Powered by Max Banner Ads 

Butts: Obama urged to appoint first ‘gay’ to Supreme Court

This column is the REAL reason that the column heading, ‘Rear Window’ was developed some years ago. Is this some type of an internet hoax? First of all, I fell out of my chair when I read the name of the author. He must be the brother of Seymour. We can hear the cries now, “Nappy! Nappy! Nappy! Is Bonnie Fwank too old??? (Ed.)

oooooooMay 10, 2009With a vacancy soon on the U.S. Supreme Court, homosexual blogs are discussing the potential of a homosexual being appointed.

Politico.com reports homosexual-rights groups are upset with President Barack Obama for not choosing an openly “gay” person for his Cabinet, and are urging him to appoint the first openly homosexual justice. The Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund is hailing the candidacy of First Amendment scholar Kathleen Sullivan, while Stanford law professor Pam Karlan is also frequently mentioned. Both have been open about their sexuality and have been active for homosexual legal causes. Matt Barber is a spokesperson with Liberty Counsel. “Well, in light of this nation’s undeniable Christian heritage, it’s hard to believe we’re even having a conversation about whether a sitting United States president will count deviant sexual behavior as a favorable qualification in determining a nomination to the highest court of the land,” he says.

New Chair for the New Justice?

New Chair for the New Justice?

Barber offers a message for members of the Senate to send to President Obama. “We insist upon a Supreme Court justice who will strictly interpret the Constitution — which was the clear intent of our Founding Fathers — and not use the Constitution [or] abuse the Constitution as a means to an ideological end, which I fear this administration intends to do,” he concludes.

The new justice will replace Justice David Souter, who has announced he is retiring at the end of the current session.

Written by Charlie Butts for OneNewsNow.com

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

Comments: Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply