Powered by Max Banner Ads 

Ronald Reagan Speaks out on Socialized Medicine

reagan_thumb1961My name is Ronald Reagan. I have been asked to talk on several subjects that have to do with the problems of the day. It must seem presumptuous to some of you that a member of my profession would stand here and attempt to talk to anyone on serious problems that face the nation and the world. It would be strange if it were otherwise.

Most of us in Hollywood are very well aware of the concept or the misconception that many people, our fellow citizens, have about people in show business. It was only a generation ago that people of my profession couldn’t be buried in the churchyard. Of course the world has improved since then, we can be buried now. As a matter of fact, the eagerness of somebody to perform that service gets frightening at times.

Now back in 1927 an American socialist, Norman Thomas, six times candidate for president on the Socialist Party ticket, said the American people would never vote for socialism. But he said under the name of liberalism the American people will adopt every fragment of the socialist program.

There are many ways in which our government has invaded the precincts of private citizens, the method of earning a living. Our government is in business to the extent of owing more than 19,000 businesses covering 47 different lines of activity. This amounts to a fifth of the total industrial capacity of the United States.

But at the moment I’d like to talk about another way, because this threat is with us and at the moment is more imminent.

One of the traditional methods of imposing statism or socialism on a people has been by way of medicine. It’s very easy to disguise a medical program as a humanitarian project. Most people are a little reluctant to oppose anything that suggests medical care for people who possibly can’t afford it.

Now, the American people, if you put it to them about socialized medicine and gave them a chance to choose, would unhesitatingly vote against it. We had an example of this. Under the Truman administration it was proposed that we have a compulsory health insurance program for all people in the United States, and, of course, the American people unhesitatingly rejected this.

So, with the American people on record as not wanting socialized medicine, Congressman Furan introduced the Furan Bill. This was the idea that all people of Social Security should be brought under a program of compulsory health insurance.

Now this would not only be our senior citizens, this would be the dependents and those who are disabled. This would be young people if they are dependents of someone eligible for Social Security.

Now Congressman Furan brought the program out on that idea of just for that particular group of people. But Congressman Furan was subscribing to this foot in the door philosophy because he said, “If we can only break through and get our foot inside the door, then we can expand the program after that.”

Walter Ruether said, “It’s no secret that the United Automobile Workers is officially on record as backing a program of national health insurance.” And by national health insurance he meant socialized medicine for every American.

Well let’s see what the Socialists themselves had to say about it. They say, “Once the Furan Bill is passed this nation will be provided with a mechanism for socialized medicine capable of indefinite expansion in every direction until it includes the entire population.” Well, we can’t say that we haven’t been warned.

Now Congressman Furan is no longer a Congressman of the United States Government. He has been replaced, not in his particular assignment but in his backing of such a bill by Congressman King of California.

It is presented in the idea of a great emergency that millions of our senior citizens are unable to provide needed medical care. But this ignores the fact that in the last decade 127 million of our citizens, in just ten years, have come under the protection of some kind of privately owned or hospital insurance.

Now the advocates of this bill when you try to oppose it challenge you on an emotional basis, they say what would you do, throw these poor old people out to die with no medical attention?

That’s ridiculous, and of course no one has advocated it. As a matter of fact, in the last session of Congress a bill was adopted known as the Kerr/Mills Bill. Now without even allowing this bill to be tried to see if it works they have introduced this King Bill, which is really the Furan Bill.

What is the Kerr/Mills Bill? It is a frank recognition of the medical need or problem of our senior citizens that I have mentioned. And it has provided from the federal government money to the states and local communities that can be used at the discretion of the state to help those people who need it.

Now what reason could the other people have for backing a bill which says we insist on compulsory health insurance for senior citizens on a basis of age alone, regardless of whether they are worth millions of dollars, whether they have an income, whether they’re protected by their own insurance, whether they have savings.

I think we can be excused for believing, that as ex-Congressman Furan said, “This was simply an excuse to bring about what they wanted all the time, socialized medicine.”

James Madison in 1788, speaking to the Virginia Convention said, “Since the general civilization of mankind I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachment of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations.”

They want to attach this bill to Social Security, and they say here is a great insurance program now instituted now working.

Let’s take a look at social security itself. Again, very few of us disagree with the original premise that there should be some form of savings that would keep destitution from following unemployment by reason of death, disability or old age. And to this end, social security was adopted, but it was never intended to supplant private savings, private insurance, pension programs of unions and industries.

Now in our country under our free enterprise system we have seen medicine reach the greatest heights that it has in any country in the world. Today, the relationship between patient and doctor in this country is something to be envied any place. The privacy, the care that is given to a person, the right to chose a doctor, the right to go from one doctor to the other.

But let’s also look from the other side, at the freedom the doctor loses. A doctor would be reluctant to say this. Well, like you, I am only a patient, so I can say it in his behalf. The doctor begins to lose freedoms; it’s like telling a lie, and one leads to another. First you decide that the doctor can have so many patients. They are equally divided among the various doctors by the government. But then the doctors aren’t equally divided geographically, so a doctor decides he wants to practice in one town and the government has to say to him you can’t live in that town, they already have enough doctors. You have to go some place else. And from here it is only a short step to dictating where he will go.

This is a freedom that I wonder whether any of us have the right to take from any human being. I know how I’d feel if you fellow citizens decided that to be an actor I had to become a government employee and work in a national theater.

Take it into your own occupation or that of your husband. All of us can see what happens once you establish the precedent that the government can determine a man’s working place and his working methods, determine his employment. From here it is a short step to all the rest of socialism, to determining his pay and pretty soon your son won’t decide when he’s in school where he will go or what he will do for a living. He will wait for the government to tell him where he will go to work and what he will do.

In this country of ours took place the greatest revolution that has ever taken place in worlds history, the only true revolution. Every other revolution simply exchanged one set of rulers for another.

But here for the first time in all the thousands of years of man’s relation to man, a little group of men, the founding fathers, for the first time established the idea that you and I had within ourselves the God-given right and ability to determine our own destiny. This freedom was built into our government with safeguards.

We talk democracy today, and strangely we let democracy begin to assume the aspect of majority rule is all that is needed. Well majority rule is a fine aspect of democracy provided there are guarantees written in to our government concerning the rights of the individual and of the minorities.

What can we do about this? Well, you and I can do a great deal. We can write to our congressmen and our senators. We can say right now that we want no further encroachment on these individual liberties and freedoms. And at the moment, the key issue is, we do not want socialized medicine.

Now you may think that when I say write to the Congressman or Senator that this is like writing fan mail to a television program, it isn’t. In Washington today 40,000 letters, less than one hundred per Congressman are evidence of a trend in public thinking.

Former Representative Halleck of Indiana has said, “When the American people want something from Congress, regardless of its political complexion, if they make their wants known, Congress does what the people want.”

So write, it’s as simple as finding just the name of your Congressman, or your Senator. Then you address your letter to that individuals name, if he’s a Congressman, to the House Office Building, Washington D.C. If he’s a Senator, to the Senate Office Building, Washington D.C.reagan_horseback

And if this man writes back to you and tells you that he or she too is for free enterprise, that we have these great services and so forth, that must be performed by government, don’t let them get away with it. Show that you have not been convinced. Write a letter right back and tell them that you believe in government economy and fiscal responsibility; that you know that governments don’t tax to get the money the need; governments will always find a need for the money they get and that you demand the continuation of our traditional free enterprise system. You and I can do this. The only way we can do it is by writing to our congressmen even we believe that he is on our side to begin with. Write to strengthen his hand. Give him the ability to stand before his colleagues in Congress and say “I have heard from my constituents and this is what they want.”

Write those letters now; call your friends and them to write them. If you don’t, this program I promise you, will pass just as surely as the sun will come up tomorrow, and behind it will come other federal programs that will invade every area of freedom as we have known it in this country. Until, one day, as Normal Thomas said we will awake to find that we have socialism. And if you don’t do this and if I don’t do it, one of these days you and I are going to spend our sunset years telling our children and our children’s children, what it once was like in America when men were free.

Source: Ronald Reagan Presidential Library & Museum

The above transcript is available in it’s original audio, recorded version HERE.

Comments: 13 Comments

13 Responses to “Ronald Reagan Speaks out on Socialized Medicine”

  1. Rockerbabe says:

    Interesting, everyone quotes Reagen, the man who knew absolutely nothing about math and came close to bankrupting this country with all of his military spending. Only Dubya out did him! It took Bill Clinton eight years to straighten out the mess Reagen and Bush, Sr left and now you are quoting him on socialism. What a joke!

    Americans do not have socialized medicine, except for Medicare and Medicaid and most most people like those programs. Then there is the VAMC; could you just imagine denying military personnel the benefit of that program? And, most parents like the SCHIPS program that provides insurance coverage for the kids.

    No, it seems, only the average American taxpayer is the one getting screwed. We pay for all the programs for the federal employees, military, Medicare, SCHIPS, Medicaid, etc., but we don’t get the benefit of any of those programs. The current debate should be about providing more OPTIONS for medical care, especially for those left out of the private insurance scam; yes, scam.
    48+ million folks have no private or public options availble to them for care. This isn’t about socialized medicine, it is about getting everyone covered, so they can get care without having to beg for it. And, so the medical entities can get paid for the services they render.

    Leave old, simplistic, crazy Reagin out of it; his time has come and passes and he has little to say that would fix the problem. He didn’t fix problems when he was President, so why would anyone think he could fix our problems today!

  2. [...] Webber: 08.14.09: “Ronald Reagan Speaks out on Socialized Medicine” I would not have guessed that the situation was so similar 48 years ago. It was the same [...]

  3. Joe says:

    Amen, Granny!
    I hadn’t thought about the VA. That’s the perfect example of government run health care WHEN THERE IS A CHOICE! Imagine how awful it would be WITHOUT a choice.

    I used to know the nicest elderly lady who’s husband had had a stroke and the nearest VA hospital that would care for him was in Augusta, Ga even thought she lived 30 minutes from a VA hospital in Atlanta. She couldn’t afford to sell her home and move so SHE HAD TO DRIVE 5+ HOURS JUST TO SEE HIM. The Atlanta facility could care for him but, for some bureaucratic reason or other, they weren’t willing to do so. She contacted every Congressman and Senator she could but to no avail. It was heartbreaking to see the red-tape nightmare she was in.

    The VA is the perfect example of government run healthcare and the poor level of quality they would provide.

    I can’t image the horrible level of care that we’ll be subject to if the government takes away all choice and gives us an expanded “VA Hospital” form of health “care”.

  4. John "from Minnesota" says:

    Granny,

    SHHH! You aren’t supposed to remember their crimes, much less expose them.

    I do have to wonder if the purpose of all those government “jobs” is to provide an income for individuals who are incapable of doing productive work.

    My comment does NOT impugn those who truly do a necessary task (job) at a government facility because they DO work hard and they DO their job well. It is the slimy slugs which really torque me.

  5. Granny says:

    I challenge all to examine the current Government operated health care system – it is called The V.A.

    Do you recall the huge scandal at Walter Reed a few years ago? The MOLD found in rooms with the patients? the peeling paint – the bad plumbing – and the lack of sufficient workers to care for the number of patients?

    Or, how about the many returning veterans who have been PROMISED life time health care but government has found ways to stall them (until they die or commit suicide).

    Or, Obama saying they should be paying for their health insurance because they KNEW when thy volunteered what they were doing and why should we be providing the coverage.

    If you really have been siding with the Nationalization of the Health Care industry I strongly suggest you take a good look at the current government health care and see if that is what you want – because you will get just that and maybe less as there will be so many more (ILLEGALS included) trying to make use of the system. No choice in what KIND of health care you wan or wish to use – that will be determined by some bureaucrat who has a script to follow.

    When you can honestly produce any government run operation that has been efficient or provided what it promised to produce then talk to me about a government operated health care system. Until then – JUST SAY NO to it all.

  6. Joe says:

    One simple question. Why can’t this be put to a nationwide vote? Clearly it has caused an uproar. If I were a Congressman, I’d be happy to get this “monkey off my back” and put the vote to the people. I have a feeling the Congressman who are in support of socialized healthcare are doing as they’re told by the Democratic Party. I can see no other reason why they’d be speaking in direct opposition to so many of their constituents.
    Again, why not vote on it? IMy only assumption is that the Socialists are in power and a nationwide vote would take that power out of their hands (and they certainly don’t want that to happen).

  7. Joe says:

    The argument that everyone deserves healthcare sounds good. Utopia also sounds good but we’ve never found a way to make that work either. The bottom line is, everyone knows a government run system is NEVER more efficient than a private (competitive) run system; regardless of how flawed that private system is. In fact, government run systems have a reputation for being enormously inefficient. They have no competition therefore have no incentive to provide good service. Been to the DMV lately? Or the Post Office? If the USPS was efficient… Fed Ex, UPS, and the like wouldn’t exist. And if we trust that the US Govt will have any reason to run healthcare (putting our very lives at stake) any more efficiently, we’re being naive.

  8. Mike says:

    Kevin – YES THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT SOCIALIZING MEDICINE!! That is what happens when the government gets control. READ THE BILL!!!!

    You want to know why no country has ever gotten rid of a socialized medicine program? Simple – they have all made private insurance ILLEGAL – the people have NO CHOICE, NO OPTION!

    Geez, what are you, like 12…???

  9. Nicholas Adams says:

    What we are all talking about is one in the same. Insurance is how we pay for medicine, and medical care, so by reforming the whole system under the government’s control, the government will be able to control the healthcare system by controlling when, where, and how the payments are issued. The unintended consequence of a public option is that it will force private insurance out of business and then it will no longer be competitively driven, which is what we need it to be. Also, the government will also control who get’s coverage and under what circumstances, because after all, they control the money flow. Let’s think about what kind of country we want here. Liberalism, by any other name, is becoming socialism, and the current healthcare debate illustrates that point. I work hard for my healthcare, and I don’t want it changed. According to Rasmussen polls, 89% of Americans with health insurance are happy with their insurance. If it’s the uninsured and the price that we’re concerned about, then let’s address those issues without changing the whole system. Once we go this route, there’s no going back. Then, we may just be longing for the good ole days

  10. Louis says:

    I hold it that Impeachment is necessary for the SOUND HEALTH of Government!

  11. Kevin says:

    They are not trying to socialize health care. They are trying to provide health insurance to everyone. Until you address that point, you are not talking about the issue at hand.

    As an aside, why is it that no country has ever given up their socialized health care? If it is so bad why don’t they get rid of it?

  12. [...] a look at this article on the current health care [...]

  13. Excellent resource.
    I would not have guessed that the situation was so similar 48 years ago. It was the same deceptive rhetoric from the socialists, playing on the same anxieties. The concept of the doctor/patient ratio being enforced and morphing into state-assigned employment is new, and an excellent one.
    The fact that the Health Control crowd hasn’t given up is disheartening. How long will we have to fight this battle? The Signers knew that without rigorous defense against an enemy eroding the foundation, the US would be temporary. The reason freedom-loving people allow power to flow to control-loving statists is a mystery, but still reality, and our fight to maintain freedom must continue.

    “I hold it that a little rebellion, now and then, is a good thing…
    “It is medicine necessary for the sound health of government.”
    –Thomas Jefferson to James Madison, 1787. ME 6:65

Leave a Reply