1) Get a list of names for those “Scientist” claiming it’s all Man-Made.
2) Create a webpage.
3) Create a DB out of the list.
4) Add what kind of “Scientist” they are.
5) What kind of degree they hold.
6) How many years they have been practicing.
7) Where they received their degree.
8) Add to which political party are registered?
9) What donations they’ve made.
10) What if any endorsements they’ve made.
11) Have they worked for any campaigns?
12) How many of them are employed by GVT.
13) How many of them will have more secure jobs if Cap and Trade is made ubiquitous.
14) Then setup a Reporting function to graph out the results.

I would be willing to bet that the “Scientists” who signed Al Gore propaganda instrument, are NOT what they claim to be. Furthermore, I would be willing to bet that a measurable percentage are actually gaining personally, or are overtly political.

I would go one step further. If you DON’T want the term “Scientist” to become as perverse and corrupt as the term Politician, you had better find a mature and accurate way to certify a “Scientist” and then recertify them using boards like the medical profession does so that “Quacks” can’t be calling themselves “Doctors”.

It seems to me that if Politicians are going to be claiming the authority implied by those claiming to be Scientist, that real Scientist HAD BETTER do something about that before the thinking of science, as politics!

The choice is yours of course. You can squander any remaining capital and devolve humanity by letting schmucks like Gore drag you all down in the muck with them, or you can do something about it before it’s too late and no one believes anything any of you have to say.

That, of course, will be the very moment in which a Scientist will have something very, very, very important to say to humanity, and no one will want to listen.

Thomas, the Earl of Doubt

PS Once you have you’re Board setup and a Constitution created:

Item #1- You’re NOT a “Scientist” if you sign political petitions, AS A SCIENTIST!

Item #2- You’re NOT a “Scientist” if you’re engaged in science for political purposes, YOU’RE A POLITICIAN!

Item #3- You’re NOT a “Scientist” by virtue of having received a degree; you ARE a scientist by virtue of receiving the discipline the degree is SUPPOSED to impart regardless of the title on your business card, and concordantly, you are committed to following the empirical evidence wherever it might lead you, and nowhere else until you’re sure you have an accurate and truthful answer that multiple peers can duplicate repeatedly. If you DO NOT have an answer that can be demonstrated repeatedly, then the status of the answer for which the question was put, is negative or bias neutralized?!?!? HELLO????