabled by Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA). But public uproar caused them to forcibly change their decisions and fully fund E-Verify for another 3 years. WITHOUT PUBLIC SUPPORT THEY WOULD NOT HAVE CAVED-IN?  Right now it is the--ONLY--true enforcement tool implemented, but it is only as good--IF--business owners are forced to use it. Even though hundreds of thousands of companies have now decided to apply it, yet it is not MANDATORY?  It is up to the discretion of employers? In a few states Representatives have introduced it into law, as with the fed&#039;s issuing an ultimatum that all contractors/subcontractors must use E-Verify. Remember E-Verify does not need buses for deportation? Those here will self-deport. It will take time, but without access to jobs--THEY EVENTUALLY WILL LEAVE.  THEY CALL IT &quot;ATTRITION?&quot;

Justifiably bloggers should be either criticized for their anti-sovereignty stand, or praised for informing the unaware public of the taxpayers money needed to fund a 2009-2010 Comprehensive Immigration Reform. Rewarding the millions already illegally squatting here, with the costs to support families, children and those kin who will come here through sponsorship. THEN THE MILLIONS MORE WHO HAVE HEARD THE CALL FOR AMNESTY AND RUSH TO GET HERE FROM POOR NATIONS, BEFORE THE NEW LAW MATERIALIZES?

House Judiciary Committee&#039;s Ranking Member Lamar Smith (R-Texas) wrote an op-ed for the Washington Times today He stated that the Washington Times had slammed the Obama Administration for hardened enforcement. While the opposite reaction came from the open border advocates saying there was too much enforcement. However Rep. Smith determined the opposite?  This is his statement:-

    * Rescinding of the &quot;no-match&quot; rule that prevents the Social Security Administration from contacting employers when a new hires name and social security number don&#039;t match their records. &quot;Without this protection, many employers will continue to employ individuals they know are illegal and are taking jobs that should go to citizens and legal residents,&quot; Smith said.

    * Repeal of REAL ID in lieu of PASS ID, which makes it easier for illegal aliens to obtain a driver&#039;s license. &quot;This makes it easier for illegal immigrants to stay in the country. And it can provide terrorists with a legitimate ID - as we saw with the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorists, who between them obtained 30 driver&#039;s licenses and ID cards,&quot; Smith said.

    * Lack of funding for an airport biometric exit system that is part of a DHS proposal to monitor when foreign visitors leave the country. &quot;40 percent of all 12 million to 20 million illegal immigrants in the United States entered the country legally but overstayed their visas. This program will show who did not leave the country when they should have,&quot; Smith said.

    * Restricted the 287(g) program by limiting the ways local law enforcement officials can help federal immigration enforcement officials.

    * No funding for border fence, which was required by the Secure Fence Act of 2006.

    * Signing the CHIP bill making it easier for illegal aliens to get health care.

    * Reduced work site enforcement by shifting the focus away from the illegal workers and onto the businesses that hire them.

    * Allow states to provide in-state tuition to illegal aliens even though it violate federal law.

Reading the &lt;em&gt;Washington Times&lt;/em&gt; indicates to me, that they are pro illegal immigration, that  is not in  the American  workers interest. They have consistently reacted to any enforcement of laws. They are obviously adverse to any immigration restriction, as the majority of the national press have indicated to us. Unlike the rural media who do not condone DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano&#039;s rush to OVERPOPULATION through another BLANKET AMNESTY? Grade your Senator of Congressman/Woman on NUMBERSUSA website. Call them and reprimand them for approving another AMNESTY or anything else at 202-224-3121. The people of America have been blindsided to long and must become more involved. We all no by now we cannot trust our government anymore to do the right thing for all of us. To survive we must fight back or financially--SINK. Washington is truly a corrupt place, where taxpayers money is the bargaining chip. Read all at JUDICIAL WATCH, CAPSWEB, ALIPAC, AMERICAN PATROL &amp; THE DARK SIDE OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We think that today&#8217;s administration under President Obama or previous political parties had a goal of enforcing our immigration laws. But corrupt politicians intervened on behalf of the open border fanatics and special interest lobbyists. As with E-Verify that has become a spotlighted enforcement law, because it was originally nearly tabled by Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA). But public uproar caused them to forcibly change their decisions and fully fund E-Verify for another 3 years. WITHOUT PUBLIC SUPPORT THEY WOULD NOT HAVE CAVED-IN?  Right now it is the&#8211;ONLY&#8211;true enforcement tool implemented, but it is only as good&#8211;IF&#8211;business owners are forced to use it. Even though hundreds of thousands of companies have now decided to apply it, yet it is not MANDATORY?  It is up to the discretion of employers? In a few states Representatives have introduced it into law, as with the fed&#8217;s issuing an ultimatum that all contractors/subcontractors must use E-Verify. Remember E-Verify does not need buses for deportation? Those here will self-deport. It will take time, but without access to jobs&#8211;THEY EVENTUALLY WILL LEAVE.  THEY CALL IT &#8220;ATTRITION?&#8221;</p>
<p>Justifiably bloggers should be either criticized for their anti-sovereignty stand, or praised for informing the unaware public of the taxpayers money needed to fund a 2009-2010 Comprehensive Immigration Reform. Rewarding the millions already illegally squatting here, with the costs to support families, children and those kin who will come here through sponsorship. THEN THE MILLIONS MORE WHO HAVE HEARD THE CALL FOR AMNESTY AND RUSH TO GET HERE FROM POOR NATIONS, BEFORE THE NEW LAW MATERIALIZES?</p>
<p>House Judiciary Committee&#8217;s Ranking Member Lamar Smith (R-Texas) wrote an op-ed for the Washington Times today He stated that the Washington Times had slammed the Obama Administration for hardened enforcement. While the opposite reaction came from the open border advocates saying there was too much enforcement. However Rep. Smith determined the opposite?  This is his statement:-</p>
<p>    * Rescinding of the &#8220;no-match&#8221; rule that prevents the Social Security Administration from contacting employers when a new hires name and social security number don&#8217;t match their records. &#8220;Without this protection, many employers will continue to employ individuals they know are illegal and are taking jobs that should go to citizens and legal residents,&#8221; Smith said.</p>
<p>    * Repeal of REAL ID in lieu of PASS ID, which makes it easier for illegal aliens to obtain a driver&#8217;s license. &#8220;This makes it easier for illegal immigrants to stay in the country. And it can provide terrorists with a legitimate ID &#8211; as we saw with the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorists, who between them obtained 30 driver&#8217;s licenses and ID cards,&#8221; Smith said.</p>
<p>    * Lack of funding for an airport biometric exit system that is part of a DHS proposal to monitor when foreign visitors leave the country. &#8220;40 percent of all 12 million to 20 million illegal immigrants in the United States entered the country legally but overstayed their visas. This program will show who did not leave the country when they should have,&#8221; Smith said.</p>
<p>    * Restricted the 287(g) program by limiting the ways local law enforcement officials can help federal immigration enforcement officials.</p>
<p>    * No funding for border fence, which was required by the Secure Fence Act of 2006.</p>
<p>    * Signing the CHIP bill making it easier for illegal aliens to get health care.</p>
<p>    * Reduced work site enforcement by shifting the focus away from the illegal workers and onto the businesses that hire them.</p>
<p>    * Allow states to provide in-state tuition to illegal aliens even though it violate federal law.</p>
<p>Reading the <em>Washington Times</em> indicates to me, that they are pro illegal immigration, that  is not in  the American  workers interest. They have consistently reacted to any enforcement of laws. They are obviously adverse to any immigration restriction, as the majority of the national press have indicated to us. Unlike the rural media who do not condone DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano&#8217;s rush to OVERPOPULATION through another BLANKET AMNESTY? Grade your Senator of Congressman/Woman on NUMBERSUSA website. Call them and reprimand them for approving another AMNESTY or anything else at 202-224-3121. The people of America have been blindsided to long and must become more involved. We all no by now we cannot trust our government anymore to do the right thing for all of us. To survive we must fight back or financially&#8211;SINK. Washington is truly a corrupt place, where taxpayers money is the bargaining chip. Read all at JUDICIAL WATCH, CAPSWEB, ALIPAC, AMERICAN PATROL &amp; THE DARK SIDE OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hippybiker</title>
		<link>http://www.federalobserver.com/2009/11/17/target-schumer/comment-page-1/#comment-4329</link>
		<dc:creator>hippybiker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.federalobserver.com/?p=6147#comment-4329</guid>
		<description>I must compliment the the author on a very balanced, thoughtful and well written piece. However, the target of this very heart felt discord is in fact a slime sucking, anti American, Zionist piece of Camel dung, who could give a Rats Ass less what honest, tax paying and hard working Americans think. His only concern is stuffing his and the other greedy coin shavers of his ilk; that are purposely raping us and our once great Republic,.And, the Son Of A Bitch knows it full well! hb AARP 3%er!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must compliment the the author on a very balanced, thoughtful and well written piece. However, the target of this very heart felt discord is in fact a slime sucking, anti American, Zionist piece of Camel dung, who could give a Rats Ass less what honest, tax paying and hard working Americans think. His only concern is stuffing his and the other greedy coin shavers of his ilk; that are purposely raping us and our once great Republic,.And, the Son Of A Bitch knows it full well! hb AARP 3%er!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

